USMLE Official 2019 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
oh thats annoying haha. Makes me want to just not buy them since the tests/answers are all online now a days but probably not the right time to be cheap

I entertained that same thought, but yeah, it definitely helps to be able to answer the questions in test taking format instead of just reading them and their answers online haha
 
I entertained that same thought, but yeah, it definitely helps to be able to answer the questions in test taking format instead of just reading them and their answers online haha
are the questions weighted differently or are they scaled from a raw score
 
You can find enough threads on SDN where you can see peoples raw scores/200 and what the score was. All of them were a little different
Could you point me to these threads, I always just thought they were talking about raw scores in different tests mean different conversions to the step score.
 
Anyone have any tips on how to improve pathology, pathophys, and physiology? Apparently those 3 are my weakest areas according to UWorld but I'm not sure how to study them. I've already watched pathoma multiple times, am doing anki, should I watch all the B&B videos too?
 
Anyone have any tips on how to improve pathology, pathophys, and physiology? Apparently those 3 are my weakest areas according to UWorld but I'm not sure how to study them. I've already watched pathoma multiple times, am doing anki, should I watch all the B&B videos too?

Goljan could be helpful if you are having trouble connecting the dots. Its a little outdated. But i really like how he focused on pathophysiology.
 
I was thinking about taking one over spring break (wasn't originally going to) because the NBMEs are getting replaced on march 25th apparently:

NBME to Replace 80% of Step 1 Self-Assessments in March. What to Do?

Wondering the same as you though - which to take if they are all going away anyways..

So I'm registered to sit for the test in early June. So I have ~3 months. I was thinking do tests that will expire (13, 15, 16, 17, 19) before march 25th. Realistically could be done with one per week (or two weeks).

Then utilize the new tests afterwards. I'm concerned it might be a little too overzealous because classes for me don't technically end until may 31st. Our "board dedicated" time is approximately 2 weeks.
 
So I'm registered to sit for the test in early June. So I have ~3 months. I was thinking do tests that will expire (13, 15, 16, 17, 19) before march 25th. Realistically could be done with one per week (or two weeks).

Then utilize the new tests afterwards. I'm concerned it might be a little too overzealous because classes for me don't technically end until may 31st. Our "board dedicated" time is approximately 2 weeks.

Dang dude, nice! Why do you guys only have 2 legit dedicated weeks? That's insane...
 
Dang dude, nice! Why do you guys only have 2 legit dedicated weeks? That's insane...
Our DO school is trying to improve board scores by instituting mandatory attendance, tons of step 2 level clinical guest lecturers, and even shorter dedicated, more time spent not doing UW and sitting in their self-created useless reviews. FFFFFFUUUUUUU
 
So I'm registered to sit for the test in early June. So I have ~3 months. I was thinking do tests that will expire (13, 15, 16, 17, 19) before march 25th. Realistically could be done with one per week (or two weeks).

Then utilize the new tests afterwards. I'm concerned it might be a little too overzealous because classes for me don't technically end until may 31st. Our "board dedicated" time is approximately 2 weeks.

I’m wondering too if this is the best way to do them. Use 13 15 16 17 19 before dedicated and then use the new ones during dedicated
 
I'm somewhat skeptic about the new NBMEs, since there will be no actual data to assess their usefulness. I mean I'm still gonna do them, but newer doesn't always mean more predictive (eg NBME 18 vs 19, 16 vs 17). Right now, the most predictive of all, even more accurate than UWorld 1st pass % or any single NBME score is our NBME average, so I see no reason not to have one when test day arrives.
 
I'm somewhat skeptic about the new NBMEs, since there will be no actual data to assess their usefulness. I mean I'm still gonna do them, but newer doesn't always mean more predictive (eg NBME 18 vs 19, 16 vs 17). Right now, the most predictive of all, even more accurate than UWorld 1st pass % or any single NBME score is our NBME average, so I see no reason not to have one when test day arrives.
i mean, predictive power is kinda useless for those of us who cant extend their exam dates due to school restrictions. IMO, It is just an evaluation to make sure I dont have any glaring deficits.
 
Step 1: 258

UWorld: 85% (1st and only pass, tutor mode, random)
RX: 86%
Kaplan: 87%
46 days out - NBME 15: 250
30 days out - NBME 13: 250
23 days out - NBME 16: 252
16 days out - NBME 19: 250
9 days out - NBME 17: 252
1 day out - Free 120: 87%
NBME 18, UWSA 1 & 2: I did not take because I wanted to study rather than keep getting the same score on practice tests.


Before medical school: For most of my life, I have been a very below average student. Throughout elementary and high school, I was always near the bottom of my class. Because of this, I was rejected from literally every university that I applied to except for my city's university that I applied to at the very last minute. Decided I wanted to go to medical school in the middle of college, and obviously stepped it up a ton. When I started medical school, I expected that things were going to be a lot tougher than what I was used to academically. I was entering a school where the vast majority of my classmates had a lifetime of academic excellence, attended mostly Ivy League schools, stellar MCATs, probably higher IQs, etc. To make matters worse, I was solely interested in pursuing arguably the most competitive specialty in medicine, Dermatology. So, I started preparing for Step 1 on the very first day of medical school. For most people, this is considered overboard, gunnerish, whatever. I had my reasons for doing this though, and really didn't give a **** to listen to anyone advising our class to "hold off studying for step 1, you'll have plenty of time." I would argue that the majority of my classmates that followed this train of thought have not been doing so hot.

1st year of medical school (July - May 2018): During anatomy, I used our school's lectures, powerpoints, and firecracker. I was scoring within a point or two of the highest score on every professor written exam and the NBME subject exam. After anatomy, I completely ditched our school's curriculum and used only Firecracker, Boards and Beyond, Pathoma and Sketchy Micro / Pharm. Once we hit organ systems I continued with this but added on RX and Kaplan questions. My professor written exam scores plummeted, but I stayed about the same on NBME subject exams. I studied probably five days a week from 8am-7pm and about three hours a day on Saturday and Sunday. I would take a 1 to 2 hour lunch break. I still had plenty of time to socialize, work out, travel, go to concerts, live a completely normal life.

2nd year of medical school (August - December 2018): Continued with the same routine through the rest of organ systems. Still did not watch a school lecture, open up a school powerpoint, use school's study guides, professor written questions, etc. Actually ended up scoring the lowest grade on our last professor written exam before starting dedicated. First couple months was same study style as first year, last couple months started studying on the weekends a little bit more. Still had plenty of time to have a completely normal life.

Dedicated (46 days): By this point, I had marked and completed 100% of Firecracker, 100% of Pathoma watched only once (some vids twice), 100% of Sketchy Micro / Pharm, about 90% of Boards and Beyond, 75% of RX, 50% of Kaplan, 0% of UWorld. Obviously, I needed to spend most of my time during dedicated using UWorld and doing NBMEs. I did only 40-70 questions of UWorld every day, and that was it. I still had about 200 questions left that I didn't finish, UWorld kept adding more questions every day towards the end of my study block. My schedule was very similar to year 2 except that my weekends were just as intense as my weekdays. The last week or two I studied an extra hour or two per day.

Thoughts on exam: Very fair test. On average, the stems were significantly longer than UWorld. First block was the easiest block I've ever encountered and a lot of my buddies felt similarly. Middle blocks were the toughest. Your exam might be different, don't let a tough/easy block psych you out. Marked anywhere from 5-20 per block. About 95% of the exam I could tell you the exact concept that they were testing and where it would be located in UFAPS. Less than 5% of the exam was on bugs/drugs/topics that I only found in Firecracker or had to guess. Often times these "random" topics were incorrect answer choices, but a few times I can confirm that they were the correct answer choice. I do know of two questions specifically that were on things that were only in older editions of First Aid (based on citations in Firecracker). Maybe you could get these questions right through process of elimination, or maybe they weren't actually the correct answer choice and I messed up.

My take on score predictions: I would strongly suggest calculating your NBME average and subtracting 5 or 10 points. This should be a score that you are willing to accept as a score that you might get. I many times have told myself over the past month to be happy if I score above a 240-245. Too many times people post about how devastated they are when they receive a final score that falls right around (or even above) the average of their practice scores. This idea that people regularly outscore their practice scores is going to set up most people for disappointment. Don't believe me? Go to the 2018 scores thread. Report back how many times you see someone hoping for a 250, 260, 270, posting every few days and then just completely disappear from this site within a few days of receiving their official score never to report how they did. It happens a lot. I would imagine these are some of the thousands of people who scored below their average that aren't really in the mood to do a write up on SDN or fill out the reddit score correlation surveys. Then, on the other end, you have people like me who luckily score above their average and excitedly post about it on SDN or reddit and give members a false sense that you should expect nearly a ten point jump from your NBME average. Don't do this. Humble yourself, work on lowering those expectations while waiting for your score to come back.

That all being said, there is something to be said about setting realistic goals and working to make those dreams a reality. Here's a post I made about eight months ago.

My first practice test was a 250. I got a 258 on game day.

My suggestions: Study harder. That doesn't mean to study more hours, add more resources, or over complicate things. Just take the few resources that have been recommended time and time again on here (Zanki/Lightyear or Firecracker, the big 3 q-banks, FAPS, +/- BB) and absolutely crush those every single day from here until your exam day. Use these resources in whatever way works best for you. If that means doing a chapter of first aid, two chapters of Pathoma on 4x speed, and six UWorld blocks before lunch every day, then that's great. If all you can handle is two blocks of UWorld in a 12 hour day, then that is perfectly fine too. It doesn't matter if you're a first or second year student in dedicated, start grinding. Close down SDN, shut off your phone, sit in a corner in the library alone, do whatever you have to do to grind. When your shift is over for the day. Go enjoy your life, relationships, hobbies, whatever.

Myths:

  1. "You need to study school material to score above a 250 or 260."
  2. "People who do well on Step 1 are naturally good test takers."
  3. "There's a ton of questions on Step 1 that are not covered in the big resources."
  4. "Most people outscore their NBME average."

Happy to answer any questions or clarify anything.
Congrats on the score. Your hard work during the first 2 years clearly paid off as evidenced by your high “baseline” score.
A few things:
- shoulda started uworld earlier
- shouldnt have ignored your schools curriculum (there are internal ranking systems)
- using that many resources means you may have spread yourself too thin and skipped on understanding the info in order to apply it to new scenarios which test writers invariably come up with. Memorizing can get you a great score, but working to understand more will get you further. You cannot argue that studying hard will work and other factors are less important bc for one, it doesnt work for everyone and two, there are people who just use UFAP durig dedicated and end up with 260s.
 
Last edited:
Step 1: 258

UWorld: 85% (1st and only pass, tutor mode, random)
RX: 86%
Kaplan: 87%
46 days out - NBME 15: 250
30 days out - NBME 13: 250
23 days out - NBME 16: 252
16 days out - NBME 19: 250
9 days out - NBME 17: 252
1 day out - Free 120: 87%
NBME 18, UWSA 1 & 2: I did not take because I wanted to study rather than keep getting the same score on practice tests.


Before medical school: For most of my life, I have been a very below average student. Throughout elementary and high school, I was always near the bottom of my class. Because of this, I was rejected from literally every university that I applied to except for my city's university that I applied to at the very last minute. Decided I wanted to go to medical school in the middle of college, and obviously stepped it up a ton. When I started medical school, I expected that things were going to be a lot tougher than what I was used to academically. I was entering a school where the vast majority of my classmates had a lifetime of academic excellence, attended mostly Ivy League schools, stellar MCATs, probably higher IQs, etc. To make matters worse, I was solely interested in pursuing arguably the most competitive specialty in medicine, Dermatology. So, I started preparing for Step 1 on the very first day of medical school. For most people, this is considered overboard, gunnerish, whatever. I had my reasons for doing this though, and really didn't give a **** to listen to anyone advising our class to "hold off studying for step 1, you'll have plenty of time." I would argue that the majority of my classmates that followed this train of thought have not been doing so hot.

1st year of medical school (July - May 2018): During anatomy, I used our school's lectures, powerpoints, and firecracker. I was scoring within a point or two of the highest score on every professor written exam and the NBME subject exam. After anatomy, I completely ditched our school's curriculum and used only Firecracker, Boards and Beyond, Pathoma and Sketchy Micro / Pharm. Once we hit organ systems I continued with this but added on RX and Kaplan questions. My professor written exam scores plummeted, but I stayed about the same on NBME subject exams. I studied probably five days a week from 8am-7pm and about three hours a day on Saturday and Sunday. I would take a 1 to 2 hour lunch break. I still had plenty of time to socialize, work out, travel, go to concerts, live a completely normal life.

2nd year of medical school (August - December 2018): Continued with the same routine through the rest of organ systems. Still did not watch a school lecture, open up a school powerpoint, use school's study guides, professor written questions, etc. Actually ended up scoring the lowest grade on our last professor written exam before starting dedicated. First couple months was same study style as first year, last couple months started studying on the weekends a little bit more. Still had plenty of time to have a completely normal life.

Dedicated (46 days): By this point, I had marked and completed 100% of Firecracker, 100% of Pathoma watched only once (some vids twice), 100% of Sketchy Micro / Pharm, about 90% of Boards and Beyond, 75% of RX, 50% of Kaplan, 0% of UWorld. Obviously, I needed to spend most of my time during dedicated using UWorld and doing NBMEs. I did only 40-70 questions of UWorld every day, and that was it. I still had about 200 questions left that I didn't finish, UWorld kept adding more questions every day towards the end of my study block. My schedule was very similar to year 2 except that my weekends were just as intense as my weekdays. The last week or two I studied an extra hour or two per day.

Thoughts on exam: Very fair test. On average, the stems were significantly longer than UWorld. First block was the easiest block I've ever encountered and a lot of my buddies felt similarly. Middle blocks were the toughest. Your exam might be different, don't let a tough/easy block psych you out. Marked anywhere from 5-20 per block. About 95% of the exam I could tell you the exact concept that they were testing and where it would be located in UFAPS. Less than 5% of the exam was on bugs/drugs/topics that I only found in Firecracker or had to guess. Often times these "random" topics were incorrect answer choices, but a few times I can confirm that they were the correct answer choice. I do know of two questions specifically that were on things that were only in older editions of First Aid (based on citations in Firecracker). Maybe you could get these questions right through process of elimination, or maybe they weren't actually the correct answer choice and I messed up.

My take on score predictions: I would strongly suggest calculating your NBME average and subtracting 5 or 10 points. This should be a score that you are willing to accept as a score that you might get. I many times have told myself over the past month to be happy if I score above a 240-245. Too many times people post about how devastated they are when they receive a final score that falls right around (or even above) the average of their practice scores. This idea that people regularly outscore their practice scores is going to set up most people for disappointment. Don't believe me? Go to the 2018 scores thread. Report back how many times you see someone hoping for a 250, 260, 270, posting every few days and then just completely disappear from this site within a few days of receiving their official score never to report how they did. It happens a lot. I would imagine these are some of the thousands of people who scored below their average that aren't really in the mood to do a write up on SDN or fill out the reddit score correlation surveys. Then, on the other end, you have people like me who luckily score above their average and excitedly post about it on SDN or reddit and give members a false sense that you should expect nearly a ten point jump from your NBME average. Don't do this. Humble yourself, work on lowering those expectations while waiting for your score to come back.

That all being said, there is something to be said about setting realistic goals and working to make those dreams a reality. Here's a post I made about eight months ago.

My first practice test was a 250. I got a 258 on game day.

My suggestions: Study harder. That doesn't mean to study more hours, add more resources, or over complicate things. Just take the few resources that have been recommended time and time again on here (Zanki/Lightyear or Firecracker, the big 3 q-banks, FAPS, +/- BB) and absolutely crush those every single day from here until your exam day. Use these resources in whatever way works best for you. If that means doing a chapter of first aid, two chapters of Pathoma on 4x speed, and six UWorld blocks before lunch every day, then that's great. If all you can handle is two blocks of UWorld in a 12 hour day, then that is perfectly fine too. It doesn't matter if you're a first or second year student in dedicated, start grinding. Close down SDN, shut off your phone, sit in a corner in the library alone, do whatever you have to do to grind. When your shift is over for the day. Go enjoy your life, relationships, hobbies, whatever.

Myths:

  1. "You need to study school material to score above a 250 or 260."
  2. "People who do well on Step 1 are naturally good test takers."
  3. "There's a ton of questions on Step 1 that are not covered in the big resources."
  4. "Most people outscore their NBME average."

Happy to answer any questions or clarify anything.
Huge congrats and very glad to see it paid off for you.

You and FootFetish are def role models from these threads showing how sticking to a plan of hard work day in and day out gets results.

All the best moving forward for Derm Dreams
 
Last edited:
Ahh, still floating around on the Step 1 forums as a fourth year I see? Before you remind everyone again, congratulations on your >265+ from two years ago.

Thanks so much for the advice on what I should and shouldn't have done, really helpful stuff.
Petty. I dont reference my score unless someone asks. Also, i dont say >265+. Thats just redundant. Also, the advice isnt for you.
I only comment bc some students read your posts and believe you did it the right way and that they should do the same. I dont agree with you. Not sure where the admiration for you and footfetish comes from? Bc you call yourselves stupid and therefore your higher scores are more valid?

For those reading who arent arrogant and want a different perspective:
Ignoring your classwork and being in the bottom of your class is not worth it, and you do not need to mindlessly memorize 400 resources to do well on step 1. In fact there are people who do this and actually bomb the test, albeit for many different reasons im sure.
Your class rank matters - dont blow off your class exams.
Uworld is by far the best resource available to us - precisely bc it teaches you how to think for the test. Other question banks are good too. Start them early if you want step 1 oriented material.
Pick a few resources to use and know them well. They all basically teach the same info, plus or minus some low yield stuff.
 
Step 1: 258

UWorld: 85% (1st and only pass, tutor mode, random)
RX: 86%
Kaplan: 87%
46 days out - NBME 15: 250
30 days out - NBME 13: 250
23 days out - NBME 16: 252
16 days out - NBME 19: 250
9 days out - NBME 17: 252
1 day out - Free 120: 87%
NBME 18, UWSA 1 & 2: I did not take because I wanted to study rather than keep getting the same score on practice tests.

I think it's fascinating that your UWorld, Rx and Kaplan percentages are absolute god tier, yet your NBME's are all around 250. Do you have any thoughts on why that might have been the case?

@Newyawk suggests that maybe you spread yourself too thin and didn't "understand" well enough... but I don't think you get QBank scores like that without a really solid understanding... agree/disagree?

I only comment bc some students read your posts and believe you did it the right way and that they should do the same. I dont agree with you.

I appreciate your posts here. I don't always agree with what you say, but it's so important that we have people willing to shake up the group-think echo chamber that can so easily take over on these internet communities.

f56df518ac2573e48c5a72ab82430188d7a27c74d84be86470fbe1b4cf525f7f.jpg
 
The questions I was getting wrong on NBMEs typically required zero clinical reasoning/understanding and were purely rote memorization that I hadn't seen in a long time, forgot, or slipped up on. Firecracker has horrible spaced repetition so I do poorly on first order questions (something that Anki users won't have to deal with). A couple months ago, I met with our school's academic advisor who showed me hard data over the past two years that indicated I rarely ever get higher order questions wrong. The actual exam day might have tested more clinical reasoning than regurgitating facts which I would imagine is the reason I had a score jump on the real deal. My q-bank averages seem good until you go to past years threads and see that tons of members are scoring in the high 80s on UWorld and mostly score in the 250s or low 260s. The curve is getting harsher and harsher every year. To address @Newyawk 's comments, I think I have a pretty decent "understanding" of the material considering I did still score higher than 95ish% of medical students who took step 1, and was given honors by the creator of school's curriculum in our clinical reasoning course. That same professor also encouraged me to "keep doing what I was doing" when I told them I was not using the school's materials because it clearly was evident that I was doing something right. My entire study strategy revolves around understanding over memorizing, hence the spending 12 hours a day googling and researching simply 60 UWorld questions a day during dedicated, and to use FC over Anki for the past two years.

I'm not sure how I could have spread myself thin. I used literally fewer resources than probably anyone on this forum. I used boards and beyond for my lectures instead of the school's lectures, q-banks for questions, firecracker for flash cards and then Pathoma and Sketchy (which every member does). I never even opened First Aid.

To address the internal ranking system, I still ended up above average on every block that we've had so far. I'm not even close to the bottom of my medical school's class.

@Newyawk has been responding to my posts now for about a year telling me how my study strategy is going to lead to failure. I really could give a **** less about what he/she thinks about my study strategy, I'm honestly perfectly content with my performance so far. I have never told anyone the "correct" way to study. I encourage people to do what works for them regardless of whatever that study strategy may be. I encourage people to work hard, and give it their all because really that is all that any of us can do. I don't consider myself "stupid" as @Newyawk has pointed out. I use my educational background as an indication that you don't have to be a super genius to walk away from step 1 with a respectable score. That even high scores are attainable from students that don't have a record of academic excellence. I was under the impression that this was the "step 1 experiences and scores thread." I was trying to provide some insight into my experience.
Its funny youre taking this so personally. I dont even remember addressing you directly, but if i did it was bc I was trying to help you and others, not demean you. Congrats on your score dude im done with this convo.
 
Currently averaging 50% on UWorld (25% complete )

so seeing some of these averages is giving me a panic attack haha
There are a few schools of thought on this. Everyone uses it differently. Maybe figure out why you are getting questions wrong?
 
There are a few schools of thought on this. Everyone uses it differently. Maybe figure out why you are getting questions wrong?

My curriculum has covered everything but psych. and I've selectively chosen sections that are covered all ready so its not like I'm seeing a ton of new concepts. All i can do is just keep improving and hope it works out.

I'm probably going to take NBME 13 this weekend. Probably will not score well but i'm hoping to use it as a motivation for the next three months.
 
The score report is pretty much worthless, it doesn’t tell you anything about which sections you did well or poorly in. Not sure why they changed it
 
The score report is pretty much worthless, it doesn’t tell you anything about which sections you did well or poorly in. Not sure why they changed it
The old score reports used to show your performance relative to all test takers, whereas the new one shows you how you performed in each specific category relative to the rest of your own exam. Its not very sensitive as it just says “lower, same, higher”. My CK report is sames literally all the way down. I suppose it can be useful, and this seems to be their intention, for those who need to retake the exam due to failure as it shows them which categories they personally can improve on and which they can study less. While it doesnt satisfy the ego as much, it probably is more useful - the older score reports used to have huge bars that often werent clear about which areas to improve upon.
 
Step 1: 258

UWorld: 85% (1st and only pass, tutor mode, random)
RX: 86%
Kaplan: 87%
46 days out - NBME 15: 250
30 days out - NBME 13: 250
23 days out - NBME 16: 252
16 days out - NBME 19: 250
9 days out - NBME 17: 252
1 day out - Free 120: 87%
NBME 18, UWSA 1 & 2: I did not take because I wanted to study rather than keep getting the same score on practice tests.


Before medical school: For most of my life, I have been a very below average student. Throughout elementary and high school, I was always near the bottom of my class. Because of this, I was rejected from literally every university that I applied to except for my city's university that I applied to at the very last minute. Decided I wanted to go to medical school in the middle of college, and obviously stepped it up a ton. When I started medical school, I expected that things were going to be a lot tougher than what I was used to academically. I was entering a school where the vast majority of my classmates had a lifetime of academic excellence, attended mostly Ivy League schools, stellar MCATs, probably higher IQs, etc. To make matters worse, I was solely interested in pursuing arguably the most competitive specialty in medicine, Dermatology. So, I started preparing for Step 1 on the very first day of medical school. For most people, this is considered overboard, gunnerish, whatever. I had my reasons for doing this though, and really didn't give a **** to listen to anyone advising our class to "hold off studying for step 1, you'll have plenty of time." I would argue that the majority of my classmates that followed this train of thought have not been doing so hot.

1st year of medical school (July - May 2018): During anatomy, I used our school's lectures, powerpoints, and firecracker. I was scoring within a point or two of the highest score on every professor written exam and the NBME subject exam. After anatomy, I completely ditched our school's curriculum and used only Firecracker, Boards and Beyond, Pathoma and Sketchy Micro / Pharm. Once we hit organ systems I continued with this but added on RX and Kaplan questions. My professor written exam scores plummeted, but I stayed about the same on NBME subject exams. I studied probably five days a week from 8am-7pm and about three hours a day on Saturday and Sunday. I would take a 1 to 2 hour lunch break. I still had plenty of time to socialize, work out, travel, go to concerts, live a completely normal life.

2nd year of medical school (August - December 2018): Continued with the same routine through the rest of organ systems. Still did not watch a school lecture, open up a school powerpoint, use school's study guides, professor written questions, etc. Actually ended up scoring the lowest grade on our last professor written exam before starting dedicated. First couple months was same study style as first year, last couple months started studying on the weekends a little bit more. Still had plenty of time to have a completely normal life.

Dedicated (46 days): By this point, I had marked and completed 100% of Firecracker, 100% of Pathoma watched only once (some vids twice), 100% of Sketchy Micro / Pharm, about 90% of Boards and Beyond, 75% of RX, 50% of Kaplan, 0% of UWorld. Obviously, I needed to spend most of my time during dedicated using UWorld and doing NBMEs. I did only 40-70 questions of UWorld every day, and that was it. I still had about 200 questions left that I didn't finish, UWorld kept adding more questions every day towards the end of my study block. My schedule was very similar to year 2 except that my weekends were just as intense as my weekdays. The last week or two I studied an extra hour or two per day.

Thoughts on exam: Very fair test. On average, the stems were significantly longer than UWorld. First block was the easiest block I've ever encountered and a lot of my buddies felt similarly. Middle blocks were the toughest. Your exam might be different, don't let a tough/easy block psych you out. Marked anywhere from 5-20 per block. About 95% of the exam I could tell you the exact concept that they were testing and where it would be located in UFAPS. Less than 5% of the exam was on bugs/drugs/topics that I only found in Firecracker or had to guess. Often times these "random" topics were incorrect answer choices, but a few times I can confirm that they were the correct answer choice. I do know of two questions specifically that were on things that were only in older editions of First Aid (based on citations in Firecracker). Maybe you could get these questions right through process of elimination, or maybe they weren't actually the correct answer choice and I messed up.

My take on score predictions: I would strongly suggest calculating your NBME average and subtracting 5 or 10 points. This should be a score that you are willing to accept as a score that you might get. I many times have told myself over the past month to be happy if I score above a 240-245. Too many times people post about how devastated they are when they receive a final score that falls right around (or even above) the average of their practice scores. This idea that people regularly outscore their practice scores is going to set up most people for disappointment. Don't believe me? Go to the 2018 scores thread. Report back how many times you see someone hoping for a 250, 260, 270, posting every few days and then just completely disappear from this site within a few days of receiving their official score never to report how they did. It happens a lot. I would imagine these are some of the thousands of people who scored below their average that aren't really in the mood to do a write up on SDN or fill out the reddit score correlation surveys. Then, on the other end, you have people like me who luckily score above their average and excitedly post about it on SDN or reddit and give members a false sense that you should expect nearly a ten point jump from your NBME average. Don't do this. Humble yourself, work on lowering those expectations while waiting for your score to come back.

That all being said, there is something to be said about setting realistic goals and working to make those dreams a reality. Here's a post I made about eight months ago.

My first practice test was a 250. I got a 258 on game day.

My suggestions: Study harder. That doesn't mean to study more hours, add more resources, or over complicate things. Just take the few resources that have been recommended time and time again on here (Zanki/Lightyear or Firecracker, the big 3 q-banks, FAPS, +/- BB) and absolutely crush those every single day from here until your exam day. Use these resources in whatever way works best for you. If that means doing a chapter of first aid, two chapters of Pathoma on 4x speed, and six UWorld blocks before lunch every day, then that's great. If all you can handle is two blocks of UWorld in a 12 hour day, then that is perfectly fine too. It doesn't matter if you're a first or second year student in dedicated, start grinding. Close down SDN, shut off your phone, sit in a corner in the library alone, do whatever you have to do to grind. When your shift is over for the day. Go enjoy your life, relationships, hobbies, whatever.

Myths:

  1. "You need to study school material to score above a 250 or 260."
  2. "People who do well on Step 1 are naturally good test takers."
  3. "There's a ton of questions on Step 1 that are not covered in the big resources."
  4. "Most people outscore their NBME average."

Happy to answer any questions or clarify anything.

This is so motivating to hear. My school scores dropped when I switched to board-focused studying. Going from killing it last year to where I am now kinda eats away at me every day & it's difficult to see the light at the end of the tunnel (especially with all the uncertainty involved with boards), so posts like this give me a nice boost of motivation. Congrats & thanks so much for posting.
 
The old score reports used to show your performance relative to all test takers, whereas the new one shows you how you performed in each specific category relative to the rest of your own exam. Its not very sensitive as it just says “lower, same, higher”. My CK report is sames literally all the way down. I suppose it can be useful, and this seems to be their intention, for those who need to retake the exam due to failure as it shows them which categories they personally can improve on and which they can study less. While it doesnt satisfy the ego as much, it probably is more useful - the older score reports used to have huge bars that often werent clear about which areas to improve upon.
Yep mine says same all the way down too. But I thought the old would at least show if you were below/above the average for each section? That seems like it would be more helpful for someone who has to retake it
 
This is so motivating to hear. My school scores dropped when I switched to board-focused studying. Going from killing it last year to where I am now kinda eats away at me every day & it's difficult to see the light at the end of the tunnel (especially with all the uncertainty involved with boards), so posts like this give me a nice boost of motivation. Congrats & thanks so much for posting.

You guys have any sort of ranking? We got quartiles and I reallyyyy don't want to drop a quartile, would ruin my confidence going into dedicated.
 
Wanted to join the thread looking forward to the support here! I found it really motivating to use the SDN experience thread for the mcat 2 years ago and that worked out really well back then for me!

Goal: > 260 (like libertyyne I'll be happy above a 240 though). Dedicated starts May, exam in June
Background: strong standardized test taker, normally 1-1.5 stdev above class avg on exams and around avg for weak subjects

Plan pre-dedicated:
- Mature as much of zanki as possible (15k matured, 7k to go - hoping to do 100-150 new cards 5 days a week til dedicated and have 2-3k cards incomplete)
- 2 passes done of sketchy micro - done
- 1 pass of pathoma - almost done
- 1 pass through FA (alongside zanki)
- As many questions as possible (UW/Rx/Kaplan) - havent done much yet

Plan for dedicated in prioritized order:
- Minimum 2 random timed UW blocks per day (up to 4. For learning and thorough review)
- Review questions with 1st pass making notes, second pass converting notes to anki cards. Priority for review is UW > Kaplan > Rx
- All NBMEs and UWSA
- Finish Kaplan (random timed, mostly for pattern recognition)
- Finish Rx (random timed, mostly for pattern recognition)
- second pass of pathoma
- 1 pass through BnB with FA open focusing on weak spots
- Finish rapid review anki deck close to exam date + third pass of ch1-3 in pathoma
- Keep up with zanki reviews (undecided about this. Might just keep my weak sections and suspend the rest.)

Going to use cramfighter to create a schedule for dedicated taking 1 afternoon + night off per week. Questions > anything else will be the name of the game during dedicated for me. Have no issue with not doing the lower priority stuff if it means I get more questions in.


good luck to everyone!!
 
Last edited:
You guys have any sort of ranking? We got quartiles and I reallyyyy don't want to drop a quartile, would ruin my confidence going into dedicated.
Our school doesnt have rank, but they internally track. I need to remain in the top 20 remain in contention for AOA. So hoping to keep up the grind, its been rough tho since i basically have to memorize the school minutiae in 2 days before exam, while I focus on board stuff outside of that. Currently in the top decile, hoping to remain a full SD above the median through the rest of the year.
 
Yep mine says same all the way down too. But I thought the old would at least show if you were below/above the average for each section? That seems like it would be more helpful for someone who has to retake it
They did show where you stood relative to other test takers. However, unless you really bombed or killed a section, your bar was usually very large and often crossed the average bar anyway, so it was difficult to interpret. Consider that in the context of several bars that all kinda look the same - for most people it wasnt very informative. My impression was it stroked the egos of those who did well and did the opposite for failed exams.
The shelf exams were the funniest - they broke it down by sex and age sometimes. I once destroyed the male category but was average in the female section. What use is there in telling me that?

Strange that you also got all sames. Another person in the CK thread had the same result. Gotta be some poor stats behind this cuz thats clearly useless to everyone.
 
Would love to hear more opinions on this as well!
Im going to be doing anki incorrects from uworld. I will be trying to do as many questions as I can, and simulate a few full length exams, i doubt i will have time to stay on top of zanki. If i realize that I am weak in a particular subject I may just do that subjects cards.
 
Last edited:
Im going to be doing anki incorrects from uworld. I will be trying to do as many questions as I can, and simulate a few full length exams, i doubt i will have time to stay on top of zanki. If i realize that I am weak in a particular subject I may just do that subjects cards.

Cool this was my thought as well. I was going to maintain it up until dedicated and then probably only use my pepper sketchy deck (maybe drop this if I feel I have mastered sketchy) and Uworld incorrects
 
Im going to be doing anki incorrects from uworld. I will be trying to do as many questions as I can, and simulate a few full length exams, i doubt i will have time to stay on top of zanki. If i realize that I am weak in a particular subject I may just do that subjects cards.
Cool this was my thought as well. I was going to maintain it up until dedicated and then probably only use my pepper sketchy deck (maybe drop this if I feel I have mastered sketchy) and Uworld incorrects

another option could be to drop the leech threshold to something low like 3 and use that tag to decide what to keep through dedicated. another option could be to just suspend all mature cards once dedicated starts so you're just finishing up the cards you've seen less.

i think im going to make the decision based on the first week of dedicated and how many reviews it ends up being per day when factoring in cards from qbank questions. if its < 800 reviews, ill probably stick with it since that takes me about 1-1.5 hours or so which isn't too bad/doesn't mentally fatigue me too much.
 
Does doing questions>>>Zanki? I know doing questions are important but I've tried doing questions without doing zanki and I do poorly. Once I keep up with zanki daily, the questions become much easier. Even for higher order thinking-type questions, majority of the time you need to know specific facts in order to complete each step of thinking required to get to the correct answer, and a lot of that requires rote memorization.

But idk, I'm still struggling with the time commitment of zanki since it takes up so much time and I'm in dedicated. It's really easy to forget stuff--especially all the minute details
 
Does doing questions>>>Zanki? I know doing questions are important but I've tried doing questions without doing zanki and I do poorly. Once I keep up with zanki daily, the questions become much easier. Even for higher order thinking-type questions, majority of the time you need to know specific facts in order to complete each step of thinking required to get to the correct answer, and a lot of that requires rote memorization.

But idk, I'm still struggling with the time commitment of zanki since it takes up so much time and I'm in dedicated. It's really easy to forget stuff--especially all the minute details
The studies i have seen indicate that every 200~ unique questions is equal to 1 point increase on step. It completely depends on the test taker.IMO, You should be learning from the questions you get wrong, not just doing questions to do questions.
 
They did show where you stood relative to other test takers. However, unless you really bombed or killed a section, your bar was usually very large and often crossed the average bar anyway, so it was difficult to interpret. Consider that in the context of several bars that all kinda look the same - for most people it wasnt very informative. My impression was it stroked the egos of those who did well and did the opposite for failed exams.
The shelf exams were the funniest - they broke it down by sex and age sometimes. I once destroyed the male category but was average in the female section. What use is there in telling me that?

Strange that you also got all sames. Another person in the CK thread had the same result. Gotta be some poor stats behind this cuz thats clearly useless to everyone.
So far from my class (n=3) everyone who’s taken it had same all the way down. So it’s pretty much useless.
 
What's the best way to improve micro if you have already gone through sketchy and its still my worst subject?

Ya you just gotta get going on the Anki train brotha (&/or sista.) Whether it's lolnotacop or Pepper (salt? w/e it's called) as long as you are getting reps in & looking at those images you are headed in the right direction.

The key to sketchy is engraining those images into your head. Best way to actively do that is practicing recall w/ high repetitions. Make sure you look at the picture every time. It'll get to the point that you have seen the picture so much that as soon as you see the microbe in a Q Stem you'll instantly have a picture of the setting in your head & you just have to "look around" for the memory trigger Sketchy gives you (I know it sounds weird to "look around inside of an image your brain populates" but that is literally exactly how it works.)
 
Throwing my hat in here- hopefully I'm not too late to the game. Last year's thread was super helpful, and it's fun to follow along with folks.

State school, supposedly low ranked (but I love it)
Rank isn't published but all honors so far, likely in top 10%

Goal Score: 270 (it's fun to dream)
CBSE0 (school required in October): 229
Traditional curriculum
Applied to med school for surgery-never really considered anything else. Still about surgery but not sure which subspecialty. Who knows though, I could hit the wards and decide peds is for me. I'm intent on keeping an open mind.

Goals pre-dedicated:
Finish Zanki pharm+OG decks
Finish lolnotacop micro deck
Finish USLMERx - Currently 82%
Finish Pathoma
Finish Kaplan Qbank - Currently 82%

Current Status:

Used Zanki off and on first half of MS2 but started to focus more on it around October. Didn't use anki much MS1 except for anatomy (not Zanki). I'm all in on Anki now though and have been grinding it since late Dec. About 65% done with both zankis. Chugging through the lolnotacop deck with about 20-30% done. Did some Kaplan Qbank last fall with classes, but not much. Started USMLERx in January. About halfway done with both Qbanks. I only do questions for subjects I have covered, but I try to make sure I'm far enough removed from subjects before including them. I find that is more productive for me.

Future Plans:

I'm planning to pepper in some light Uworld soon, but I want to make it my focus during dedicated. Not sure about how I should plan my NBMEs or how many I need to take. Test is scheduled for the end of May. I'm sitting at about 1500 cards (news+reviews) a day with regular Qbank work + classes/lectures + research. Honestly it's exhausting lol. I'm counting down the days until I can walk away from this grind. If I didn't get my run in every day I'd be losing it. Also, the stress of trying to get my research off my plate before dedicated has actually been worse than any school-related stress. Not fun, but I should be sitting pretty come third year with time to focus on developing real skills.

Advice:

For anyone reading this looking for study advice, I HIGHLY recommend starting a Qbank early. I quickly realized that I was extremely weak in micro, and micro is a huge part of this process. Like 10-15% of all my questions seem to have some micro component, and micro stuff was half of my wrongs early on. In response to this I added the lolnotacop deck to my rotation, and it has been immensely helpful.

tl:dr CHECK YOUR KNOWLEDGE EARLY AND ADJUST. You don't want to be panicking in dedicated realizing you suck at broad subjects with only a few weeks available.

Anyway, best of luck to everyone else on that grind. We've got this! And don't forget that demonstrated passion for a specialty can overcome whatever happens (except for maybe derm/ent that **** is wild). Also, sorry for the wall of text.

Pce
 
Top