BMBiology said:
I think most people on this forum would agree that you have done more for the students at HICP and the profession than Dr. Rosenberg. Although I am not blaming Dr. Rosenberg, I still believe USN and Dr. Rosenberg could have done more.
Do you really think USC would stand by and let some scam misrepresents the university? Do you think USC would just post on its website that there is no assocation between USC and HICP? Don't tell me that USN does not have any lawyers working for the university to do more to protect the university and the profession of pharmacy. Please don't tell me that USN could not have done much more. Please think about it.
I think we both agree that this proves, not only be a careless mistake, but also a public disaster for USN. I think I am done discussing this matter.
How do you know what Rosenberg/USN has or has not done? How do you know that he has not spoken with the Hawaii Consumer Protection Agency? How do you know that he has not registered a complaint with ACPE? How do you know that he has not spoken with the pharmacy academic community through AACP? For that matter, how do you know that he is not me? (Except that it would not be characteristic of him to defend himself as I have done) Oftentimes I have double-checked the accuracy of information that I have posted here with him. Oftentimes, I've run my advice that's been posted on this website by him for his reaction first. So to me, if I've done anything to help HICP students and the profession, it's been at least in part attributable to him.
Also, what would you have had him do? Take out a full page ad in some publication saying "Don't go to HICP"? Then Monroe and Criswell would have sued him. Remember, that whether you like it or not, there was no agency in Hawaii preventing them from starting a school (there is an agency in Nevada, by the way, that has oversight over private post-secondary institutions, who issues licenses for these schools to operate, provided that the schools meet their standards--why not talk about what's wrong with the system in Hawaii that allows such things to occur?)
If there was such a great connection, why wasn't Monroe urging skeptical students to call Rosenberg/USN and verify it for themselves? One answer: He couldn't, because then he would have been exposed. Didn't students who saw the "Rosenberg Table" at the White Coat ceremony not have Rosenberg present wonder what was going on? Should that not have been a clue?
Perhaps the only thing I would concede is that perhaps the disclaimer didn't go far enough and perhaps they should have gone after HICP for plagiarizing USN information on their website, but then again, despite HICP's laughable attemps to trademark everything, you can't really trademark a school policy or a curriculum. They certainly didn't have permission to rip off USN's website information and not long after the disclaimer was issued, HICP's website content was changed. Hindsight is always 20-20, and I can't say that knowing what is known now, that USN would or wouldn't have done exactly the same thing.
So, I'd appreciate it if you all would lay off USN and Rosenberg. To be honest with you, most of the information that any of the USN faculty and administration got regarding HICP was by reading SDN--myself included. So SDN is to be congratulated for bringing much of this to light and if Monroe and Criswell are stopped, then SDN will have played a significant role; however, on the flip side, there has also been much misinformation/speculation posted on SDN that unfortunately, is not helpful. But all in all, I think the now 1200+ SDN posts on HICP have been useful in several respects.
What concerns me now, though is "what is the end-game?" This is truly a lose-lose situation for anyone who has been at HICP, and I just don't know what outcome would change that. The only thing one could say is that at least it won't happen to anyone else and hopefully a dental school won't be the next thing.