I don't know any law so correct me if I'm wrong, but the standard for a civil lawsuit isn't innocent until proven guilty. So imagine at a court hearing, a lawyer presenting:
My clients were given offers of acceptances after two highly thorough, vetting processes: the secondary and post-interview. If everything on the application was listed factually, then it's not as though my clients "lied" about their AP credits, ect. Transcripts were verified by AACOAMS, and even as part of pre-matriculation requirements, Touro received official transcripts from the students undergraduate institutions.
After perusing the TouroCOM website, there is no indication whatsoever in the matriculation requirements, the undergraduate requirements, or the student handbook that the COM will or will not accept AP credits. The error of omission falls on the problem of Touro, not the students as to specify their policy. The students, at the moment of acceptance, had complied with all of Touro's requirements for acceptance. They had the minimum required English/Math/Biology/Inorganic/Organic Chem/Physics and MCAT requirement.
Even if the school decided to change it's policy, the fact that they did ONE MONTH before summer class started indicates severe negligence on the part of the school for not notifying students earlier, especially when many of these students had received their acceptances months ago. Furthermore, why would the school suddenly change it's policy at the conclusion of the application cycle as they are attempting to fill and mold their incoming class? As stated before, negligence at it's best, unethical and scamming at it's worst.