Really? Quote me on that. Where did I say that? What I did say was why would most students go to Touro when there are 5 excellent schools out there? Which noone btw has replied to me. I asked in pre pharmacy boards before and most of the guys agree with me that the reason they are applying is they couldnt get into any other pharmcy school. Sparda for example lives in Long island but chose not to go to either LIU or SJU which would be closer.
You guys are all saying the same thing that Touro is a lower tier pharmacy school which is what I have been saying. I have no idea what you guys are trying to prove in respond to my post. Are you guys seriously thinking that you can debate Touro being a diploma mill or that it is a lower tier (even though I said that it is automatically lower tier because of lack of research?).
Let me break it down.
We all know new schools (including Touro) are lower tiered when compared to the candidate, and fully accredited schools.
Sure, new schools on average do accept a higher percentage of students with lower stats than fully accredited schools. Why? Because students with higher stats usually receive multiple acceptances and they do prefer an established and fully accredited school. That leaves the new schools with everyone else; many who received only one or two acceptance(s).
This is a common trend for new schools. Most of us already know this.
What many of us have an issue with is not the fact Touro is a new school and have much to improve in the coming years; hence, usually, considered a lower tier school.
It is when you assume "most" Touro graduates are going to do more harm to the profession than good that is disconcerting to me. This attack ultimately puts most of the blame only on the students when we all know the school was established by members of the pharmacy profession who graduated from other New York Pharmacy schools.
If you're going to tell prospective students to retake classes and apply to another school, why don't you call Touro and urge them to close down. While you're at it, you can also call Rutgers and tell them to tone it down on the number of graduates they produce. (200 to 250?)
My point is complain all you want. That's fine. I do it all the time. Just know when you talk the talk; only to put down a person or a group of people, make sure you understand people don't like to get generalized. As I stated before. A good pharmacist or pharmacy student should be judged on his or her own abilities, desires, and merits.
Having said that, I know you've read a lot of negative posts regarding Touro programs. Unless you've worked with a few Touro NY college of pharmacy students, and observed their work, how do you know "most" of them are inferior to their colleagues in the other schools?
Well, you don't know yet, because they haven't started their summer IPPEs. Before the students had the opportunities to show everyone what they got, you are already writing them off.
Overall, your reasoning is Since Most or all new schools are lower tier, then most of the students who graduate from new schools won't make good pharmacists?
Ultimately, these pharmacists from new schools are doing more harm to the pharmacy profession than good?? Absolutely false!
IMO, what I think you are trying to convey is: "Given our poor economic conditions, pharmacy graduates from new and older New York pharmacy schools will both contribute to an already saturated NYC pharmacy job market. The increasing over supply of pharmacists in NYC can potentially do more harm than good to the prospects of finding a good pharmacy job in NYC."
Bottom Line: Unless you've had experience working with the school, its students and its graduates, One should Not assume that a particular Lower tier School will almost always produce lower Tier pharmacy Students and poor pharmacists.