Pictures of the Week

Started by Epidural
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Genicular RFA is an underperforming procedure, but I may get those patients too late in the course. I only offer to post TKA patients.
 
Thanks for sharing this! I hadn't seen it.

This study did suggest that 5 nerves (adding IPBSN and recurrent fibular) might work better than 3, but the improvement seems so marginal that I don't know if it's worth it. Comparing effectiveness of 3-needle approach versus 5-needle approach of genicular nerve block on pain and quality of life in chronic osteoarthritis of knee: a double blinded randomised controlled trial - PMC

I personally really love this study of 15 cadavers by Peng, where he created a heat map of the genicular nerves. Anatomical Study of the Innervation of Anterior Knee Joint Capsule: Implication for Image-Guided Intervention - PubMed

2506.jpg


I think the infrapatellar branch has way too much variability to reliably RF, and it's so superficial I'm afraid of lesioning the skin. The superior lateral genicular nerve seems to have a lot of variability too, so I've been doing either bipolar or a second lesion for that spot.

I've personally found genicular RF to be among my highest satisfaction procedures.

I also wonder if ultrasound my be more accurate or provide better results. Did one case under ultrasound and placed the probe about 1 cm proximal to the corresponding genicular arteries with great results. Too much of a pain in the butt under ultrasound, however.
 
Thanks for sharing this! I hadn't seen it.

This study did suggest that 5 nerves (adding IPBSN and recurrent fibular) might work better than 3, but the improvement seems so marginal that I don't know if it's worth it. Comparing effectiveness of 3-needle approach versus 5-needle approach of genicular nerve block on pain and quality of life in chronic osteoarthritis of knee: a double blinded randomised controlled trial - PMC

I personally really love this study of 15 cadavers by Peng, where he created a heat map of the genicular nerves. Anatomical Study of the Innervation of Anterior Knee Joint Capsule: Implication for Image-Guided Intervention - PubMed

View attachment 413645

I think the infrapatellar branch has way too much variability to reliably RF, and it's so superficial I'm afraid of lesioning the skin. The superior lateral genicular nerve seems to have a lot of variability too, so I've been doing either bipolar or a second lesion for that spot.

I've personally found genicular RF to be among my highest satisfaction procedures.

I also wonder if ultrasound my be more accurate or provide better results. Did one case under ultrasound and placed the probe about 1 cm proximal to the corresponding genicular arteries with great results. Too much of a pain in the butt under ultrasound, however.
I wouldn't ever target recurrent fibular nerve given the obvious risks associated with fibular nerve being in proximity.

I also second success/patient satisfaction with genicular RFA. It has to be effective since it may be the most painful procedure I perform, and patients keep coming back...
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Definitely never do anything you're not comfortable with!

I've never done personally targeted the recurrent fibular, but it seems reasonable for patients who greatest pain is anterior, or especially anterolateral and inferior.

If you're hitting the anterior tibia at the lateral aspect of its cortex, at the level of the fib head, you'd be well away from the peroneal nerve, which is still posterior and hasn't reach the fib neck yet (check it out on ultrasound!).
 
Jokes aside, has anyone else read this paper?


It shows different targets than classically taught (to be clear, the pic above is terrible by classical or this paper's standards)

Curious what people think
Yeah I do standard for one burn, modified for second burn. So much anatomic variability that even doing that with 18 ga sidekick I'm skeptical that I'm really hitting them
 
I wouldn't ever target recurrent fibular nerve given the obvious risks associated with fibular nerve being in proximity.

I also second success/patient satisfaction with genicular RFA. It has to be effective since it may be the most painful procedure I perform, and patients keep coming back...
Agree, I find people are generally very happy with results but it definitely seems to hurt like hell for most people. Did one today and the lady was miserable despite 3cc of 2% lido down each cannula for a full 2 min prior.

Anyone have any magic ways of making it hurt less?
 
Agree, I find people are generally very happy with results but it definitely seems to hurt like hell for most people. Did one today and the lady was miserable despite 3cc of 2% lido down each cannula for a full 2 min prior.

Anyone have any magic ways of making it hurt less?
I’ve tried lots of things. Lately I infiltrated 1% lido slowly on the way in with the RF needle, then get to target depth, pull back a cm and inject 2% lido as I push it back in. Seems to help but some still have trouble.
 
I wouldn't ever target recurrent fibular nerve given the obvious risks associated with fibular nerve being in proximity.

I also second success/patient satisfaction with genicular RFA. It has to be effective since it may be the most painful procedure I perform, and patients keep coming back...
I try not to address these branches unless absolutely necessary. I hit this less than 10% of the time and wouldn't recommend without ultrasound. You can usually find some small branches that are far medial and superior to the common peroneal nerve traversing inferior/lateral to the fibular head. In general, I'm far more concerned with how superficial these nerves are (and close to the joint capsule in TKA cases) than how close to the common peroneal they are.
 
Screenshot 2026-01-08 150821.png


Not seen by me. Rheumatology (partner) was consulted for neck/b/l arm pain from Neurosurgery. MRI with mild DDD and mild canal stenosis C5-6, C6-7.
These Xrays done 2 months earlier. Patient reports a fall hitting head. Neg MRI brain or T-spine. MRI's done to r/o MS as + Lhermitte's. Xray report read as negative. Guess why I am posting?
 
View attachment 413757

Not seen by me. Rheumatology (partner) was consulted for neck/b/l arm pain from Neurosurgery. MRI with mild DDD and mild canal stenosis C5-6, C6-7.
These Xrays done 2 months earlier. Patient reports a fall hitting head. Neg MRI brain or T-spine. MRI's done to r/o MS as + Lhermitte's. Xray report read as negative. Guess why I am posting?
I'll give it a shot. Flex/ex XR shows a grade 1 anterolisthesis most prominent at C4 on C5. Sadly, could be a missed SCI around that level from acute cervical extension leading to a central cord syndrome.
 
I have the local anesthetic for genicular RFA figured out. The key is to put the c arm in lateral and take a local needle from lateral to medial to the area you target and drop in 1-2ml .5% ropi. It takes less than a minute to do all 3. Then you go to AP, 1% lido for the skin and as deep as the local needle will go. Place your rf needles. 2% lido through the rf needles. I then get the probes out and let the MA test motors. I know it isn’t needed but we are just killing time and they aren’t capable of knowing when or when not to test motors. Then lesion. They went from crying out to chilling after I added the initial ropi. It probably has 8 minutes before you start ablating to work.
 
there isnt significant soft tissue swelling and that anterolisthesis is minor i can see why rads called it normal.

the protocol i used for neck injury after fall with negative xrays and persistent pain is to get an MRI scan in ER or to send home patient home in a cervical collar and get MRI scan 4 weeks after.
 
there isnt significant soft tissue swelling and that anterolisthesis is minor i can see why rads called it normal.

the protocol i used for neck injury after fall with negative xrays and persistent pain is to get an MRI scan in ER or to send home patient home in a cervical collar and get MRI scan 4 weeks after.
She had MRI. C5-6 and C6-7 mild stenosis, no listhesis at C4-5.
But there is 3mm slip in flexion and 0mm in extension.

Instability defined as: 2mm flex/ext or 3.5mm static.
 
so you think that explains radicular neck and arm pain? (you didnt comment about motor weakness or sensory loss...)

theres no listhesis and mild spinal stenosis on MRI scan and no T2 changes, so doesnt sound like central cord syndrome due to the injury.



what is your plan?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
She had MRI. C5-6 and C6-7 mild stenosis, no listhesis at C4-5.
But there is 3mm slip in flexion and 0mm in extension.

Instability defined as: 2mm flex/ext or 3.5mm static.
there is a lot of ROM with this woman. you will probably see some amount of instability when there is that big of range on flex/ext. not surgical.
 
so you think that explains radicular neck and arm pain? (you didnt comment about motor weakness or sensory loss...)

theres no listhesis and mild spinal stenosis on MRI scan and no T2 changes, so doesnt sound like central cord syndrome due to the injury.



what is your plan?
My impression is neck pain with bilateral arm pain means rule out central etiology (ie dynamic instability causing central canal compression). @lobelsteve mentioned +Lhermittes which prompted MRI to r/o spinal injury.
Central cord should reveals something on the MRI right? Signal change?
Definitely would expect T2 weighted changes. Usually, MRI only misses this in the immediate post injury setting before edema sets in (first few hours)

@lobelsteve curious if she has UE weakness or subtle dexterity issues
 
She had MRI. C5-6 and C6-7 mild stenosis, no listhesis at C4-5.
But there is 3mm slip in flexion and 0mm in extension.

Instability defined as: 2mm flex/ext or 3.5mm static.
I think you're wrong here Steve. Instability is defined as 3.5mm on flex/ext, not static flims. When did this change?
 
Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) use the below definition, hence using the below numbers:
3.5mm on F/E, or 11 degree angular change-> instability

I am not saying that lesser numbers could not be, I am just saying thats where they arbitrarily drew the line
 
I’ve seen lots of clefts before in compression fractures, but don’t think I’ve seen this much air on the x-ray, including AP. 8cc densely filled in that void.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8041.jpeg
    IMG_8041.jpeg
    180 KB · Views: 110
  • IMG_8048.jpeg
    IMG_8048.jpeg
    417.4 KB · Views: 119
  • IMG_8047.jpeg
    IMG_8047.jpeg
    478.6 KB · Views: 188
  • IMG_8053.jpeg
    IMG_8053.jpeg
    248.9 KB · Views: 138
  • IMG_8052.jpeg
    IMG_8052.jpeg
    331.9 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_8051.jpeg
    IMG_8051.jpeg
    210.5 KB · Views: 113
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Intrathecal?

Contrast crossed over and epidural fat blobs are visible.


IMG_9953.jpeg



Thought that was odd, pulled back far enough I am lateral in the foramen and mostly getting nerve root pattern and it still crossed midline.


IMG_9952.jpeg



Got a lateral.

IMG_9951.jpeg


Aspiration negative for CSF.
 
Intrathecal?

Contrast crossed over and epidural fat blobs are visible.

Thought that was odd, pulled back far enough I am lateral in the foramen and mostly getting nerve root pattern and it still crossed midline.

Got a lateral.

Aspiration negative for CSF.
Yeah, nice nerve root sheath with wrapping around from the ventral space is my guess. Get a STAT CT next time so I can know if I'm right?
 
Am I missing something? Contralateral spread is very normal for TFESI and, if anything, probably suggests good ventral spread into the epidural space. 6 mL of injectate has been shown to spread contralateral in most patients (Comparison of Epidural Spreading Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection with High-Volume Injectate via the Subpedicular Versus the Retrodiscal Approach - PubMed) though I'm sure it eventually spreads contralateral with smaller volumes, assuming the injection is epidural and not just nerve root.
 
Am I missing something? Contralateral spread is very normal for TFESI and, if anything, probably suggests good ventral spread into the epidural space. 6 mL of injectate has been shown to spread contralateral in most patients (Comparison of Epidural Spreading Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection with High-Volume Injectate via the Subpedicular Versus the Retrodiscal Approach - PubMed) though I'm sure it eventually spreads contralateral with smaller volumes, assuming the injection is epidural and not just nerve root.

I don’t think I can tell you the last time I saw contralateral spread off a TF. It was crossing over with 0.2cc of contrast. Like, first few drops crossed over.
 
Osteopetrosis? MRI L spine with very dark bones on T1 and T2. Patient was sent for consult regarding Intracept, and she does have some Modic changes, but I’m very hesitant about the idea of trying to get through that bone. Sending her to endocrinology for a consult.
IMG_5055.jpeg
 
Osteopetrosis? MRI L spine with very dark bones on T1 and T2. Patient was sent for consult regarding Intracept, and she does have some Modic changes, but I’m very hesitant about the idea of trying to get through that bone. Sending her to endocrinology for a consult.
View attachment 415217

Paget's looking to me.
 
Onset/presentation at her age? Favors pagets or similar. Cancer and myelofibrosis on list.
Decades of msk pain. She’s had labs done and presumably prior imaging, and supposedly a DEXA, but all I had was this and MRIs. Thanks for bringing up myelofibrosis, maybe I’ll order at least a CBC and metabolic panel. I have a patient of a similar age with osteopetrosis (obviously a mild form).
 
Osteopetrosis? MRI L spine with very dark bones on T1 and T2. Patient was sent for consult regarding Intracept, and she does have some Modic changes, but I’m very hesitant about the idea of trying to get through that bone. Sending her to endocrinology for a consult.
I would consider it with a Stryker system and a bone biopsy/power drill to get access
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Hanging drop in 2026?
Haha tough crowd in the comments too
 
This is what I’m talking about
Yep. Absolutele ****e. Weird how a procedure doesn’t work when someone does it poorly. Here’s mine from yesterday with 100% relief. A little bursty. Waited till cement was very thick, inject small volume slowly, take breaks to harden and seal off cracks.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8592.jpeg
    IMG_8592.jpeg
    588.2 KB · Views: 146
  • IMG_8593.jpeg
    IMG_8593.jpeg
    188.8 KB · Views: 96
  • IMG_8595.jpeg
    IMG_8595.jpeg
    230.3 KB · Views: 103
  • IMG_8596.jpeg
    IMG_8596.jpeg
    285.8 KB · Views: 142
  • IMG_8597.jpeg
    IMG_8597.jpeg
    274.7 KB · Views: 122