Yeah, yeah, but I don't view the gap between various o chem courses as the same as the gap between majors. I've taken science courses at CC, UMass Boston, BU, and Harvard Extension and while there is definitely a gradient, again, some of those majors are essentially vanity projects by whimsical faculty which contain no content beyond the understanding of a middle schooler. Of course the MCAT is more standardized, but the flip side of the argument is that you're talking years of sGPA data versus a single test that doesn't penalize guessing, which introduces a modest degree of randomness in another way.
But yeah, I obviously wouldn't worry about the lib arts student with a 526. Either way, I'm fine with disagreeing.
I was more taking a shot at "(anything) studies", but my point isn't that those majors are for dumb people. It's that graduating with them doesn't prove much about what you're working with one way or the other. You proved yourself on the mcat, and presumably, in your prereqs.