- Joined
- May 3, 2006
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
Any thoughts about which is more difficult to obtain in our ever changing world. Did any of you out there have a hard time choosing between the two?
fiddler1 said:Any thoughts about which is more difficult to obtain in our ever changing world. Did any of you out there have a hard time choosing between the two?
chicamedica said:I considered EM early in med school before I even knew what the practice of anesthesiology entailed, but as I rotated through both fields during MS3 I realized that EM, in practice, was like 90% primary care & triage, and only like 10% resuscitation/trauma, if even that much. During my EM rotation, even if a trauma did arrive, the EM residents stayed with the less acute patients while the surgical trauma team and the anesthesiology resident on call (and maybe ONE em attending) would rush over to the trauma. (and the latter was more interesting to me). The triaging of ED patients was also disappointing in a way because we'd start all this work-up, but we'd sometimes not even see the results or find out what pathology the patient ended up having. But otherwise, it's a fun specialty, and i suppose you can do rotations with paramedics and go out into the field to get to resuscitate very acute patients. imo, anesthesiology is much more complex in terms of thinking about physiological changes on a minute-to-minute or sec-to-sec basis, and that challenge was one of the things that swayed me towards anesthesiology and away from EM. However, in EM you get to diagnose a broader span of pathology, like orthopedic problems, dermatologic issues, etc (even though where i'm at, at least with the ortho, the ortho resident on call is the one who ends up taking care of the fractures, etc). Another difference between the two is that in EM, you juggle like 3-4 different patients at the same time (and in a rushed way at that), while in anesthesiology you focus 100% on each patient individually from start to finish. I personally prefer the latter dynamic, because in the ED i feel like I'm not devoting as much attention to each patient as i would have liked. even though i could function in a multitasking environment, i'd rather do something like FP or IM where i actually get to do some follow up and where I can pay more attention to each patient than in a place like the ED.
I mean, these are all aspects that were personal decision for me. It all depends on the dynamic that you prefer and that you thrive in, as well as your vision of what the practice of medicine is most meaningful to you. You should do some introspection and decide that for yourself. For example, some people thrive on chaos and find anesthesiology too mundane. There is some overlap in commonly encountered concepts, especially as far as resuscitation, and some pharmacology go. however, the two fields also deal with different knowledge bases, so whichever one is more interesting to you, should also factor into your desicion.
fiddler1 said:Any thoughts about which is more difficult to obtain in our ever changing world. Did any of you out there have a hard time choosing between the two?
Noyac said:. Best choice I ever made. At least for me that is.
nimbus said:I know several ER docs who switched to anesthesia, but not the other way around. That said, my best friend is an ER doc who can't stop talking about his work whenever we get together.