- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 992
- Reaction score
- 0
What happened to Jolie South, the mod?
I am here, all will be solved with my soothing textual replies henceforth.
Rearranging the chairs on the deck of the titanic.
meet the Obama generation, everybody.
ill be watering my chiaa obama pet while waiting for change.
Symmetry is a primary psychological determinant of attractiveness.
What happened to Jolie South, the mod?
I can't really make any comments about "other posts" since I have no idea what that's about -- another reason why you should talk to mods specifically about any issues you have. None of us on this thread know the entire story, whereas a discussion with the mods means you're talking to someone who knows the history of what's going on.
Anyway, what exactly do you mean by transparency? You talk a lot about "justice" and "improvement" but seriously, what SPECIFICALLY do you want to be done here? How exactly was Caesar supposed to respond when you made that post calling him ridiculous? By responding to you, he showed he was willing to talk things out -- I don't really get what extra "justice" you get that wasn't available by just talking it through with a mod.
I think we can all agree that the youtube comment was offensive. Regardless of whether or not it was your original words, they became your words when you posted it on this forum. He followed protocol and gave you a warning.
Hi bobsmith, you really have to read the previous posts, so that I dont have to retype everything that I said.
I feel that more transparency could be given. However, what is a good first step would be to mods to suggest to a user that something is inappropriate, before laying down a punishment, any punishment.
Once again, he started with, "you should know you are wrong, lots of your posts are inappropriate". Coming from a lawgiver, that itself is inappropriate.
I want transparency because I wanted to talk to Caesar HERE, and not all of you guys. I wanted to discuss it with him HERE. If its not public, little improvements can be made (hence Obama and his transparency)
As we had in a previous analogy that not even I came up with.
I have long hair, so I must have long hair.
Colgate said X, so he must have said X.
As simple as that. Drawing any further inferences, is hurtful towards my character as a person, and also more importantly, the feeling of being framed for something that I would have never intended.
Hopefully this is a good enough explanation.
I will not post in this thread any further, I realized my mistakes of using unnecessary terminology like "ridiculous" and it has affected what I really wanted to achieve tonight.
I hope that if I did waste your time, it was an enjoyable one, and I would like to direct us to my other post. A post that is truly what I want to share.
Hi bobsmith, you really have to read the previous posts, so that I dont have to retype everything that I said.
I feel that more transparency could be given. However, what is a good first step would be to mods to suggest to a user that something is inappropriate, before laying down a punishment, any punishment.
Once again, he started with, "you should know you are wrong, lots of your posts are inappropriate". Coming from a lawgiver, that itself is inappropriate.
I want transparency because I wanted to talk to Caesar HERE, and not all of you guys. I wanted to discuss it with him HERE. If its not public, little improvements can be made (hence Obama and his transparency)
As we had in a previous analogy that not even I came up with.
I have long hair, so I must have long hair.
Colgate said X, so he must have said X.
As simple as that. Drawing any further inferences, is hurtful towards my character as a person, and also more importantly, the feeling of being framed for something that I would have never intended.
Hopefully this is a good enough explanation.
I will not post in this thread any further, I realized my mistakes of using unnecessary terminology like "ridiculous" and it has affected what I really wanted to achieve tonight.
I hope that if I did waste your time, it was an enjoyable one, and I would like to direct us to my other post. A post that is truly what I want to share.
If I only cared only when lives are involved then I just dont care enough.
I want us to be able to discuss in peace, I want us to be able to speak our minds freely, and when misunderstandings occur, I want us to be able to discuss and resolve it without resorting to punishment immediately.
That is all.
Its not about the severity of the punishment. It is about how the punishment was laid out.
About how misunderstandings can lead to even more misunderstandings.
And how we can all improve on SDN.
In ftw
Go the SDN donation page, and donate $50 to become a 2 year member and donor.
Then when you go insane and type things you will later regret, and are upset that such content remains as people "quote it', you can just delete the thread entirely.
This thread has accomplished something important for many of you, but mostly bannie22, namely major Post Padding. Well done. I'm in. [Only 16 are viewing this thread right now.]
Congrats!Woohoo! Post #200 for me!
where is the original thread/ post that started this firestorm? Summary someone?
Who cares? If you got banned tonight and no one ever heard from you again, nobody here would care and you'd be forgotten in a heartbeat.
definitely smokin something.dude, what are you smoking? hook it up