“He quickly grooms you in the relationship,” she claims.
pagesix.com
Anyone think this is just weird? Not the cannibalism fantasy, but the fact that having a fetish/kink is cancelling people? Is this where the metoo movement is going? Just destroying men you don’t like? If you read the allegation of emotional abuse it the person is literally painting normal relationship arch as abuse : roses and butterflies at first and then fizzling out. Have Republican men been right all along about feminism? Also lol at the headline.
Ok, since YOU brought it up...
1) I think having a "cannibalism fantasy" (your words) IS weird. Apparently you do not.
2) There is a difference between a fetish/kink and a psychopathy. One typically does not require (the fantasizing about or the committing of) murder/maiming followed by ingestion of another human's flesh.
3) Who says his desire was purely "fantasy"? Just because he didn't follow through with his statements to this girlfriend doesn't mean that he didn't engage in the behavior elsewhere, does it?
4) The difficult and horrible truth is there are a lot of sickos hiding in plain sight, often times protected by their wealth and status.
5) Whenever one of these sickos or their sicko stomping grounds is discovered and their secrecy is blown, there is always a 2-pronged media strategy employed: 1) Down play the statements/events from reality to just a bizarre joke or misunderstanding (which is easy to do since the average mentally-healthy person tends to find it very difficult to wrap their brain around the existence of such psychopathies and prefers, perhaps as a defense mechanism, to dismiss them as just sick jokes/harmless fetishes, and 2) The (financially controlled and socially directed) media/internet will attempt to make these rumors go away by a barrage of dismissive articles about the said event, other articles that attempt to normalize this behavior, and certain sources will out right claim that the rumors have been "debunked." All of these strategies have been deployed in this case.
6) When the masses do open their eyes and try to think or research for themselves, they will be pointed in the direction of these 'reliable sources of debunkitude' and if you don't accept their 'expert claims' on face value you will be swiftly labeled a conspiracy theorist. Next you'll probably be banned for saying that you just don't simply believe something because some people say that it is true, that you can analyze human nature and moral frailty even when it is difficult to acknowledge, and you'd prefer to rely on your own toolkit. That toolkit being your own lifetime of common sense, logic, intelligence (IQ and EQ), analytical skills (digestion/dismissal/acceptance of data), and, last but not least, a solid moral clarity that only comes from looking within and never from looking at society as a whole.
Has he partaken in cannibalism in the past or does he have a cannibalism fantasy? I have my thoughts and you have yours.
Should he be "cancelled" due to his cannibalism or cannibalism fantasy? I have my thoughts and you have yours.
The real question is: What are you basing your thoughts on and on what am I basing mine?