For me, I do believe of course that a graduate of a three year program has more experience and knowledge than after PGY1. This is obvious. But the question is whether someone who starts working after PGY1 will acquire the same amount of knowledge and experience on their own. I believe that the latter option is very viable. Most of my learning today is self taught as I see patients. 90% of what I’m learning is without being taught by an attending. If I’m out on my own, I’ll need to be even more on my toes. The steep learning curve as an attending/solo practitioner will exist whether after 1 year or 3 years. Yes, a PGY1 is less experienced, but can he make up for that by using appropriate resources? That’s pretty much what I’m doing now as a resident anyway.
I am planning to do DPC where the above mentioned insurance and hospital privilege issues don’t apply. I’ll also have sufficient time in that setting to look things up if needed.
What there really needs to be is an alternate pathway to board certification like there once was. Work for a certain number of years following internship, earn a certain number of CME credits, and then take board exam to qualify.