I am passionate about reducing student loan debt, Panis. I respect you for your efforts too.
But I'm not going to vote for the federal government to gain the powers to restrict how much private businesses (dental schools) can charge for their services. That sets up a dangerous precedent of regulation that I will vote no to every single time. What if the government later says "You cannot charge more than $10 for a filling?"
Now, if you want to cap how much federal loans the government will offer, that is something I can get behind. Less federal loan amount available = students can't pay for the expensive schools = school forced to lower prices to stay open or go out of business.
I agree with you, but unfortunately with that reduced cost the funds will have to come from elsewhere. Some possible examples:
-Increased clinic fee schedule. This can impact patient flow and treatment plan acceptance, which impacts curriculum.
-Reduced spending on materials. This impacts clinic & lab. Stuff will get older, breaks etc. All with a reduced budget for replacement.
-Payroll cuts. Here you may have reduced administrative support due to layoffs, or lower quality support due to employee turnover. Most importantly, many good clinical instructors may not be willing to take a paycut. Why get even less pay after already being in academia? This of course would also impact training.
The money has to come from somewhere. Just because State schools charge less does not mean that their costs are significantly different. They get funding from the State government, not to mention the many tax benefits of being a public entity.
Don't quote me on this, but if I were to take some educated guesses, Private universities do not receive these types of subsidies. They are likely required to pay into whichever State/local municipality they are located in. So while the public schools are receiving tax funding, the private universities are paying taxes to the state. Now that I think about it, it's kind of cyclical; the taxes the private schools are paying fund the State's public school. This of course is all dependent on not having a Nonprofit designation.
Another possibility to consider is that it may price out many applicants; catering more to a Pay-To-Play population of aspiring dentists, instead of being merit-based. I would also take the educated guess that the number of international applicants who matriculate would go up significantly. They are not eligible for federal loans, but thats not stopping them because there is currently no shortage of international applicants.
I can't speculate what would/wouldn't happen if federal loans were capped, I'm just trying to illustrate that there are lots of possibilites to consider besides simply a supply/demand based model of cost inflation.
But again, I absolutely agree with you regarding the dangerous precedent of government restriction on fees and services. It would be catastrophic.