I actually no of him.....he apparently had amazing EC and is also the type of person who would do really good in an interview as well
what's EC?
I actually no of him.....he apparently had amazing EC and is also the type of person who would do really good in an interview as well
what's EC?
EC= extra curriculars...lol....i thought i would attempt to be cool and shorten it lol
I was just wondering, does the UBC pharmacy admission committee discriminate against students who did most of their prereq's at other schools? (Langara, Kwantlen)
Are they more likely to accept people with ok marks from UBC than people with high marks from those other schools?
I don't know if answering this question will violate any rules, but I'll ask just in case:
are there questions that test your knowledge of drugs (eg., drug action of common drugs, common drug names and what they are for...etc) or questions on current (health-related) events? Are there question pertaining to UBC Pharmacy specifically (should I spend time looking at the structure and background of the Pharmacy school, as I would when applying for a job at a company?)
Many thanks,
P.S. @starstrike: were you able to get a hold of the questions before you had the interview, or did you walk in blinded??
I don't know what the selecting criteria they used in my case. I am graduate student with GPA around 83%(both undergrad and grad), as well as 97% at PCAT. I got a rejection letter!
Anyway UBC pharmacy is just my backup, but even still~~~
When I went in for my interview I didn't have any old questions; I had to go in cold turkey. The way I prepared for my interview was by looking up typical job interview questions and trying to answer those in a quick and concise manner. I found that really helped me out.
I don't know what the selecting criteria they used in my case. I am graduate student with GPA around 83%(both undergrad and grad), as well as 97% at PCAT. I got a rejection letter!
Anyway UBC pharmacy is just my backup, but even still~~~
Hi~
I don't think it's just about PCAT + marks.
They primarily look at why you actually want to become a pharmacist, and look for the following:
1. relevant experience in pharmacy
2. EC to supplement attributes required for being a successful pharmacist
3. reference letters - to validate that you are a wonderful person
4. essay - to check your passion for becoming a pharmacist
I personally believe the 4 things are more important than just marks + PCATS because there are variances between courses taken, school that you were in, courseload, etc. But if I were you, I would definitely contact the school and ask for the reasons why you were not offered an interview. Hope that helps!
OH ONE MORE THING --> I know someone who was also rejected because their tone seemed like they put pharmacy as their backup. Why would schools offer acceptance to you if you think of them as a back up?
Wow, I can't believe some people are being interviewed right now! Mine's tomorrow... I'm nervous but kind of excited!
Colanring: if you say your gpa is 83 for both grad and undergrad, that's not the number that they will use - they only use the prerequisite courses and courses that are equivalent to those in the Pharmacy program. So if you didn't do as well in your 1st year courses your admission gpa would be much lower. I don't know if that helps.
Good luck to everyone
If that's the case, I have a even higher GPA because my best two years are first year and fourth year. Anyway it's done and no one can change it.
I had my interview on Tuesday. I was surprised that my interviewers were really nice and responded well to my answers because I heard last year a lot of the interviewers were unemotional and robotic. Good luck to everyone going tomorrow, remember to RELAX and be in the moment.
I wouldn't worry about the acceptance letters till Monday?
Did any of the interviewers ask you guys to give them additional information at the end/ ask them any questions ? I was at 30minutes exactly and they didn't give me the chance to ask anything, but I know that last year's interviewers let candidates make extra comments at the end of the interview. Maybe it was because I went over 25min?!
does any1 noe who exactly makes the decisions? not the interviewers themselves rite? i was just wondering cuz since not every1 was interviewed by the same people.
I was wondering if the quality of your answers and the quality of your exp. are important? They said that there was no right or wrong answers. So long as you can think of an ex and answer the question logically, as long as they take notes on all of your answers and you sounded confident and speak clearly and consisely? I hope so because I just realized how lame my accomplishment sounded and some of my behavioural answers were based on school instead of my work exp.