- Joined
- May 19, 2016
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 11
I'm a junior in MIMG/Microbio (Path 2) at UCLA. Currently 3.5c/3.2s with some ECs and research under my belt; will take the new MCAT before coming back for senior year. Though I can graduate in fall by major reqs completion, I may stick around to do GPA repair. May as well use that financial aid while I still can. Anyone from UCLA know some good, preferably upper-div (better than lower-div, right?) sGPA repair classes? I'm thinking astronomy and psychology, but are there more/am I wrong? Also, is 185A (really the nightmare people say it is) feasible on top of 180B+196B, or would I be better pushing it to winter and taking "easier" classes alongside it?
I'll also be taking a gap year to work at the hospitals or clinics; haven't applied anywhere yet. Is MA or scribe a better option as far as clinical experience? I like the idea of scribing because I can write/type decently fast and potentially being able to help the doctor diagnose (more likely developing my own diagnosing skill XD) seems more valuable than administrative work--but from the thread I read here, MAs may be more likely to take vitals, draw blood, etc., which gives a hands-on aspect that I would really like. (Of course, it could be a case-by-case basis...)
I've gathered from my reading that formal post-baccs redo science prereqs, so I likely won't qualify for those. What are the pros and cons of DIY post-bacc and Masters? From my reading here, neither option boosts one's chances of getting into an affiliated med school (ie UCLA post-bacc doesn't boost DGSOM admission chances), and Master's doesn't even affect/boost your AMCAS GPA and is also less valued than post-bacc. I ask because my mom is dead-set on me getting a Masters at Touro University in California precisely because she thinks it will improve my AMCAS standing.
Thanks!
I'll also be taking a gap year to work at the hospitals or clinics; haven't applied anywhere yet. Is MA or scribe a better option as far as clinical experience? I like the idea of scribing because I can write/type decently fast and potentially being able to help the doctor diagnose (more likely developing my own diagnosing skill XD) seems more valuable than administrative work--but from the thread I read here, MAs may be more likely to take vitals, draw blood, etc., which gives a hands-on aspect that I would really like. (Of course, it could be a case-by-case basis...)
I've gathered from my reading that formal post-baccs redo science prereqs, so I likely won't qualify for those. What are the pros and cons of DIY post-bacc and Masters? From my reading here, neither option boosts one's chances of getting into an affiliated med school (ie UCLA post-bacc doesn't boost DGSOM admission chances), and Master's doesn't even affect/boost your AMCAS GPA and is also less valued than post-bacc. I ask because my mom is dead-set on me getting a Masters at Touro University in California precisely because she thinks it will improve my AMCAS standing.
Thanks!
Last edited: