I contacted Dr. Wilcox, and he said that if you did not receive an invitation on Friday, then you were not selected for an interview.
... 🙁
🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁
I'm going to send him an email also because of my application problems
I contacted Dr. Wilcox, and he said that if you did not receive an invitation on Friday, then you were not selected for an interview.
... 🙁
^^Thank you. I'm so nervous about the interview. I'm worried I'm going to choke up or not know what to say.
I JUST GOT AN INVITE! I'm shaking right now- it was the only school I applied to
Thanks, now I have to start practicing...Congrats!
I have my interview scheduled for Feb 25th. I have limited volunteer experience at a pharmacy. I was wondering if you guys have any advice on how to prepare for the ethical questions or pharmacy questions. I'm really nervous about the interview. My GPA's not exactly competitive so I feel like I have a lot riding on this interview.
I thought my interview (Friday) was pretty tough. I've had three other interviews so far; some of them were easier than others, some were harder but UT was the most difficult as far as testing my knowledge of pharmacy terms/laws and general concept of science, what science is etc.. I feel like I did very well on the questions I knew how to answer, I'll say that, but I def could have done better on some of the ones I didn't really know what he was looking for. My interviewer was def looking for 'specific' answers on a few, as after I answered he put out a "why wouldn't you do this..." scenario before moving on to the next questions.. almost as if to show me where I went wrong..😱 haha but oh well.. I think I did decent overall, I'm just hoping I can stack up against the field applying here; its insanity... I met a guy there with two B.S. degrees, an MBA and an MHA.. and I've seen at least one dude on here applying with a 4.0/99%... haha... The rest of the interview day was very relaxed and informative though. Just make sure you know your stuff for the interview is my advice.
Wait, so the questions you were asked weren't recycled then? Sounds tough...Still having a hard time knowing exactly the best way to prepare!
I don't want to throw anybody off, but for me I wasn't asked anything that I recognized off of SDN except for 'why do you want to be a pharmacist'.. Now, that being said I could have had a 'rogue interviewer' or something (they were a community pharmacist not a faculty in fact..) but I did see someone else post on the interview feedback that they were asked different questions as well, it may be a part of their new admissions process to administer new interview questions I really don't know. But, if I were to retake my same interview over again I would have studied pharmacy terms, maybe you can find some kind of glossary online of pharmacy terms. I would also not spend as much time on the ethical questions that I had read so much about and stressed about, as I wasn't asked any myself. I also would have thought about my research more and been able to explain it better, I was caught off guard with a questions about that. That is what I would have done in my situation, but I can't say what they asked other people. Hope that helps at least a little?
I'll put it this way. I wouldn't want to only study the SDN questions and then end up with my interviewer ( who said hes being doing interview at UT for 10 years now) Its a chance I'd want to be prepared for if I knew what I know now.
Also, make sure you know your essays forward and backward, they have them in the interview and asked several fairly detailed questions from them.
does anybody know anything about this 'z-score' Dr. Wilcox calculates?
I didn't hear him mention it during his talk, but a z-score is a statistical value. If the value is positive, the value you are looking at is above the mean of the population. If the value is negative, it is below the mean. Maybe that is how he is scoring us???
during the last portion, and before the video Dr. Wilcox gave a short talk, an applicant asked how we would be evaluated and he mentioned a 'z-score' he calculates for each applicant from their pcat, gpa, quantified volunteer and experience, and research (no idea how he quantifies it, but hopefully not by hours) and the score determines the order in which applicants are reviewed to ensure fairness (i.e. so that qualified applicants don't get reviewed once all seats are full) just wondering how I might calculate my 'z-score' haha....
I thought my interview (Friday) was pretty tough. I've had three other interviews so far; some of them were easier than others, some were harder but UT was the most difficult as far as testing my knowledge of pharmacy terms/laws and general concept of science, what science is etc.. I feel like I did very well on the questions I knew how to answer, I'll say that, but I def could have done better on some of the ones I didn't really know what he was looking for. My interviewer was def looking for 'specific' answers on a few, as after I answered he put out a "why wouldn't you do this..." scenario before moving on to the next questions.. almost as if to show me where I went wrong..😱 haha but oh well.. I think I did decent overall, I'm just hoping I can stack up against the field applying here; its insanity... I met a guy there with two B.S. degrees, an MBA and an MHA.. and I've seen at least one dude on here applying with a 4.0/99%... haha... The rest of the interview day was very relaxed and informative though. Just make sure you know your stuff for the interview is my advice.
Ekkkkkk what do you mean by pharmacy laws and terms? I know in pharmacy school they have a class specifically for law so I didn't think they would expect us to know that stuff yet. And terms? That's so weird. I'm sure you did better in your interview then you thought. You stats are awesome too so no worries.
Since you guys are mentioning about the z-score, I have one question: how much does the interview matter in regards to everything else (percentage wise?).
I know you cannot do poorly on the interview and expect to get in. but im worried that even if i do well on the interview (i have specific reasons why to come here instead of other schools/why to be a pharmacist), I still may not get in. My gpa and pharmacy experience is solid, but my pcat score is way low (45 comp).
im hoping it doesnt matter (the pcat score) as much now since I got the interview and need to focus on acing interview since its about a month from now. Just asking for advice, any will be appreciated.
Good job to those who have interviewed and good luck to those who are interviewing sometime soon
Hmmmm....I guess I'll need to find a book or google some pharmacy terms that they may potentially ask me.Its nothing to worry too much about, definitely not much of the interview, but you should read up on USP 797 and pharmacy terms at least a little; I checked on interview feedback and it looks like other ppl have gotten some of the same new questions this year so check that out for sure. Seems like somebody got asked what 'pharmacognosy' means, I got asked that questions at my UIC interview actually!
Its nothing to worry too much about, definitely not much of the interview, but you should read up on USP 797 and pharmacy terms at least a little; I checked on interview feedback and it looks like other ppl have gotten some of the same new questions this year so check that out for sure. Seems like somebody got asked what 'pharmacognosy' means, I got asked that questions at my UIC interview actually!
WMW,
I think both of us benefited greatly from SDN for our interviews but please keep in mind that the people you are giving advice to right now are competing for the same spot that you are trying to win. Please do not give them an advantage that those of us who interviewed early did not have. I'm all for providing a lot of advice and I hope that next year's applicants can benefit from anything I can tell them, but as far as this year's applicant pool goes, we are unfortunately forced to be competitors right now.
Sorry to be a hardass, I want to help out other applicants too, but revealing new interview questions for 2011 simply reduces our chances of getting accepted.
It is true that everyone is in competition with each other; I didn't say otherwise. However there is no stopping people, namely the later interviewees, from gaining even slight advantages. I agree with klar06 - WMW didn't reveal anything beyond what is posted in the interview feedback. Feb interviewees have more of an advantage regardless because they have more prep time, more research time, etc.
I understand that you want everyone to have an equal opportunity. I would feel the same. Who wouldn't?
However, your post seemed to me to be less "I don't want others to have unfair advantages" and more "I don't want to be disadvantaged", if that makes any sense. That is what riled me.
But as you are are saying, if this is not what you meant then I apologize for my misunderstanding and for said "personal attacks".
Once again I apologize for not moving this to a private message conversation, but I thought it should be resolved here. Good luck to all!
I just wanna say, don't you think they'd have reason to ask random terms like "what is pharmacognosy?" or "define humanism." Wouldn't they probably ask someone with more pharmacy experience what pharmacognosy is, or ask them questions based on what they read in their essays? I just can't see them randomly saying "can you define humanism for me?" It feels like they want to get to know you and know your thought process and potential...Not test your knowledge on random terms. So is it possible those weren't random questions and were thrown out there 'cause of things you said in your essays?
I just wanna say, don't you think they'd have reason to ask random terms like "what is pharmacognosy?" or "define humanism." Wouldn't they probably ask someone with more pharmacy experience what pharmacognosy is, or ask them questions based on what they read in their essays? I just can't see them randomly saying "can you define humanism for me?" It feels like they want to get to know you and know your thought process and potential...Not test your knowledge on random terms. So is it possible those weren't random questions and were thrown out there 'cause of things you said in your essays?
@Superbean:for those that interviewed. how'd you like the city? Im an LA guy and even though Austin seems to have less of a nightlife than LA/NY, i heard its pretty. anybody have any recommendations on what to do in Austin. first time im going to Austin but ive heard pretty rave reviews about the city. private message if you end up having a long list of restaurants or other places of interest.
my advice is to avoid 6th at all costs, absolutely no matter what. Its a disgusting place, sordid even.. and the drunk idiots who flock there every night make it even worse. What a waste of life. Don't shame yourself.
Austin is a good place to go see live music, especially country music. Also the greenbelt is a great place to hangout, lots of fishing, swimming, disc golf courses, running trails, and rock climbing. Also alot of good art galleries around, especially the smaller ones. Good food too, several great steakhouses and sushi spots close to UT campus.