- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 396
- Reaction score
- 0
Double major in Animal Science/Dairy Science! Woohoo!! 🙂
AS Legal Office Admin (it's really a BS degree)
AS Paralegal
Both served me well to gain good employment for the last 6 years, but now that I'm sick of working in law, I'm pursuing a BS in Animal Science.
MSc Microbiology and Immunology (almost done!)
Finally, another Immunologist. Is it me, or does this field suck!?
Amazing publication potential, but damn, its a friggin mess
OMG, i thought i was the ONLY one with a BA in Biology! My school did not offer the BA, but i refused to take Physics, so the Registrar told me they would have to give me a BA.
Sumstorm, how did you end up with a BA? Is this a normal option?
Note: i am taking Physics now....years and years after the fact. I knew it would catch up with me someday.![]()
Uh oh, why do you say that? I really love Immunology and if I don't get into vet school this time around, will be starting a Master's.
have fun, god willing, im out
quote]
Haha!! Thats exactly how I feel! Jeez a PhD really takes all the life outta ya. I think back to the days when I was doing undergrad 'research'. I am soooo glad I'm getting out of this mess.
P.S. But, don't let that put you down, i'm not kidding, you can basically prove ANYTHING you want with immunology - its in such a mess you can get **** past reviewers that you wouldn't normally dream of - So you will have a nice pub record.
Man I find that incredibly depressing. I genuinely find Immunology interesting (and can relate to some of your examples) but if there's that much apathy in the field, why bother? I'm not that interested in publications, just want the knowledge.
Well, i guess it depends on what kind of immunology you go into.
Well, I take that back, it doesn't matter at all. But im looking at the field as a whole - It may be more doable if you are able to concentrate on one aspect of it.
The only thing I can recommend, drop the $160.00 on Fundamental Immunology, 6th by W.E. Paul.
Screw Janeway and Kurby, they are just going to give you some dogma and you will be begging for more (if only to make it make a little bit more sense).
Im convinced Immuno is about to (~10-15 years) go through a nomenclature revolution (like enzymology) - I mean, we have NK cells that are virtually identical to T's, 3 types of DC's that we dont know what they do, cyto and chemokines that CAN'T do everything there supposed to be able to do (but were supposed to accept it), Some of the most complicated double +/- feedback mechanisms I've ever dealt with, membrane receptors that do something different depending on what gamma sub-unit is attracted the dimer (and you have no way of knowing unless you lysis), a nomenclature system that is archaic (take a look at TNF's or TLR's) - some are named after function, other structure; cross species, may or may not have same name/structure/function.
have fun, god willing, im out
P.S. But, don't let that put you down, i'm not kidding, you can basically prove ANYTHING you want with immunology - its in such a mess you can get **** past reviewers that you wouldn't normally dream of - So you will have a nice pub record.
well, One last bit of unsolicited advice if I may.
A) Make sure your PI knows what you want to do after grad school (You will need their support (no LoR from you PI is bad))
B) After you make you intentions known, never bring up vet school for the 2-3 years you are there. Do what you have to do, but forget about it. People don't want to hear it. Vent on forums if you must, what I do.
C) Concentrate on you work, your PI is the only one that needs to know that you are only doing graduate work for vet school.
There are a lot of ego's in academia. People will (maybe not so much as MS level) feel diminished knowing that you doing this just to advance your chances at a professional degree. Everyone does it, its cool, just can't be vocal about it.
If you are boarder line for admission, a graduate will probably push you over, but its not a silver bullet.
I'm throwing this out there, because it worked for me. I've also seen a few people have their dreams crushed by a-hole PI's who wont write a LoR for their students, or worse yet, write lackluster ones.
I understand what your saying....but how woud you feel if someone said 'I am going to vet school, but after that I am going to teach intro level biology?' Wouldn't that frustrate you? I would feel like they maybe shouldn't take the space if they aren't really interested in it.
Not saying that everyone doing this is using it simply as a stepping stone.... I hope many are planning on using thier research as part of thier future career, but it probably sounds like the former to many profs.
I would say this differs a lot depending on the program and the professors though.
But a DVM degree to teach intro level biology is way over kill whereas a Master's in Immunology could very much so help with your treatment of animals in the understanding of disease processes and the way drugs react to make them work (or not work in contraindications).
I know what your saying too. What if they didn't get into vet school or was still unsure they wanted vet school? Yes, you are right about using it as part of your future. You can use research as part as being a vet.
haha I still feel like its not their life to worry about what they do. Why would it effect them anyway if you didn't take a Phd where they are?
Ok, here's the issue in my mind as to why you should keep it to yourself.
The Ph.D and to a lesser extent MS program is a Master/Mentor position. You are being trained to be a researcher/teacher. The department is PAYING you to be get your degree and go into your select field (or one very close) to propagate the science. This is the direction 'they' took, and they feel this is the 'best' field. You can be open about it, but your colleague's will likely not appreciate your honesty.
Obviously it is a trust/respect issue between you and your PI, and that is why you should be open and forthcoming with him/her.
But, like Sumstorm said, getting a MS or PhD in a field and then going into vet school, is a waste of a degree and knowledge in their eyes. It is MUCH more an issue with Med. Students, who will be making 2-3x what you would make in academia, but the same holds true.
My Ph.D MIGHT open some doors in a few select residencies, but the one(s) I am interested in are not particularly comparative, so my degree is likely going to be wasted as a DVM.
Now, thats not really true for me, but I want Lab Animal/Industry, so for me, the degree may help, but i'm probably 1%.
This is just my opinion, but if you go the graduate route, your main concern needs to be fulfilling your graduate requirements, not increasing your chances at vet school.
Ohh, and don't even think about applying before your finish your degree. Thats a big 'no-no', most med schools have a policy of refusing applicants who are in the middle of a graduate degree, and im sure its not much different for vet schools.
Sure, but your getting a DVM, they want and expect you to do something for the field of veterinary medicine. The worst thing you can do on an interview is say "After I get my DVM I'd like to do _______________________ (Insert something that doesn't require a DVM to do). Its the same thing as a graduate degree. While having a MS or PhD might make you a better DVM, thats fine from the Vet schools perspective, but irrelevant from the graduate schools.
Do departments always pay for those advanced degrees though???
I thought they didn't unless certain circumstances. Like, for instance, some schools will pay for a Phd portion if you go dual degree in ver or human med..
Its also interesting to know that they wouldn't like to know you are leaving them, but what about if you plan on going into this reserach with real interest and going forth to apply it in your future??
Most do - Certainly for a PhD. MS is largely dependent if you are thesis based or not. Most large schools offer TA or RA's. If not, you can always tutor (which is a nice way for making extra cash, but that has to be on the D/L as well. Sometimes you are just not allowed to do it if you are on an assistantship, sometimes its frowned upon if you are a TA - DEF. not your own students!)
Those dual degree's are a little different then my experience, and you can ignore everything im saying in respect to dual DVM/PhD/MPH/MS degrees. They are a separate beast all together.
These aren't hard set rules, just my experience and opinion. I kept my desires to myself and a very small circle, and I think it worked to my advantage. If you feel strongly about being upfront with everyone, by all means, but its non of their business. What you do or don't do with your degree when you are done is your business, but you need your entire committee's blessing to get that degree.
If you think that the average committee member is above screwing you - over something petty, think again. It doesn't take much for one of them to say "I'd like to see you show that that protein is being up-regulated with an ELISA", gratz, you just got 3-4 months added before you can graduate.
Least ammo you give them the better - and I got hammered about my vet school ambitions on my prelim defense (some people spoke).
Yah I had no idea the 'Master's committee' people (those that run in that circle, that is) were so anti-EverythingElse. Wonder if it's like that everywhere.Ok, I just learned a new dimension of information. Thanks