- Joined
- Sep 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,372
- Reaction score
- 2,976
If it meant being inferior?
I actually had an interviewer ask me why I went to a small liberal arts school because he thought I seemed outgoing. The other interviewer was offended for me and told him he wasn't allowed to ask that. LOL
Why is a state school synonymous with a "bottom" school?
Cuz UVA, Umich and Berkeley are pleb-factories amiriteguys.
Good thing I applied to UCLA and UNC as back ups
I don't want to argue, so I'm not going to say anything you said is true or false. But did you realize you said that in a condescending way? As in, you implied that schools that are non-"greaaaat" unlike UChicago have classes that don't prepare you, or don't have good professors. Again, don't want to argue, but for the sake of future posts, you have to check if you are inadvertently insulting someone. Obviously it doesn't matter here on this anonymous forum, but you have to watch out about saying things like that in real life.I picked UChicago because of all the amazing opportunities, challenging classes that will actually prepare me, professors that are actually know their ****, because I got into greaaaaaaaat schools and unless you couldn't get in, why not?
What's so different between a state school's, say chemistry class, and an ivy league's chem class? Is it that they move at a faster pace? Cover more topics? Do harder problems? Thanks in advance! 🙂So I can get a 4.0 GPA with no studying at all and have 25 hours a day to study for the MCAT
LMFAO well here, the problems are harder. I did my friends' homework for them and their problems were multiple choice one-liners. Our questions were like paragraphs long.What's so different between a state school's, say chemistry class, and an ivy league's chem class? Is it that they move at a faster pace? Cover more topics? Do harder problems? Thanks in advance! 🙂
You do realize this thread was made to poke fun at my thread, right? But yes, I completely agree with my statement.I don't want to argue, so I'm not going to say anything you said is true or false. But did you realize you said that in a condescending way? As in, you implied that schools that are non-"greaaaat" unlike UChicago have classes that don't prepare you, or don't have good professors. Again, don't want to argue, but for the sake of future posts, you have to check if you are inadvertently insulting someone. Obviously it doesn't matter here on this anonymous forum, but you have to watch out about saying things like that in real life.
PS: If you are purposely being silly like everyone else here, disregard this.
What's so different between a state school's, say chemistry class, and an ivy league's chem class? Is it that they move at a faster pace? Cover more topics? Do harder problems? Thanks in advance! 🙂
LMFAO well here, the problems are harder. I did my friends' homework for them and their problems were multiple choice one-liners. Our questions were like paragraphs long.
Think about it. Ivies (whether they inflate or deflate) NEED to make exams hard and in the case of UChicago, also to ensure a wide range of grades. If we took some exams from state schools, we'd all get 100s (or almost all) and then what? How would UChicago give out grades? All A's, PSH.
Well at least when you're compared to the students, you're probably very smart so it doesn't matter. 😀I wish my "crappy" state school's gen chem exams were multiple choice.
LMFAO well here, the problems are harder. I did my friends' homework for them and their problems were multiple choice one-liners. Our questions were like paragraphs long.
Think about it. Ivies (whether they inflate or deflate) NEED to make exams hard and in the case of UChicago, also to ensure a wide range of grades. If we took some exams from state schools, we'd all get 100s (or almost all) and then what? How would UChicago give out grades? All A's, PSH.
NO PLEASE STOP. DON'T LET THE FLAME WAR BEGIN.I wish my "crappy" state school's gen chem exams were multiple choice.
Sure, but I think all schools can't be compared for various reasons:Perhaps if it was a low ranked state school. Try taking some of the exams at the UC's.
I saw a Orgo exam where half the questions are definitions to things like Zaitsev's rule and the questions are very basic mechanisms. Purely a memorization test.What's so different between a state school's, say chemistry class, and an ivy league's chem class? Is it that they move at a faster pace? Cover more topics? Do harder problems? Thanks in advance! 🙂
Sure, but I think all schools can't be compared for various reasons:
1. Curving on percentages (10 percent A's, 20 percent B's, etc) just depends on the quality of students. The smartest in one place might be the dumbest in another.
2. Exam difficulty.
3. Other none-exam factors. Some places homework, "participation", etc is factored into grades. With curves, if you DON'T do it, you're hurting yourself. If you do it, you're still only compared on exams (unless homework is strictly graded).
4. Grading scales strictly on points. This means if 90%+ averages get As (and etc) you won't be weeded out because you're not compared to others AND probably means exams aren't that hard considering some classes our exam average (B-) is a 50%.
My friend's neurology exam was identifying parts of the brain and other stupid ****. Easy 100% while taking her 4 other Bio/Orgo classes + working full time. So hard for a 100 ranked school.
You'll see how much they love you when you start getting calls for donations as an "alumnus" before you even graduate...straight rollin in dough. they love me. they really love me. terms and exclusions apply
You'll see how much they love you when you start getting calls for donations as an "alumnus" before you even graduate...
State schools in the South are God's gift to menThat's where all the blondies are.
I didn't either until that moment...I didn't even know that stereotype existed...
I'm just curious how you feel about those people who were smart enough to go wherever but said "screw all that hard stuff, they'll teach me what I need to know to be a doctor in med school." The people from unranked universities with MCATs in the 35+ range that hardly studied for it and got damn near straight As while sleepwalking through class. The kids that are smart and didn't have to work as hard as you because they knew it was unnecessary.Sure, but I think all schools can't be compared for various reasons:
1. Curving on percentages (10 percent A's, 20 percent B's, etc) just depends on the quality of students. The smartest in one place might be the dumbest in another.
2. Exam difficulty.
3. Other none-exam factors. Some places homework, "participation", etc is factored into grades. With curves, if you DON'T do it, you're hurting yourself. If you do it, you're still only compared on exams (unless homework is strictly graded).
4. Grading scales strictly on points. This means if 90%+ averages get As (and etc) you won't be weeded out because you're not compared to others AND probably means exams aren't that hard considering some classes our exam average (B-) is a 50%.
My friend's neurology exam was identifying parts of the brain and other stupid ****. Easy 100% while taking her 4 other Bio/Orgo classes + working full time. So hard for a 100 ranked school.
I picked UChicago because of all the amazing opportunities, challenging classes that will actually prepare me, professors that are actually know their ****, because I got into greaaaaaaaat schools and unless you couldn't get in, why not?
🙄If it meant being inferior?