Hello everyone,
I have been writing my secondary applications about a week now. As I fill out the boxes for both allopathic and osteopathic schools, I reflected on what I have learned about the distinction between the two. I have learned a lot about what distinguishes the osteopathic approach: treating the body in a holistic manner, finding alternative ways of treatment to help the body heal itself instead of immediately turning to medicine, focusing on health promotion and disease prevention in a patient's lifestyle, etc. But, what makes the allopathic route unique? Other than the schools are generally more prestigious and the average MD salary is higher than the average DO salary, in terms of the philosophy of the approach, why would a potential medical school student choose MD or DO?
I have been writing my secondary applications about a week now. As I fill out the boxes for both allopathic and osteopathic schools, I reflected on what I have learned about the distinction between the two. I have learned a lot about what distinguishes the osteopathic approach: treating the body in a holistic manner, finding alternative ways of treatment to help the body heal itself instead of immediately turning to medicine, focusing on health promotion and disease prevention in a patient's lifestyle, etc. But, what makes the allopathic route unique? Other than the schools are generally more prestigious and the average MD salary is higher than the average DO salary, in terms of the philosophy of the approach, why would a potential medical school student choose MD or DO?