Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Most of my GOP friends don't like TRUMP. We recognize him for the narcissistic person he is. Trump cares most about Trump. But, we inside the GOP must look at policy as well. The choice between Warren and Trump is clear to anyone who leans even a little bit right of center. Heck, I'm not even sure the independents who lean a touch left will vote for Warren.
Trump is a populist. He will say whatever he needs to say to get elected. The most important thing he has done for me is to keep the SCOTUS conservative. That alone is enough to secure my vote.
I recognize my biases particularly my desire to maintain the US Constitution as it exists now not how some liberal judges think it ought to be.
I want clean water and air. I respect the environment and think we should do things to keep it clean and safe. I lean left of Trump on these issues but still far right of Warren/Sanders New Green Deal. Most likely, I fall in the middle where most people are on this issue. Reasonable policy changes that won't bankrupt our nation.
Where is Howard Schultz when the Democrats need him the most? By far, the most reasonable and smartest of the Dems I heard at those Town Hall discussions.
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz says he will not run for president in 2020
Earlier this year, he said that he was "seriously thinking" of running for president "as a centrist independent," prompting worries among Democrats that he could split the vote and help President Donald Trump win.www.cnbc.com
Love your posts Blade, but the bolded is pure BOOMER drivel. Us millennials are already saddled with extreme school debt. Now that we are about to start earning our fair share you want us to pay for MORE wars, student loans, Medicare, and illegals? Will millennials ever get a break, or will boomers demand it all?
Yeah. The variously attributed saying "the market can remain irrational a lot longer than you can remain solvent" comes to mind. On one level I'm watching people bet against Trump with the same morbid fascination I have for people who short the stock market.
Warren will be the nominee and she will pose a serious threat to Trump. She’s a more attractive Hillary Clinton. I know she’s a “swamp monster” with her Harvard law school connections, so I’m sure she will have her Wall Street backers backs when the time comes. They all do at these high levels.
Because there are certain things that should never be for sale, because they are priceless, such as the American democracy and values, the country, the Law. The damage that's being done to the country by Trump and his mob of cronies may take a long time to be repaired.
thehill.com
GND= Green New Deal
"Another emerging theme from the survey is that people do not want to spend their own money to combat climate change. Thirty-seven percent do not want to pay any additional taxes, and only 14 percent are willing to pay even $1 more a month.
Since the GND promotes a 100 percent switch to renewables, we also asked whether people would be willing to pay more in various costs to support such a switch. A resounding 70 percent of respondents said they are unwilling to pay more in electric bills, 66 percent are unwilling to pay more in taxes, and 67 percent are unwilling to pay more in food costs to see a shift to 100 percent renewable energy.
In short: People are concerned about climate change but have other more pressing issues on their mind as the election heats up. When climate change is the focus, they do not want to pay more, nor do they trust politicians to tackle the issue."
Voters want to tackle climate change — but not at expense of kitchen table issues
People are concerned about climate change but have other more pressing issues on their mind as the election heats up.
Tell them a little louder how stupid they are. Maybe not all of them heard Hillary say it in 2016. 🙂
GND= Green New Deal
"Another emerging theme from the survey is that people do not want to spend their own money to combat climate change. Thirty-seven percent do not want to pay any additional taxes, and only 14 percent are willing to pay even $1 more a month.
Since the GND promotes a 100 percent switch to renewables, we also asked whether people would be willing to pay more in various costs to support such a switch. A resounding 70 percent of respondents said they are unwilling to pay more in electric bills, 66 percent are unwilling to pay more in taxes, and 67 percent are unwilling to pay more in food costs to see a shift to 100 percent renewable energy.
In short: People are concerned about climate change but have other more pressing issues on their mind as the election heats up. When climate change is the focus, they do not want to pay more, nor do they trust politicians to tackle the issue."
Voters want to tackle climate change — but not at expense of kitchen table issues
People are concerned about climate change but have other more pressing issues on their mind as the election heats up.
Oh, please! This guy was schooled by Ray Cohn, and made him proud (even Ray Cohn is said to have called him "cold"). He's anything but a novice and an idiot. The idiots are the ones looking for excuses.
Sure, in third-world dictatorships. It was like Godfather IV, especially the part where it mentioned Giuliani. What's the president's personal lawyer, who doesn't exist as a member of US government, doing in a diplomatic discussion? Why is he even involved, unless we are playing Godfather? And, if this discussion was so innocent, why was the White House so desperate to hide it?
Keep rationalizing. Also remember the road to hell... If you don't like Warren, don't vote for her; I may not vote either. But there is really no excuse for voting for Trump except SELFISHNESS.
Sure it's illegal. Is this the first time you hear that you cannot consort with a foreign power for electoral purposes? It's American law. That's what the whole Mueller investigation was about.
Really? The president of the United States withholds $400MM from every country that doesn't investigate Americans based just on hearsay? Can you please show me a precedent, especially one involving prosecuting Republicans?
