- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 440
- Reaction score
- 534
4 waitlists, 0 acceptances, potentially one more waitlist placement in the making.
:/ Still have faith something will work out
:/ Still have faith something will work out
Last edited:
Their acceptances cannot be seen until a decision is rendered.
The report only shows the current situation.I assume that the acceptances database/report is updated in real time to reflect new offers received or withdrawals. Can schools see previous acceptances that an applicant withdrew from, or does the report only show current active offers?
The report only shows the current situation.
We do record old reports at intervals, though.
You have a bright future in academic medicine!I find the practice of recording old reports at intervals very interesting. Does the situation ever arise where you look at an applicant you're about to accept off the waitlist, but then see that they've recently withdrawn from Top10A and Top20B while holding onto UofRandomC and think to yourself well, this kid probably has his reasons about where he wants to go...maybe we shouldn't bother?
You have a bright future in academic medicine!
Just found this thread. It's a little depressing, but interesting to see that so many people are in similar positions.
Applied to 16 MD schools, 8 II's, 7 WL's, 1 Rejection.
37 MCAT, 3.8 GPA, research publication and grants, varied and numerous clinical experiences, lots of volunteering and extracurriculars - teaching, tutoring, etc. I may be a cookie cutter applicant... but I didn't realize it would be this hard to gain an acceptance.
I spoke with some adcoms after interviewing and have overall gotten very positive feedback on my interview skills. At the end of the day, it seems medical schools can only offer so many acceptances, and they're just comparing applications to find the most competitive applicants. You can be a holistic applicant with great stats, but this whole process is clearly subjective. Very frustrated and hoping for waitlist movement for everyone.
Yeah, I have similar stats to you. 39 MCAT, 3.8 GPA. Got 5 interviews and got waitlisted at 3 and rejected at 1. Still have one to hear back from. I also had similar ECs to you except I didn't get a publication. I also did not realize that acceptance would be so challenging.
Just found this thread. It's a little depressing, but interesting to see that so many people are in similar positions.
Applied to 16 MD schools, 8 II's, 7 WL's, 1 Rejection.
37 MCAT, 3.8 GPA, research publication and grants, varied and numerous clinical experiences, lots of volunteering and extracurriculars - teaching, tutoring, etc. I may be a cookie cutter applicant... but I didn't realize it would be this hard to gain an acceptance.
I spoke with some adcoms after interviewing and have overall gotten very positive feedback on my interview skills. At the end of the day, it seems medical schools can only offer so many acceptances, and they're just comparing applications to find the most competitive applicants. You can be a holistic applicant with great stats, but this whole process is clearly subjective. Very frustrated and hoping for waitlist movement for everyone.
Yeah, I have similar stats to you. 39 MCAT, 3.8 GPA. Got 5 interviews and got waitlisted at 3 and rejected at 1. Still have one to hear back from. I also had similar ECs to you except I didn't get a publication. I also did not realize that acceptance would be so challenging.
Yeah, I have similar stats to you. 39 MCAT, 3.8 GPA. Got 5 interviews and got waitlisted at 3 and rejected at 1. Still have one to hear back from. I also had similar ECs to you except I didn't get a publication. I also did not realize that acceptance would be so challenging.
Add me to this list... 3.8 / 38 / publication, tons of shadowing, clinical volunteering, research, leadership, 6 solid LORs
7 MD interviews
4 waitlists
2 rejections
1 pending (most likely waitlist as well)
Sorry to hear you guys are going through this, but at the same time there is some comfort in knowing I'm not alone.
I feel ya man....April 30 is right around the corner. I'm pretty scared haha 5 MD waitlists for me, no acceptances yetofficially on 7 (!!) waitlists with no acceptances. going to be a long crappy wait until WL movement starts
I feel ya man....April 30 is right around the corner. I'm pretty scared haha 5 MD waitlists for me, no acceptances yet
Can anyone clarify... People say April 30, some say May 15. In the past I know it has been May 15, but what is it this year?
Add me to this list... 3.8 / 38 / publication, tons of shadowing, clinical volunteering, research, leadership, 6 solid LORs
7 MD interviews
4 waitlists
2 rejections
1 pending (most likely waitlist as well)
Sorry to hear you guys are going through this, but at the same time there is some comfort in knowing I'm not alone.
Holy ****...I can't believe you haven't gotten an acceptance with those stats.
Thanks!!In the past, MD/PhD was April 30 while MD-only was May 15.
However, decision day (day to hold one acceptance) is definitely April 30 for all candidates. Check out aamc traffic rules...you should have received an email from them about it!
While I sincerely hope Temerit gets into a school (he deserves it that's for sure) if you look at his MDApps he applied very top-heavy. I completely understand why: his stats are great and he has strong ECs. That being said I saw an MDApps where someone with similar stats was accepted to just 1 school: an unranked SUNY (as an OOS).
I see. So the answer is that the case where a school hasn't officially waitlisted someone after May 15th is vanishingly rare, and pointless on their part to boot.
I do remember seeing an applicant who got a waitlist notification from Stanford in June last year, but that must be the product of an admissions office under a lot of stress and making unusual decisions.
Thanks for explaining all of this, I hope I haven't derailed the thread for those who need the support.
Much later edit: Now I understand why it would be more strategic to waitlist everyone rather than keep them in limbo. It allows the school to access the student's other acceptances sooner, as long as it's after April 1st. So schools that are letting people stay in no-decision limbo are truly just inefficient because they would have something to gain from making a decision.
Just found this thread. It's a little depressing, but interesting to see that so many people are in similar positions.
Applied to 16 MD schools, 8 II's, 7 WL's, 1 Rejection.
37 MCAT, 3.8 GPA, research publication and grants, varied and numerous clinical experiences, lots of volunteering and extracurriculars - teaching, tutoring, etc. I may be a cookie cutter applicant... but I didn't realize it would be this hard to gain an acceptance.
I spoke with some adcoms after interviewing and have overall gotten very positive feedback on my interview skills. At the end of the day, it seems medical schools can only offer so many acceptances, and they're just comparing applications to find the most competitive applicants. You can be a holistic applicant with great stats, but this whole process is clearly subjective. Very frustrated and hoping for waitlist movement for everyone.
Yeah, I have similar stats to you. 39 MCAT, 3.8 GPA. Got 5 interviews and got waitlisted at 3 and rejected at 1. Still have one to hear back from. I also had similar ECs to you except I didn't get a publication. I also did not realize that acceptance would be so challenging.
Add me to this list... 3.8 / 38 / publication, tons of shadowing, clinical volunteering, research, leadership, 6 solid LORs
7 MD interviews
4 waitlists
2 rejections
1 pending (most likely waitlist as well)
Sorry to hear you guys are going through this, but at the same time there is some comfort in knowing I'm not alone.
Looks like I'm not alone in anxiously waiting for the end of April.
37 MCAT/3.8 GPA
non-trad
7 II
6 WL
1 pending
I don't know any school that does this.There's a good chance you were waitlisted because they thought you might have acceptances elsewhere.
I don't know any school that does this.
Every school I know could fill up their interview slots with extremely high-scoring applicants. We can only interview the ones we like the best that are more likely to attend. This "yield protection" is actually just resource management and it occurs before the interview. It makes no sense to waitlist the best interviewees when an early acceptance is our strongest recruitment tool.
I don't know any school that does this.
Every school I know could fill up their interview slots with extremely high-scoring applicants. We can only interview the ones we like the best that are more likely to attend. This "yield protection" is actually just resource management and it occurs before the interview. It makes no sense to waitlist the best interviewees when an early acceptance is our strongest recruitment tool.
1. I know of no source of reliable data to answer this question. In my experience, the first big wave of adjustment usually happens in the first month after traffic day.I couple questions for you @gyngyn if you don't mind.
1. What (approx) percent of total waitlist movement occurs in the first month following decision day?
2. Why is it that waitlist movement sometimes extends into July? Is this just the product of people withdrawing from schools for personal reasons at the last minute and the school scrambling to fill the spot?
3. Do you expect this year to have especially high waitlist movement given the trend of people applying to more schools?
Thanks
There is no rule that requires a decision by any date (expect for a sufficient # to fill the class by 3/15).
We cannot see anything about your acceptances until we render a decision, though.
We can see where waitlisted candidates are holding an acceptance after April Fool's day.
(You sure type fast).
I am starting to get the sense that an applicant who has no decision on their application by late April is in a functional state equivalent to a waitlist. They have heard no definitive news; their other acceptances can be seen; and they have no timetable for when they might hear. I think this helps me understand--hopefully those in this thread will find it helpful too. If not the most pleasant state of being. (Edited to add: I wasn't quite right, see below.)
You can make a primary offer, but you cannot draw from the waitlist without calling the school being poached!
There is really no good reason not to put everyone on the waitlist after May 15th.
I see. So the answer is that the case where a school hasn't officially waitlisted someone after May 15th is vanishingly rare, and pointless on their part to boot.
I do remember seeing an applicant who got a waitlist notification from Stanford in June last year, but that must be the product of an admissions office under a lot of stress and making unusual decisions.
Thanks for explaining all of this, I hope I haven't derailed the thread for those who need the support.
Much later edit: Now I understand why it would be more strategic to waitlist everyone rather than keep them in limbo. It allows the school to access the student's other acceptances sooner, as long as it's after April 1st. So schools that are letting people stay in no-decision limbo are truly just inefficient because they would have something to gain from making a decision.
1. I know of no source of reliable data to answer this question. In my experience, the first big wave of adjustment usually happens in the first month after traffic day.
2. The "most desirable" schools begin the process by poaching applicants from schools that will then poach students from the schools below them. This repeats more slowly until school starts. Part of the strategy of an early start date is to keep a school's best students from such thievery. Withdrawal for other reasons is uncommon.
3. Waitlist movement varies dramatically from school to school and from year to year. I cannot hazard a general guess regarding this year's outcomes.
I don't know any school that does this.
Every school I know could fill up their interview slots with extremely high-scoring applicants. We can only interview the ones we like the best that are more likely to attend. This "yield protection" is actually just resource management and it occurs before the interview. It makes no sense to waitlist the best interviewees when an early acceptance is our strongest recruitment tool.
You are correct. I am only referring to schools at liberty to interview anyone without a statutory obligation. (e.g. not TX!).I'm sure there are exceptions to this though. Like some state schools have a rule to interview basically all in-state applicants that are above a certain stat threshold. So I would guess that those schools exercise "yield protection" after interviews (at lease for IS applicants). Also, is yield protection solely done for resource management.? I thought it helped their rankings (schools care about their ranking even more than premeds do).
I can't imagine what benefit there would be in not notifying the student of a committee decision but the school cannot see the alternate waitlist acceptances until a decision has been submitted to AMCAS.So schools don't have to make a final decision?
Can a school see this if they send status to AMCAS but never notify the student?
Right, but their other acceptances can't be seen since the school hasn't officially waitlisted them, no? Or is this possible without notifying the student? (i.e. what I just asked above)
Would that be may 1st for this cycle? Wasn't may 15th the date for 'must hold only one acceptance' day?
I'm curious if this may 15th date being thrown around is may 1st this year since everything moved up, or so I thought.
I agree that they're being inefficient, but I think traffic rules should dictate that students should be notified of final post interview decision by the end of April.
You are correct. I am only referring to schools at liberty to interview anyone without a statutory obligation. (e.g. not TX!).
While selectivity does have a small effect on perception, in practice all schools with which I am well acquainted are far more interested in using their resources to get the best class they can possibly seat. Ultimately, selectivity is a very small variable in rankings.
I can't imagine what benefit there would be in not notifying the student of a committee decision but the school cannot see the alternate waitlist acceptances until a decision has been submitted to AMCAS.
Required poaching notification begins in June.
As I have never been a participant in a state mandated requirement regarding interviews or IS percentage I cannot tell you exactly how they manage this. They probably interview a relatively small proportion of OOS candidates and assure statutory mandates by adjusting the percentage on waitlisted candidates. In other words, if a public school in TX were to have fewer than 90% IS by the time they reached the waitlist they would draw only from IS candidates until the goal was reached.Would you please elaborate on this? How does a schools waitlist "strategy" change when they are mandated to interview certain IS students?
Yes.So schools don't notify each other about 'poaching' in May even though students might be withdrawing during May? Or is the poaching notification something that has to be sent to the school along with the notification the student gets.
I.e. in may only student is notified about acceptance off waitlist and student withdraws from other school if they're already accepted, whereas in june the poacher school has to notify both the student and the institution where said student is holding an acceptance.
It's a traffic violation if we don't.Why do the schools need to notify the other schools of "poaching"?
As I have never been a participant in a state mandated requirement regarding interviews or IS percentage I cannot tell you exactly how they manage this. They probably interview a relatively small proportion of OOS candidates and assure statutory mandates by adjusting the percentage on waitlisted candidates. In other words, if a public school in TX were to have fewer than 90% IS by the time they reached the waitlist they would draw only from IS candidates until the goal was reached.
It's a traffic violation if we don't.
No. Resource management happens before the interview. If you wanted someone enough to interview them and are a highly desirable candidate, it makes no sense to waitlist them.Would a school in that situation be more inclined to waitlist a higher stat applicant due to the inability to pre-screen and give themselves some sort of "yield protection"?
No. Resource management happens before the interview. If you wanted someone enough to interview them and are a highly desirable candidate, it makes no sense to waitlist them.
Yes.So it's perfectly fine to accept a student off a waitlist as long as you notify the school they are holding their acceptance with beforehand?
Is it just a formality or is anything done by either party in this situation post-notification?
Yes! I'm glad I've never had to deal with this.Aren't you limited in pre-interview resource management when you are mandated to interview students above a certain stat threshold?