I have a LOR from the PI of a lab I worked in as an undergrad, I received about 10 units of "pass/no pass" credit and on my aacomas verified app the courses appear under the "bio/zoology" category, yet I just received an email from DMU stating that this LOR doesn't fulfill any of their requirements since they classified it as a "research" letter. Would I be able to convince anyone that this was technically an LOR from a proff for whom I took a class with? At the moment I only have 1 letter from a science faculty* and the prospects of me getting a new LOR doesn't look good since I graduated more than 2 years ago and it's summer. Has anyone else who's been accepted to med school been able to use a letter like this as a letter from a science proff?
*My other LOR from a proff is from a professor of anthropology, and I noticed at least for DMU, that they ask for letters from "biology, chemsitry, and physics" courses. Do most schools only count the above 3 subjects as being science? The courses I took with this proff were physical anthroplogy courses: human evolutionary biology, and primate evolution... which I assumed would be considered "science" since the courses involved knowledge about anatomy and dealt with evolution, which pretty much seems like it would fit under the umbrella of "biology".