Adelphi

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

phdhopefull

New Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to see if there were any Adelphi students out there with an opinion on the school. I am waiting on a decision into their Ph.D program for Clinical Psychology. From what I know it doesn't have the best ranking, but it has very good clinical training.
 
i know that they already invited people for an open house. other than that, your impression seems adequate. the students there are very pleased with the program, and if you're interested in a psychanalytic perspective then its the right place for you.

gl

I just wanted to see if there were any Adelphi students out there with an opinion on the school. I am waiting on a decision into their Ph.D program for Clinical Psychology. From what I know it doesn't have the best ranking, but it has very good clinical training.
 
i know that they already invited people for an open house. other than that, your impression seems adequate. the students there are very pleased with the program, and if you're interested in a psychanalytic perspective then its the right place for you.

gl

Since SDN's Interview Feedback section doesn't include Adelphi's Ph.D. program, I think it's worth mentioning here--since I believe it reflects on the program--that Adelphi had by leaps and bounds the most time-wasting and condescending group interview I experienced at any school. (This is not sour grapes, by the way: I got invited to the Open House, plus I think very highly of what I've learned about the program itself otherwise.)

So what happened? They had 6 or 7 of us sit in a room together with one faculty member and one student, both of whom intentionally said next to nothing... for two hours. Just endless. It was like some sort of weird caricature of an analytic session (not necessarily coincidental, since the program itself is highly psychodynamic). But it was just incredibly awkward, with dozens of long silences. More to the point, it was far less revealing of who we really were than any other individual or group interview I've had. Their stated goal at the outset was for us not to talk about our credentials, but rather to give a sense of who we "really" are personally, etc. Unfortunately, this was far outweighed by their other, eventually-admitted goal: to see how we do socially in awkward or unexpected situations. No one was remotely natural. (Ironcially, during the one 10-minute break we got in the middle, the applicants stood around talking totally normally out of earshot of the faculty member.)

I understand that "stress" interviews of this and other types are not unheard-of, and I agree that there is often something valuable to be learned about people's reactions in uncomfortable situations. But for two hours?? Fortunately, I only had to take half a day off from work and drive out from NYC, but I cannot imagine how frustrating the experience must have felt for people who had to truly travel to get there. Again, I "did" well, but only by keeping in check my rising frustration about how condescending I found the experience. Are we not all adults here? 😉

We were later told that different faculty members run these group interviews differently, so maybe my group just got unlucky, but the fact that the school chose to use its one in-person chance with applicants to present itself that way (and only that way) went a long way towards turning me off from the program.

Just my two cents.
MW
 
Yea, I went through the interview, and it was very stressful. What I am hoping is that someone can speak to the quality of the program itself. Also worth noting is that everyone who was invited for an interview was invited back for the open house.
 
I actually really enjoyed my group interview, which was done in the same format as MW described. I thought it was actually a much better way of getting to know a person, the ways in which we interact with other people, our ability to handle a stressful environment and ability to discuss that stress openly in a group. Definitely important in this field. Many schools which look to match students to professors don't even really care about their abilities to be clinicians, mostly because their hope is to train students to be researchers. I have also had some one-on-one interviews looking to assess clinical abilities but somehow this felt like a better way of doing it. I didn't find it to be a waist of time at all, really to be like some sort of interesting psychological experiment. I will definitely remember this interview for the rest of my life! I think 2 hours gave the professor and graduate student a solid amount of time to really get to know the people in the group. The program is very psychodynamic/psychoanalytic and they are known to train people to be kick-ass clinicians. If you're looking to do serious research, maybe it's not the best place for you. Also, they definitely did not invite everyone back to the open house, but yes, maybe half. Now they somehow have to cut down the group in half again to decide who will be accepted and who'll be on the waitlist. Good luck to you all who were there last night!
 
I have mixed feelings about Adelphi's interview process. I went in expecting it to be run in an open-ended psychoanalytic format as was mentioned in this forum, however, our interview was more like a group discussion about the therapy process. Perhaps, that was not the goal, but our facilitators introjected fairly often and kept the discussion running fluently in this direction. It was not overly stressful, but then again, I was not invited back for the open house, so perhaps I missed the point of the interview. Regardless, I would just love to know how we were evaluated at this "interview".

Supposedly, (from what current students informed us), about 200 people applied, 150 were interviewed ( quite a large number), and 75 were invited to the open house, 36 of which are accepted and the rest are on a waitlist. However, (again according to current students that we met with), the people invited to the open house are not told whether or not they are accepted or waitlisted until after the open house and whether or not one attends the open house apparently has no bearing on their acceptance which has already been determined. Again, according to the students we met with, the point is so that the faculty can sell the program to all accepted and wait listed students. If you ask me, I think this is a bit of a tease for those wait-listed (and again my info is hearsay so I apologize if it was done differently this year).

So my overall feelings are this. Sure the process may be great for those accepted. But as an individual not accepted into the program, I find myself wondering why and having no substantial answer to this question.

I'm not sold on the process, but it's all relative.
 
To be filed under "anecdotal," but a former supervisor of mine is a very happy alumna of Adelphi. She did share with me, however, that had she been accepted at CUNY, it would have been her first choice (and not just for the cheaper tuition).
 
I went to the open house, and after a somewhat skeptical view of the program after the group interview, I felt it redeemed itself quite well. As has been said before, the clinical training is great and if that's what you're looking for, it will definitely prepare you. Also, although many professors don't really do research, the few that do have very busy labs and their students can and do publish often. I met one fourth year student last night who was working on her dissertation, but had already had 5+ publications (both first and second author) in major journals.

As for the group interview, I didn't feel it was particularly stressful, although I was definitely confused as to what they thought they were learning about us in that situation. However, our conversation flowed pretty naturally, everyone was really nice and tried to include everyone else in the discussion, and I almost felt like I wanted everyone to go out to lunch after to continue the discussion. However, I do think it made me think twice about the program since they didn't seem to care about selling themselves to the applicants at all. The open house did a fair job of that, but again it's hard since I'm sure many people couldn't make it, or were turned off to the program by that time.

The program seems like a really good option, especially for the clincally-oriented student, and I would probably go if I hadn't gotten into my first choice (fully-funded) program.

Good luck:luck:
 
adelphi will give final decisions on Monday March 26th via email. 30 will get accepted, the rest will be waitlisted - that's what i heard today😎
 
I went to the interview, but I am not sure if I was invited to the open house. If I got an open house invite, would it have been via snail mail? email? If so, I might have disregarded it as junk mail. I definetely didn't get called. Are you positive it doesn't impact whether you got in?
 
I went to the interview, but I am not sure if I was invited to the open house. If I got an open house invite, would it have been via snail mail? email? If so, I might have disregarded it as junk mail. I definetely didn't get called. Are you positive it doesn't impact whether you got in?

Hey Ohno1235, you would have received an email from Pat Ross about the open house. Whether or not you went apparently does not affect your acceptance.

Lakan, how did you find out that we'll hear from Adelphi on the 26th?
 
A friend of mine talked to Pat Ross and he said that he'll send out emails on the 26th both to the ones accepted and to the waiting list
 
A friend of mine talked to Pat Ross and he said that he'll send out emails on the 26th both to the ones accepted and to the waiting list

Oh, great. Thanks for letting us know!
 
Hey all -

A friend of mine called Dr.Ross and he said that if you didn't get an invite then you are rejected. He also looked up his file and said that "the group leader had not recommended him for admission."
So if you haven't heard from them since your interview, you can call him and he'll tell you straight if its a NO.
 
Anyone heard from them yet? It's pretty late in the day and they said they would be getting back to everyone by the 26th.
 
I got in and I will definitely be accepting the offer! I'm thrilled. Anyone else hear back yet?
 
Congrats Sol. When did you receive the email (Relative to Eastern Time)? Im dying at work right now waiting to know if I got in.
 
I got an email at about 4:30. It was an individual email so it's probably taking a while for Pat to write them all...hang in there!
 
Thanks, and once again, congrats
 
i received an email saying that i'm on the alternate list. i don't have high hopes since they anyway were supposed to take more than the expected incoming year.
wasn't really thinking of the option that i would not have options. it sucks!
 
Top