I had a meeting with Dr. Bera and company yesterday as part of a focus group to improve student life (not that student life is lacking, but just to get some ideas on what is working, what's not, etc.). I wasn't aware they are adding 12 more spots from last year, you guys might have found that out at your interview. Anyways, that's good news for you all. There is definitely plenty of room here at the new building, so no worries about it being overcrowded.
I mentioned that I had a really tough time with the admissions process, how long it took to find out, etc. and that I knew many people who were applying this year were experiencing the same. I also mentioned the lack of quality in the admissions website, which they said they are working on. All it takes, I told them, is a simple page letting students know what their status is. I'm sure the main problem is that most students' status is yet to be determined so I am not sure if that would help any. However, next year the website will be pretty slick; from what I understand, they're working on it.
At any rate.. last year the process was slow as well. By April they had offered spots to 110 applicants and had 90 something spots. Basically, those interviewing in April were interviewing for a waitlist spot. However, just because you interviewed in November doesn't necessarily mean that you will be notified before anyone else. They want to compare the Nov. applicants with the March applicants, and so on and so forth..
In May-June, the waitlist was formed, and began to move quickly as students began to withdraw from Davis to attend other schools. Many people get in off the waitlist so don't be dismayed.
Many people have asked about the curriculum and such, what I've thought about it as an MS1 - I'll share my thoughts for you right here and right now..
CURRICULUM:
As you may know, Davis has taken a more integrative approach to learning this stuff called medicine. Block I consisted of Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Genetics, Cell and Tissue Biology and Doctoring (is that it?). These classes were pretty rigorous, and it definitely takes a lot of work. The way the courses are structured is that for example, when you begin studying the heart in physiology is when you study the heart in anatomy. This can be challenging, however, in that not everything is integrated (it would be impossible). Other courses have additional material (such as cardiac, skeletal and smooth muscle properties in Cell and Tissue). So while there is an attempt to integrate everything, there ends up being extra stuff to study. It helps though to have the integration that IS there. It also helps that it is spread over a longer amount of time, but hurts when you go to take a final on stuff that you learned 5 months ago! Pros and cons, they're everywhere..
The MS1s really got bogged down with quizzes every Monday last block. It felt like a marathon, and for that, we have requested that quizzes be every 2-3 weeks. Yes, you can thank us. It's nice to have a weekend here and there to go out of town, do fun things, etc. We just couldn't do that with the quizzes.
The LCME requested that UCD have additional student-directed learning, fewer lecture based material, and more independent learning. This is why Davis has integrated ISDLs (interactive student directed learning), ICBLs (interactive case base learning) and AMP (application of medical principles). What's nice about this, is that the cases are integrated with whatever material we are learning that week. What's not so nice, is that the classes are mandatory (you have to sign in), but these only count for 10% of your grade. If you are the type to do things on your own, are doing well in the class, you don't need to come. I have been getting a lot out of these - physicians/clinicians from the hospital teach these, and I am able to see a clinical perspective on the subject, rather than a PhD's perspective. Clinical is what will matter eventually. I think the most resisted part of the new curriculum change thus far has been the WEEKLY quizzes (which have now been changed to bi-weekly), and ISDLs. ISDLs are micro and immunology cases that are presented by students to students, and at first, they were going wayyy to long and detailed, and required attendance. The instructors do draw from this material to put on the quiz, which was overwhelming at times. They are also testing out something called IRAT and GRAT in a Team Based Learning (TBL) concept. I know, I get sick of all the acronyms too. You can look this stuff up online, but it's been shown to improve learning. Basically you study material ahead of time, take a test, turn it in, then take the same test in a small group, and turn that in. Your grade is the average of the two tests. This stimulates conversation about the material, and obviously is mandatory. You'll find that in any medical school, mandatory lectures are resisted (there's always something else you need to be doing!). All in all, it's not too bad. Only 10% of your grade - enough to want to do well on, but not enough to stress you out if you do poorly on a test here and there.
Mostly all instructors bend over backwards for the students, stay late after labs and classes, and are very fast to respond to questions by emails. I was particularly impressed with our Cell and Tissue biology course, it is second to none. Anatomy was impressive as well, it just moves pretty fast.
I love Davis, I couldn't imagine going anywhere else. The people are great, the teachers are great, the curriculum is working for me. I'd recommend this school to anyone that wants a non-competitive atmosphere, great clinical experiences, and ample study space in a brand new building.
Well I hope this has helped you guys out a bit - maybe it will convince you to come here, maybe it will convince you to go elsewhere. The point is, go where you will be happy. You'll find you will be a lot less stressed out and it will be easier to study and learn if you're happy. Feel free to respond on here if you have any further questions about anything at all.
Good luck, and do well out there!!
G
MS1 at UCD