- Joined
- Oct 4, 2002
- Messages
- 798
- Reaction score
- 600
Are most of you also applying to MD programs? If you get into both DO and MD, which one would you chose?
Originally posted by s42brown
absolute equal respect between the two, but the D.O. seem to be a little more well rounded and comfortable interacting with the patients.
Originally posted by PimplePopperMD
It ceases to amaze me. People actually think that D.O's are better at interacting with patients.
That's because of an extensive course on personality that osteopathic folks get but us allopaths don't.
Such a small sample size, ie a few docs, should not sway your decision toward OR away from osteopathy. How much OMM are the osteopaths performing in the ER, anyway?
Honestly, I really just don't think it makes a hoot of difference. You'll find, however, if you wanna be an ER doc, that it may be a bit tougher as a DO (I've been talking with applicants)... But once they're residents, there just ain't a hoot of difference. No, they're not any better or worse with interacting with patients... that's really a personality that you either have or don't BEFORE you even think about medical school..... perhaps the cooler folk are more attracted to osteopathy? That would make DOs better at interacting with patiients, but not because of their education, because of the selection bias.
I applied to both DO and MD. I honestly don't see why everyone doesn't. The osteopathic "philosophy" isn't terribly different from allopathic..
So whatever. I still read these threads sometimes, because I want to see if the same stuff is said about only applying to DO "because of the philosophy"...
i think too many people don't realize that the road to being a physician is a two-laner.