CANES2006 said:
I don't think that holds true in most scenarios. You're argument lets them off too easily. I have been discriminated against by non-Hispanic white professionals who have lived in Miami for the greater part of their adult life. Therefore, they have been exposed to a variety of different races for quite some time and their education should make them know better.
No, I think you are misunderstanding what I mean on at least two levels. One is that the simple presence of URMs is probably necessary but definitely insufficient to dispel prejudices. The problem is that being AROUND some URMs isn't the same thing as being FAMILIAR with them, really getting to know them as human beings. For example, if these people you mentioned are discriminating against you because you are Hispanic and they are white, then they are seeing you as "other," as not like themselves, and they are not getting to know you as YOU. Thus, it is clearly not sufficient to simply throw two people of different backgrounds into a room together and expect that presto, all of their preconceived notions about one another will magically disappear. Stereotypes have to be actively combatted. Even people in multi-ethnic cities like Miami can avoid having to more than superficially examine their own prejudices if they choose, as your example illustrates. However, the presence of people from different backgrounds does increase the chance, IMO, that people will become familiar with them, versus if they are completely surrounded by people exactly like themselves.
Second, I am in no way excusing this behavior, although I am interested in explaining it. However, explanations are not the same thing as excuses. I would agree with you that many of us do not live in rural places where we never even get exposed to people of other ethnicities, and so most of us could, if we choose, get to know people who are different than ourselves. If we choose NOT to do so when we are given the opportunity, then it is certainly fair for someone to call us on that.