There are no "tiers" when it comes to DO schools.
DO programs are DO programs... no matter what... and then there are your "non-brand" MD programs, and then your actual namebrand programs like Stanford, Harvard, Yale, etc.
This change screws over A LOT of students.
SO... if you're cool with going into IM, FM, Peds, Maybe EM, Maybe Anesthesia, Maybe Psych... then DO should be okay.
But you will have to rely on auditions and step 2 and research.
This definitely sucks and thank GOD I entered school at the time I did.
6 more weeks of this crap and I am done and I will drop the best thread ever on this forum to date.
Just wait on it.
I've seen the "a DO is a DO is a DO" comment on here repeatedly and have always questioned its validity. A family member of mine who is a physician, and knew that I was very worried about this change, reached out to a local PD for his perspective on P/F, which seems to be at odds with "there are no tiers in DO schools".
I'll summarize generally:
1. They knew this was coming, and they aren't happy about it.
2. It will make it more difficult to distinguish between allopathic candidates.
3. Sees osteopaths as equivalent to allopaths.
4. Due to a surge in osteopathic applicants over the last couple of years, has become fairly comfortable interpreting COMLEX scores.
5. Invited more osteopaths to interview this year than ever before.
6. Ranked more osteopaths this year than ever before.
7. This change (P/F) will likely negative impact IMG's chances at interviewing and matching.
8. Step 1 was the way to objectively combat school's increasing tendency towards opaqueness with regards to students' performance.
9. Without Step 1, will need to differentiate using what objective metrics remain:
**Medical school attended** + **Step 2 scores**
10. A student coming from an osteopathic school with a strong reputation (lists PCOM, LECOM, among others) will still be attractive.