- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Messages
- 1,601
- Reaction score
- 4
EXACTLY!!BlueSkyCA said:you can not understand what I mean
EXACTLY!!BlueSkyCA said:you can not understand what I mean
BlueSkyCA said:If you are not my aim, you can not understand what I mean
Caverject said:I think some of y'all have had way too many buds!
the answer to the incoherrrannceeeijfijwsdp *vomit*FutureRxGal said:Don't you mean this?
Why am I be nervous? Does it make sense when you said something like that? . If you still don't understand, just forget that.FutureRxGal said:Please help me understand something. Are your multiple smileys indicative of some sort of nervous twitch you have?
I highly doubt that. Regardless of whom you may be aiming, no one can understand your point without at least popping a few blood vessels. In all honesty, it's extremely difficult to comprehend anything you post. Do you honestly not see that???
jdpharmd,jdpharmd? said:EXACTLY!!
BlueSkyCA said:FutureRxGal, I forgot to ask you that who has made me scared or nervous? If you can, let me know.
why are you so angry? Fine, if my "posts are nothing but rubbish", don't you need to get mad.FutureRxGal said:You know what? There is no need in continuing correspondence with an inept, incoherent troll. Your posts are nothing but rubbish, and I'm completely fine with putting them on ignore.
BlueSkyCA said:why are you so angry? Fine, if my "posts are nothing but rubbish", don't you need to get mad.
kwakster928, come down. I did not fight or against anybody here. Don't you see that? Don't get mad. Look back and read all of them to find out who wants to fight. Hope you know.kwakster928 said:meaningless posts makes me mad.... take the fights else where.
BlueSkyCA said:kwakster928, come down. I did not fight or against anybody here. Don't you see that? Don't get mad. Look back and read all of them to find out who wants to fight. Hope you know.
bananaface said:BTW, kwakster, you are in charge of whether or not you get angry. No one can get to you unless you let them.
Originally Posted by BlueSkyCA
ad infinitum
64microbus said:It's easy to pick on the kid that's different, that's frustrated, and that talks weird - but is it satisfying? Sure it's fun to talk smack on a message board; but where's the fun in beating down on an underarmed opponent?
Microbus out
64microbus said:I'm sure Bluesky, Lizard, et al. are intelligent people that can comprehend the hell out of an ochem book; they're most likely very pleasant people also.
bananaface said:I realize you are trying to be a peacemaker, microbus. But, I am kind of bewildered by your position. How do you figure that English as a second language or cultural differences play in? It seems like a random excuse for poor intrapersonal relations.
I also don't think it's fair to infer that people with English as a second language are more likely to misunderstand, get mad, and lash out. It is actually kind of a degrading way of thinking about people.
bananaface said:Microbus, what I am getting at is that you assumed that a group of people are not native English speakers. But, for all we know English could be their first language. Having/using poor communication skills does not mean one has English as their second language. I realize you are trying to be kind. And, I don't want to put you down for that at all. I just don't see how you made the inference that you did.
64microbus said:Seven years of teaching public school in California.
Either (s)he is a second-language learner, or the writer is a native English speaker that went through elementary, middle, high school , and at least some college here in America, and is trying to pursue a career in pharmacy - yet has only developed their grammar skills to a 4th? grade level. I'm thinking the former is more likely.
I agree with you that the thread should return to focusing on HICP. The school itself provides plenty of fodder for us to feed on without going off on these tangents.
Microbus out
Edit: This was my 100th post whoooooooohooooooooooooo!!!!!
JD_USD said:Microbus,
For some reason unbeknownst to us, English is a touchy subject here. I tried to address the issue and....
Check it out: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=141781
FutureRxGal said:I thought we were all agreeing to return this post back to the original topic?
By the way, congratulations, Microbus, on your 100th post.
JD_USD said:Oh hell know! I know you didn't just me.
Just kidding. But isn't the topic pretty dead by now?
AmandaRxs said:Oh hell no, you didn't just misspell something again!!
I couldn't help it........this was TOO tempting!
YIFMBAgoheel said:Can I nominate this thread to be the longest thread ever at SDN? Is there any other one that's longer?
StephenChan UCI said:But didnt their website also state they were in pre-candidtate status way back when the site first appeared? So werent they technically lying to the applicants? Also what other evidence can I bring up to some how try to get my deposist back? Sorry this post has been too long and i dont really feel like skmming the over 300 something posts.
Whether you get the deposit back depends on a few things:StephenChan UCI said:In early March I was accepted to HICP and I payed my $1000 deposist, thinking I was going to attend in the fall. Luckily, a few weeks later I was accepted into UOP. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on getting my 1000 dollar deposist back.
BMBiology said:its website still states it has turned in its application to be reviewed at the ACPE June 2004 meeting which is a lie:
http://www.islandpharmacy.org/accreditation/
The website also states "Currently, the College works with a variety of private lenders to arrange loans for qualified students....In addition to working with students to obtain private student loans, the College also awards a variety of scholarships to qualified students based on merit and financial need" which is BS.
http://www.islandpharmacy.org/admission/finaid.asp
I would call them and tell them if they do not return your deposit, you will file a formal complaint to the ACPE about their deceptions and you will file a law suit in small claims court against the university.