- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 3,707
- Reaction score
- 900
I definitely agree, especially when there are the resources in the shelter and the community to maintain the care and comfort of the animals and work on socializing them. I wish all shelters were able to do that, and I was lucky to volunteer at a no-kill, but unfortunately, there are way too many shelters, esp in the middle of nowhere, where they receive completely inadequate care and live in awful conditions. I want to eventually work in those shelters and improve their conditions and policies, there is so much work that needs to be done with shelters. A lot of the more well off shelters take animals from the high-kill shelters and this definitely helps, but there sadly reaches a point where some of the more fearful or aggressive animals aren't taken elsewhere and will either suffer at crappy shelters or be PTS. I'm really hesitant to support such euths and conflicted on this whole topic, I think a tonnnn of work needs to be done to better the conditions and incr fostering and adoptions, but in the meantime, in certain shelters the suffering might not be worth it for some. 🙁 Thoughts?
P.S. sorry OP for straying from the topic!
Completely agree with ^^. We take animals from all over, Puerto Rico, NJ (my state), down south (NC/SC ish) because we can place dogs faster with our enrichment and adoption programs. A lot of these places ultimately euthanize for space...we ended up getting ~40 puppies a couple of weeks ago. Perfectly healthy puppies that are highly adoptable. Part of the problem is that southern states (hate to generalize, but it's true) don't spay/neuter as much as we do up here. I strongly believe that if shelters were to wake up one day and say "we don't want to kill for space anymore," they could do it. It's mainly a problem of leadership and lack of cooperation among the staff. Some shelters are only open from 12-4, when people are at work, have ridiculous adoption requirements (no pibbles to homes with kids under 10), and aren't open on weekends. If shelter directors really wanted to adopt out more animals, they could do it.
I think if everyone took this attitude, you wouldn't have such crappy shelters. You wouldn't have animals languishing in their feces, never walked or socialized. They would be out the door in less than a month (something my shelter still struggles with, unfortunately) and the animals wouldn't have to deal with long term stress. Euthanization of healthy, adoptable animals is deplorable. If the public sees the shelter as a friendly, inviting place where you can find your new best friend, adoptions will increase. Have programs in place to prevent owner surrenders. It's all possible.
I think we are failing our homeless animals in our shelters. Reform the shelters, and you fix the problem. I mean, I know a shelter in my area (who refuses to work with us because we basically make them look bad--we have volunteers that go over there to walk dogs because they don't get walked otherwise and they don't tell the shelter director they work for my shelter or they would get booted) that is awful with adoptions. Someone goes in and says they want to adopt a pet, and the next day it is euthanized. Ridiculous. We need to make sure the shelters aren't awful places. Once you do that, adoptions will increase and the animals won't need to suffer while they wait for their new homes.