- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 17
enough to make it rain at da club.
enough to make it rain at da club.
They will look at the salaries of cardiologists and radiologists and then b*tch about how it is contributing to out of control Medicare costs. Once that mental image of the "rich doctor" sets in, they will still think of 150-180K (typical for primary care) as a lot of money and maybe too much.
Important to remember that the vocal minority that obsessively respond to those CNN and other news articles do not necessarily represent the views of America. Even if someone didn't think doctor's were all greedy and dishonest, who would feel strongly enough about it to argue with someone that does? I don't think all lawyers are crumby and evil but I'd never spend my time debating on an online news article with someone who's convinced they are. Why should I care?
Even if we ignore the reality that it is not possible to "hide" our compensation from the public (if someone wants to find out how much they're making and is going to get mad about it--they're going to find out and they are probably going to get mad about it), let's remember that we have the potential and perhaps an obligation to make it clear the amount of training we undertake and how salaries are distributed across the profession.
People complain about the salary of pretty much every high paying salary from athletes and lawyers to businessmen and dentists. Healthcare is a hot topic so we're in the hot seat now. Earlier the bailout and overall economy was the hot topic so businessmen were in the hot seat. Our best tool for fighting this type of mob attack is not to try to be passive and hide our salaries (which doesn't have a chance of working) but to be active and defend their value (if one feels compelled to do either).
Actually he is single, no family, works in a private hospital, head of group, used to moonlight, has many hours wow right on it
The income gap needs to be shrunk to the point that primary care doctors who work full time (40+ hrs/week) will make at least 200K. Most currently make less than that.I take issue with anyone who can say that X amount is "way too much for any one person to make" or anything of that sort. Really? Why?
Also, this thread needs a poll.
Also, without adding further to the discussion of where reimbursement is going, I don't plan on making any particular amount of money per year, I just hope I am compensated to an extent that I feel is reflective of my future expertise and work. I want to make enough that I don't feel gipped, whether I'm working 55 hours/week as a Pediatrician, or 100 hours/week as a neurosurgeon. This will obviously be dependent on the current economy of the times and the reimbursement rates of other specialties, but I just want to be happy.
As a side note, does everyone really think that the income gap between specialties needs to be greatly shrunk? Why is the income level of certain specialists considered "obscene" just because it's dramatically higher than others? Not every physician-hour is inherently equal in value, at least IMO.
My goodness, I sometimes wonder why anesthesia isn't more competitive.$450,000
I guess 1 million/ year is enough for two ferraris a mansion and three trophy wives... So let's start there
My goodness, I sometimes wonder why anesthesia isn't more competitive.
Because it requires like 10 or so years just to become one. I think you can become a full-time working physician way before then.
Because it requires like 10 or so years just to become one. I think you can become a full-time working physician way before then.
So how much do doctors really make? I never did any research on the issue, only know that you definitely make enough as a doctor.
Primary care = ?
General Surgeon = ?
Internist = ?
Cardiologist = ?
Radiologist = ?
Anesthesiologist = ?
etc
Because it requires like 10 or so years just to become one. I think you can become a full-time working physician way before then.
Derm - $500k+
gunner.jpg
$450,000
TBH, I think that car looks weird...1 million/yr is enough for two ferraris and a mansion, but three trophy wives....
In the long run, the car is cheaper...
1 million/yr is enough for two ferraris and a mansion, but three trophy wives....
In the long run, the car is cheaper...
Here is an example of the public opinion we face.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/29/980287/-Doctors-should-share-in-the-sacrifice
Wow. What audacious propaganda. Nowhere in the article does the author mention the grueling debt that medical students acquire. And then he goes on to comparing salaries in Europe -where medical education is 6 years out of high school and free!- to USA and then says "lol american doctors need to make sacrifices".
What's sadder is that the readers seem to be buying it.
I wouldn't bother too much about it. It's from the Daily Kos, a "publication" created and run by journalists that are unable to work for any real sort of news company.
I'm interested in radiology. $300k.
Not really. Typical income is around 350K or so.That is far too conservative for that specialty.
But a few years ago the New York Times had a similar article.I wouldn't bother too much about it. It's from the Daily Kos, a "publication" created and run by journalists that are unable to work for any real sort of news company.
TBH, I think that car looks weird...
Now this is more like it:
Not really. Typical income is around 350K or so.
What?Also, wah wah apocalypse always around the corner.
But a few years ago the New York Times had a similar article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/weekinreview/29berenson.html
What?
Of course it's poorly written and void of context and real facts, but the masses tend to swallow this propaganda hook, line, and sinker.That's just a poorly written article. Other than compare salaries between the US and socialized countries - which I think we can all agree doesn't provide any sort of meaningful analysis because of the inherent differences in the systems, especially with respect to how physicians are trained - that article says nothing. It also fails to mention that physician salaries are an EXTREMELY small portion of the overall cost of healthcare.
The end of the golden age is likely upon us. I'll be shocked if radiologists 20 years from now are making the equivalent of $450K on average. If the gap between primary care and specialists is to be narrowed, the ROAD specialties are probably the most obvious choices for cuts.I.e., people are always panicking and always complaining that the end of times is upon us.
The end of the golden age is likely upon us. I'll be shocked if radiologists 20 years from now are making the equivalent of $450K on average. If the gap between primary care and specialists is to be narrowed, the ROAD specialties are probably the most obvious choices for cuts.
*whoosh*
Why the "whoosh"? Do you think these 300K+ salaries will be sustained for non-surgical, lifestyle friendly specialties? Radiology may have to deal with outsourcing and automation (though those threats are currently peripheral with a lot of obstacles currently in the way), anesthesiology has the CRNA problem, derm may have DNPs cut into their market, and all three are at risk of reimbursement cuts. One of my HS friends has a father who is an anesthesiologist, who told him that he'll be lucky to make as much money as they currently are making.
As for ophthalmologists, they have already gone through steep cuts and they now mostly make < $300K.