Frak this is why I can't do the quotes thing, by the time I collect quotes for a big box, I forget the context and what I wanted to say. This is why I typically hit reply to each message and immediately comment, and why I don't read everything to catch up to current and then comment. It flies out of my brain.
Wolf me has a fake narrative, so it's actually easier for me generate content that is not married so closely to the thread and individual posts, btw. I mean call it WIFOM all you want, I definitely do this as a villager (make comments about my gameplay and why it happens the way it does). Anyone can make an effort to do anything as a wolf with intention. The point I'm making here, is here are my thoughts, you decide what is probable. I posted a thing the last game discussing that by nature of the game WW, all things are possible, insert tinfoil hat. But some things are more probable than others, and successful villaging basically relies on one being able to tease that out.
I have notes, and since I'm not EXHAUSTED today like I was yesterday, I hope to make a good reads box and utilize that. Pretty excited actually. I wanted to reply here so I wouldn't forget and to let you know I see this and will get to it.
Lol except that time that AM got you lynch me at lylo and win the game. Not salty. Just a fond memory of one of our lylos together.
2. Lmao. What is this? It's like you took notes about what happened with WM and AM, and now think this is a good way to get an easy mislynch D2 without looking too suspicious. I find it suspicious on the tails of that discussion. I've never seen someone call for someone's death after so little analysis that you've offered so far.
3. Ziggy, you obsess a little much on how consistent people are being. Yes, that is one way to look for wolves. But villagers are inconsistent af because they are in the dark, and that actually makes it more difficult to be consistent. Apparently this instance of quotes with no comments was more confusing to me than when AM did it, and that confusion and annoyance and perception that this was happening more than I liked, prompted me to say something.
While I replied to dolph's post doing this, it wasn't actually directed at anyone specific, hence why I did not call anyone out by name by voting anyone. I'm not going to analyze every time I see someone pulling this game move. Sure, sometimes it's fine. Sometimes it isn't. But I want it to stop and not become a village habit.
Not to mention, when you go to quote someone's post only quoting someone, it doesn't actually show anything in the post. It's therefore annoying to get clarification by hitting reply and asking that person, hey, why did you quote these posts and say nothing? What are you trying to say?
Like, what is the problem here? Generally, if you quote people, you should be able to offer a few words as to why. Sometimes for brevity I don't reread the whole damn quotes, I just read what someone had to write about it, and reread the quotes if I need to.
Or is saving time and making communication easier for the crowd not a reasonable thing to ask villagers to do for each other?
Good for you, I guess.
1. you're having issues because I sound cocky? where? when? petty AF dude
2. that is super sketchy and not true. I have seen people vote for others with less analysis
3. nope, I'm not being obsessive. you're being hypocritical. You called dolphin out for doing something that AM did directly above her. At least be consistent
4. (the rest of this)
GET
OFF
MY
ASS
You have proven time and time again you are completely incapable of interpreting ANYTHING I say correctly. This doesn't even really warrant a response because it is just 100% wrong. You might get further in this game if you stopped to think that other people can see things a different way then you and not be illogical or wrong. I literally won village the last game, so don't even try to talk ****. I had a great plan and saw it through. And I was the one lynching a wolf at the end, you lynching a villager. But, oh, I would get further if I... UH NO I HAVE CONSISTENTLY GONE FAR IN GAMES LAY OFF
edit Idk how to fix the formatting here
and I corrected that I was not calling dolphin out for it specifically, ESPECIALLY when I said IN THAT POST that it was bad gameplay and I would go after the NEXT person who did it.
It was an example. It doesn't mean I was trying to crucify anyone in specific. Why do I say that? Because I see more players than Dolphin doing it.
So there is nothing inconsistent. When I have a thought in reaction to a post, I hit reply and share my thoughts. They are usually related to that particular post, but that doesn't always mean I'm criticizing that particular person. Just you misreading
again with some sort of obsession on consistency that just isn't good.
Why do I say that? Guess what everyone, two players can do a thing, and a 3rd player may call out the 2nd and not the 1st. 100 reasons why this happens, not the least of which is just plain overlooking something.
It's reasonable to ask if someone is singling someone out, why this person and not that person. But sometimes a villager will reply "Just cuz this is what I did."
I STILL DO NOT SEE WHAT IS THE ISSUE WITH SAYING "HEY EVERYONE QUOTING STUFF AND NOT COMMENTING, CAN YOU PLEASE SAY SOMETHING OF YOUR OWN WORDS"
This is what I'm talking about, Ziggy, that you don't seem capable of realizing I was not calling out AM or Dolphin as being wolfy or any such thing. I DO NOT LIKE THE OBSERVATION OF QUOTES AND NO COMMENT and to be frank I'm not even sure I'm registering who's doing it, beyond the fact that I hate seeing it. Universal statement. Just. Stop.
What is even wrong with you people right now?
As far as you being cocky, well, you just went ahead and did it right now.
Uh, you think it's some sort of statement of me sucking in my voting last game where I was voting at the end? Let's consider why I was voting a villager, aka YOU. Because YOU would not get off me. Because YOU couldn't understand what others seemed to, which is that Skim and SP were legit NK choices. Maybe that's not what you would do as a wolf. Kay.
As far as you being cocky, YOU easily could have lost us the game with the tie manuver. Because rather than relying on RNG to win the game for us, we could have won by voting Dina. I'm not saying the responsibility for that relies solely on you. But anyone who was VOTING A VILLAGER AT LYLO doesn't get to pat themselves on the back.
Which is freaking hilarious because I gave reasoning for voting Mel and DocE AND WAS CORRECT when there was every hurdle for me not to be correct (I was a sub in the game, it was very shortly before deadline, yet I was able to identify actual sound reasons they were wolves and correctly vote), yet was, AND YOU gave ME a hard time for patting myself on the back.
Which is rich, because it was only in response to all your freaking hate that I showed up late and got two wolves, that I even said blow me that game, and you were like try not to break your arm patting yourself on the back. And now look here you are patting yourself on the back for an RNG win. Mostly because you couldn't sway Dubz, btw. Do you not even see how anti-village your little pouty comment was, and why that put you on my radar?
Which brings me to another point, I was late to the game, and almost from the start, ASKED WHY DO WE THINK DINA IS A WOLF. So you not succeeding in getting me lynched, you not making the case for the ACTUAL wolf, does not to me seem like something to brag about. Good gameplay is both identifying wolves, and convincing villagers to vote with you. And it isn't winning a lylo by creating a tie and letting RNG do the rest. From what I can tell, we had 50% or more chance of a villager having died.
I'm not trying to crucify you for that game, but you're the one that brought it up just now, in the same breath of saying "I'm not cocky or arrogant." Lol.
