Nor'east Ski WWeekend (Basics) - Game Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I said "when have I responded to a first vote" because you were saying it was weird I didn't respond to your vote when you were the only one on me. I only responded later when I started getting more votes. So it doesn't really have anything to do with people pushing a lynch on me
You don’t have to respond to votes but you can respond to questions or reasons.
 
Except that he was the only viable self-prez candidate
You're missing my point. You're expending no energy trying to push a Lynch away from you onto someone who you actually find wolfy. Instead, you are just voting for someone you think it village. More sketch points for you.
 
I hate all the alternative math that was going on early so capri and cubs get some sketch points for that
Mel is forever sketch and I usually read him wrong. I can't read AM or WZ ever.



This comment feels off. Aren't you fairly new too? How are people supposed to know how you play
The ziggy/barks interaction feels v/w and I'm leaning barks on the wolfy side

lynch Barkley



too soon lol

Those are all the feels I have rn
I found it, where I want to vote

Lynch Mutts

Reasons
1. Listed two players as sketch first
2. Picked a comment from a front runner which was a rhetorical question in response to ziggy... ziggy was making a point about not responding to a lynch vote, and barkley says when have I ever responded to a lynch vote? As ziggy implied she had or would, and barkley is sketch for implying it isn't her playstyle.
3. Has been quiet and I know she is more experienced than this to be contributing more
 
D1 Puppy Slope Skiing Tally

Killerleaf () -
grebes () -
Mel (2) - Skilary, dolphin
AM (1) - capri
MSU () -
Capri (1) - Grebes
WZ (2) - killerleaf, dina
Barks (4) - Ziggy, mutts, snowy, cubs
Cubs (5) - SOV, petmoosy, MJ, genny, Barks
SOV () -
Zigjaz (1) - Mel
Sporty () -
Koffee (2) - SAR, sporty
Snowy (2) - AM, dubz
genny (1) - msu
mutts (1) - koffee

22/23 voting

cubs is in the lead!

Lynch close at 10pm Eastern (~ 45 min)

-skiing-39852.gif
 
I still really like my vote.
Looked into this and her tone is more "IDGAF" than last game so I'm not ready to vote there yet. Do you have specific things besides hedging that you're interpreting wolfy?

Do you want me to try and add reasons or do you want others voting for her? I'm probably super twitchy because I am legit ass stressed out of my mind irl atm.

I'm not trying to make it personal. (Just more irritated you don't like vegetarians and don't like my comments 🤔)
LOL I don't really have anything against vegetarians it was a bit to get a few laughs/likes and amuse myself more than anything haha You're good in my book 😉

Mel disliking vegetarians is news to me. Guess I'll have to dismantle the entire sketch masondry. It was all for naught. Our differences are too powerful. Goodbye cruel world. My life is a lie!

View attachment 249092
I'll miss you
giphy.gif


@genny why shouldn't I vote for you?
 
D1 Puppy Slope Skiing Tally

Killerleaf () -
grebes () -
Mel (2) - Skilary, dolphin
AM (1) - capri
MSU () -
Capri (1) - Grebes
WZ (2) - killerleaf, dina
Barks (4) - Ziggy, mutts, snowy, cubs
Cubs (5) - SOV, petmoosy, MJ, genny, Barks
SOV () -
Zigjaz (1) - Mel
Sporty () -
Coffee (2) - SAR, sporty
Snowy (2) - AM, dubz
genny (1) - MSU
Mutts (1) - coffeebean

22/23 voting
Cubs, you are in the lead!

Still back at the condo? @bryndiana.jones

Lynch close at 10pm Eastern (45 min)

-skiing-39852.gif
 
My reasons on you were more along the route of saying -blank blank and me are all soft cleared for being a woof last time. The whole not so subtle - trust me right off the bat. I'm village bc I say I'm village, ya know? Just to clarify. And I can also dig up the quote that says this if it helps.

As for everything else that has happened recently... imma have to hop on my laptop to address that so I can multi-quote

Sent from my SM-G960U using SDN mobile
Actually, I changed my mind. I don't really have anything that I could multi quote that hasn't already been discussed. (And I'm feeling lazy)

I will just state some early feelings. Honestly, I am not getting wolfy feels from ziggy though. Maybe its because I haven't seen zig wolf (I don't think I have), but I do seem to start some games semi-trusting her so I may need to think on that.

Barks can be sketchy sometimes. I don't like that she contradicted herself about the whole- don't do an easy lynch, have reasons... nobody has reasons on me so I'm a lazy lynch vote. @Barkley you were interested in MSU earlier. I see that you've changed that for self-prez. So, who would you like to lynch if you could vote willy nilly?

A lot of people I'd like to hear more from. But its day one, so I'm sure more people will start showing up soon... at least I hope! Anyways, I'm gonna be away for a bit since I'm going out to dinner. I'm hungry.... but I for one am not eating waffles tonight :laugh:
 
You're missing my point. You're expending no energy trying to push a Lynch away from you onto someone who you actually find wolfy. Instead, you are just voting for someone you think it village. More sketch points for you.
I'm not missing anything, you're just tunneling without actually reading anything I'm saying
 
Looked into this and her tone is more "IDGAF" than last game so I'm not ready to vote there yet. Do you have specific things besides hedging that you're interpreting wolfy?

It's the lack of hedging or any reasoning for that matter. I've never seen her play like this before.
 
I found it, where I want to vote

Lynch Mutts

Reasons
1. Listed two players as sketch first
2. Picked a comment from a front runner which was a rhetorical question in response to ziggy... ziggy was making a point about not responding to a lynch vote, and barkley says when have I ever responded to a lynch vote? As ziggy implied she had or would, and barkley is sketch for implying it isn't her playstyle.
3. Has been quiet and I know she is more experienced than this to be contributing more

I forgot she was in this. I could be persuaded to move here. I'll iso her.
 
I'm not missing anything, you're just tunneling without actually reading anything I'm saying
Still not going to say who you find sketch? K...
I'm reading what you're saying. I may be tunneling but :shrug:
 
I think a cubs Lynch would be lame.
 
Okay, so looked at mutts and apparently she hasn't posted but three times so that'd be why I forgot. Think I'll stay on Snowy for now.
 
I found it, where I want to vote

Lynch Mutts

Reasons
1. Listed two players as sketch first
2. Picked a comment from a front runner which was a rhetorical question in response to ziggy... ziggy was making a point about not responding to a lynch vote, and barkley says when have I ever responded to a lynch vote? As ziggy implied she had or would, and barkley is sketch for implying it isn't her playstyle.
3. Has been quiet and I know she is more experienced than this to be contributing more
Oh I kinda see some of this. I’m gonna go back and reread mutts bc I’d like to actually change a vote to matter or change something and not just say ohhh let’s not lynch the noob.
 
Sorry I was catching up my bad if I asked anything that was already addressed.
I've been trying to do that but her problem was that I didn't respond to her vote even though there was nothing to respond to
I only said that bc my post before this had kinda already been addressed, so my bad guys.
 
Why is it lame? Who wouldn't be? Why?
I think it's lame because I don't see him as wolfy atm. He is new to playing and I feel like everyone just wants to Lynch noobs and its an easy cop out because people here have weird "rules" they want you to follow and if you don't, they think you look weird even if it is just that you haven't gotten the memo that xyz is "sketchy".

Who wouldn't be lame? I mean, I am voting for barks but I could be wrong. It's d1 so I don't have a lot of reads but cubs seems like a cop out to me
 
Okay, so looked at mutts and apparently she hasn't posted but three times so that'd be why I forgot. Think I'll stay on Snowy for now.
This also feels weird. Since when do you give play by plays on your analytical process? Or go from trying to convince other people to join you on a vote to the whole "hmm I'd be willing to go over to this one" line?
 
Oh I kinda see some of this. I’m gonna go back and reread mutts bc I’d like to actually change a vote to matter or change something and not just say ohhh let’s not lynch the noob.
I didn't follow that
 
I think it's lame because I don't see him as wolfy atm. He is new to playing and I feel like everyone just wants to Lynch noobs and its an easy cop out because people here have weird "rules" they want you to follow and if you don't, they think you look weird even if it is just that you haven't gotten the memo that xyz is "sketchy".

Who wouldn't be lame? I mean, I am voting for barks but I could be wrong. It's d1 so I don't have a lot of reads but cubs seems like a cop out to me

I must say thought you're voting for a noob too.
 
I found it, where I want to vote

Lynch Mutts

Reasons
1. Listed two players as sketch first
2. Picked a comment from a front runner which was a rhetorical question in response to ziggy... ziggy was making a point about not responding to a lynch vote, and barkley says when have I ever responded to a lynch vote? As ziggy implied she had or would, and barkley is sketch for implying it isn't her playstyle.
3. Has been quiet and I know she is more experienced than this to be contributing more
I don't really like this vote
 
This also feels weird. Since when do you give play by plays on your analytical process? Or go from trying to convince other people to join you on a vote to the whole "hmm I'd be willing to go over to this one" line?

idk, I thought I always played like this.
 
I must say thought you're voting for a noob too.
I'm a noob. I've played every or almost every game I have with barks. One of the few people I may actually be able to read. Cubs has played half of one game. But barks and I are less noob than cubs.
 
I didn't follow that
I kind of agreed or could see some of what coffee is saying and so I’m going to go and look at mutts to see if I could change my vote there to affect the lynch. Bc everyone says all the time I don’t like this lynch but just sit there until 9:59 and waffle all over the place. So I was also saying let’s not do that. Also people always get stuck on the top two people and not any other viable person on the board.
 
This also feels weird. Since when do you give play by plays on your analytical process? Or go from trying to convince other people to join you on a vote to the whole "hmm I'd be willing to go over to this one" line?
AM has frequently said I could go for this person after peeps don’t move to her person. Depending on her level of stuckness on that person, at least from my observations playing with her.
 
AM has frequently said I could go for this person after peeps don’t move to her person. Depending on her level of stuckness on that person, at least from my observations playing with her.
Hmm. Maybe recency bias on my part. Felt out of character for a lynch she was pushing like that though. Idk, it set off alarm bells.
 
Hmm. Maybe recency bias on my part. Felt out of character for a lynch she was pushing like that though. Idk, it set off alarm bells.
I mean it definitely could be but her pushing of snowy didn’t feel as stuck as she normally is with folks but I’m not 100% on that.
 
Top