My school does not have a committee letter, so I have individual letters from the following:
- Science Professor
- 2 Non-Sci Professors (Public Health, Humanities)
- MD supervisor for Gap Year Clinical Employment *
- Manager for Non-Clinical Employment
- MD supervisor for Clinical Volunteering *
- PI from 3 yrs Research *
Many schools only allow 3 individual letters, and I feel that while none are bad or average letters, the Science Professor is probably not the strongest out of them all. I don't want to send extras to follow directions / since I wouldn't be able to control what is read.
What are Admissions Committee goals of LORs? Are they mostly for ascertaining academic rigor and I should always include the science and non-science prof LORs? Or could I include 3 others that potentially meet the goals of the school better (ex: clinical volunteering for schools emphasizing service)?
The starred letters above are my strongest and most long-term relationships, but include no purely academic letters.
As an applicant who has taken 2 gap years, I'm including the clinical employment letter for all schools as its my most recent activity. I would appreciate any advice for how to prioritize if there are only 3 letters allowed.