Official 2019 Rank Order Lists

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Approaching psychiatric distress as composed of a series of discrete, categorical disorders afflicting the individual which require specific and sensitive diagnosis before being intervened upon by a team of trained specialist is frankly paradigmatic of the medical model and not at all a departure.
For BWH "comorbidities" is not psychiatric diagnosis-- psychiatrists specialize to diagnose and treat the psychiatric distress that manifest differently in populations with different major medical problems: GI, Obgyn, etc. I don't know Pitt very well, it would be helpful if you can comment on how much of the traditional medical/biological model is still at play?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
How would you rank the following 6 programs solely based on their prestige / academic reputation in psychiatry?

- WashU
- Duke
- UTSW
- U of Michigan
- U of Maryland
- Mayo


I’d like to pursue an academic career, probably spending more time doing research than clinical work. I’d like to end up in one of those research powerhouses in NYC eventually, as my family’s from there. My current interests include childhood disorders and psychosis.

My husband and I have visited all the programs together and agreed that we’d be happy to live in any of these cities. They all seem to have great training, research, and mentorship. I’d be happy to match at any of them, really, so I’ve been having a hard time making my rank order list.

To make things simple, I’ve decided to rank these programs solely based on prestige—how much weight their names carry in academia, and how much they’ll be able to help me throughout my academic career.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 
How would you rank the following 6 programs solely based on their prestige / academic reputation in psychiatry?

- WashU
- Duke
- UTSW
- U of Michigan
- U of Maryland
- Mayo

You are going to get 200+ different answers, but me personally
1a UTSW
1b Duke
WashU
Mich
Mayo
Maryland
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
@MortonSaltGirl ,refer to the following 2 comments listed below, which appeared earlier in the thread. You’re not going to get sufficient help on this forum unless you start by providing your own personal impressions of these programs (as well as your perceptions of their academic strengths).


I don't have enough specific knowledge to give you an exhaustive overview of each program's relative strengths and weaknesses--it was your job as an applicant to try and gauge those things where relevant to you by asking good questions on your interview days and talking to mentors/faculty/residents at your institution.

I brought this up in the (sadly extremely quiet) interview review thread but will mention it again- if you want help with programs you should pay it forward and give your impressions about the programs you've interviewed at. To be generous there are maybe ~20 active residents and attendings on this forum. Most of us have only gone to one program and have foggy memories of the others we interviewed at. You all are each other's best resource, and it would be incredibly helpful for everyone if people who wanted opinions about programs also posted reviews or at least some impressions about the programs you've interviewed at.


I'm not trying to be snarky, I really just have no idea how to answer the "I'm interested in X very broad area and want advice on these 7 programs" posts that have been happening here. It's much easier if we can read your impressions, hear what you like and didn't like about programs, and something more specific about your interests. That way you all can help each other as well!
 
gunna ask this again with some more details about my goals/interests/details about the programs since i didnt get any responses the first time and also based on what ppl have written above:

anyone have any thoughts on mt sinai vs nyu?

im interested in adolescent psychiatry/teen mental health and doing inpatient work with adolescents in the future. got an mph during medical school so hoping to work with public health stuff in the future in addition to practicing - likely with teen mental health programs/education.

my current thoughts: bellevue seems like it would be a great place to train for both of those and you'd see so much - especially since they have a separate unit for teens and children, and even a public school in the hospital for teens, as well as a separate child psych ED which is rare but nyu residents seem more stressed/overworked. they also seem to be a bit forensics heavy, which is not really for me. from my impression, the residents at mt sinai seemed pretty happy and kinda more chill. mt sinai also seems to have good options for CAP training, with some partial hospital programs and adolescent outpatient clinics you could rotate at. and i like how mt sinai gives you a lot of elective time and more opportunities to explore your interests. also a fan of their emphasis on didactics/learning as a main goal.

meanwhile while nyu seemed much more structured from what i could tell with more call/less elective time, and overall more of a working and less of a learning program (some residents said they couldnt go to didactics sometimes bc they had to finish up work on the floors - so didactics is not really protected time...). meanwhile sinai specifically said they were the opposite with didactics always being protected, even on off-service rotations, which i think is pretty awesome. in regards to sinai though, not sure about how i feel about doing 6 straight months full time at the VA 2nd year which mt sinai makes you do. they seem to be kinda va heavy in general which im not really that excited about...

thoughts anyone?
 
@MortonSaltGirl ,refer to the following 2 comments listed below, which appeared earlier in the thread. You’re not going to get sufficient help on this forum unless you start by providing your own personal impressions of these programs (as well as your perceptions of their academic strengths).

You don't have to try so hard to flamebait/troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You don't have to try so hard to flamebait/troll.


Actually, I was not trolling. I desire a productive conversation on this forum just as much as the next person. That is why I reposted advice that I felt would make the conversation effective, since the user in question is new to SDN and presumably had not seen the previous discussion that had taken place.

Peace and love.
 
gunna ask this again with some more details about my goals/interests/details about the programs since i didnt get any responses the first time and also based on what ppl have written above:

anyone have any thoughts on mt sinai vs nyu?

im interested in adolescent psychiatry/teen mental health and doing inpatient work with adolescents in the future. got an mph during medical school so hoping to work with public health stuff in the future in addition to practicing - likely with teen mental health programs/education.

my current thoughts: bellevue seems like it would be a great place to train for both of those and you'd see so much - especially since they have a separate unit for teens and children, and even a public school in the hospital for teens, as well as a separate child psych ED which is rare but nyu residents seem more stressed/overworked. they also seem to be a bit forensics heavy, which is not really for me. from my impression, the residents at mt sinai seemed pretty happy and kinda more chill. mt sinai also seems to have good options for CAP training, with some partial hospital programs and adolescent outpatient clinics you could rotate at. and i like how mt sinai gives you a lot of elective time and more opportunities to explore your interests. also a fan of their emphasis on didactics/learning as a main goal.

meanwhile while nyu seemed much more structured from what i could tell with more call/less elective time, and overall more of a working and less of a learning program (some residents said they couldnt go to didactics sometimes bc they had to finish up work on the floors - so didactics is not really protected time...). meanwhile sinai specifically said they were the opposite with didactics always being protected, even on off-service rotations, which i think is pretty awesome. in regards to sinai though, not sure about how i feel about doing 6 straight months full time at the VA 2nd year which mt sinai makes you do. they seem to be kinda va heavy in general which im not really that excited about...

thoughts anyone?
Hi, you described your impressions of the two programs and your interests and goals really well, but it’s still hard to answer your question.
Based on what I picked up while being a med student in NYC, conversations with psychiatry residents at NYC programs and what I remember from my interviews, my overall impression of these two programs mirrors yours. Basically, NYU has a well established track of strong training with notable opportunities for working with underserved, severe mental illness, forensic population. Their child training is also much stronger than that of an average general psychiatry program. But it’s true that their residents are some of the most overworked and miserable (aside from the frankly malignant sweatshop programs). On the other hand, MtSinai residents are indeed some of the happiest, and their workload is on the lower end among the NYC programs (along with Einstein and MtSinai-Beth Israel); basically, NYU and MtSinai residents are on the opposite ends of the exhaustion spectrum. And... how should I put it... I was thoroughly impressed by MtSinai research track; they’re really putting a lot of money and effort to become *the* neuroscience/psychiatry research center in NYC. But I was not nearly as impressed by their clinical training, including the concerns about large parts of training being at the VA. Regarding child, there is only one child inpatient unit in the MtSinai system, and it’s at St. Luke’s. From what I remember (correct me if I’m wrong), MtSinai-main residents don’t routinely rotate there, but I don’t know if you could arrange an elective - something you could ask the program.

I wrote so much without really telling you anything useful. Bottom line is, at least from my point of view, your perception of the programs reflects the reality and is fairly nuanced, and I don’t know if any new pieces of information about the programs would be helpful in making your decision. Basically, you need to be honest with yourself and decide if you’re resilient and ambitious enough to go through the grind to get a stronger training and a broader experience at NYU, or if you would prefer to have more time and energy to figure out your own career path at MtSinai. Both are reasonable options but only you can decide which one is right for you. And just to make it clear, by saying I was not quite impressed by the clinical training at MtSinai I don’t mean that it’s poor, just not on par with the other top NYC programs and a far cry from their awesome research program. In any case, completing your residency at MtSinai will most definitely not close any doors for you.
 
How would you rank the following 6 programs solely based on their prestige / academic reputation in psychiatry?

- WashU
- Duke
- UTSW
- U of Michigan
- U of Maryland
- Mayo


I’d like to pursue an academic career, probably spending more time doing research than clinical work. I’d like to end up in one of those research powerhouses in NYC eventually, as my family’s from there. My current interests include childhood disorders and psychosis.

My husband and I have visited all the programs together and agreed that we’d be happy to live in any of these cities. They all seem to have great training, research, and mentorship. I’d be happy to match at any of them, really, so I’ve been having a hard time making my rank order list.

To make things simple, I’ve decided to rank these programs solely based on prestige—how much weight their names carry in academia, and how much they’ll be able to help me throughout my academic career.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!

I'm not in the SE so my ranking is a little different from @TexasPhysician as foretold by the prophecy:

1. WashU/Duke
2. Michigan
3. Maryland
4. UTSW
5. Mayo

I think we can all mostly agree that in any of these lists Mayo belongs near the bottom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
For BWH "comorbidities" is not psychiatric diagnosis-- psychiatrists specialize to diagnose and treat the psychiatric distress that manifest differently in populations with different major medical problems: GI, Obgyn, etc. I don't know Pitt very well, it would be helpful if you can comment on how much of the traditional medical/biological model is still at play?

I think when you say medical model you just mean pharmaceuticals. When I and most people who think about this sort of thing say 'medical model" they are talking about the conceptualization I described above - diagnosis, (relatively) specific treatment intervention, repeat. The disorder is a discrete and reified entity that is separable from the individual and can be specified independently. There is an underlying pathology and unusual aspects of any case are just sort of "atypical features" or some kind of noise masking the "true" disorder. Absent are any elements of meaning-making, a generally dimensional approach to phenomenology, and a recovery orientation based primarily on symptom control.

This model works well and is supportable in some circumstances but not all. Specific CBT protocols targeting, say, Social Anxiety Disorder are not medications per se but they absolutely fit the medical model. now as the transdiagnostic approach to evidence-based therapies gains traction we can talk about a partial departure from the medical model.

If you specifically want to be a psychiatrist focusing on treating distress in medical patients then you are really talking about doing consult/liaison work, which of course often leans hard into the medical model.

WPH/UPMC is a big institution (200+ shrinks on faculty in the department) so it is hard to generalize with 100% accuracy, but it is probably the case that more people around here embrace a traditional medical model than not. That is where the research funding is, after all.
 
Any thoughts on Michigan versus Emory (besides obvious climate differences)? I’m fairly undifferentiated but have an interest in community psychiatry which makes me lean towards Emory, but their call schedule seemed horrific.
 
Any thoughts on Michigan versus Emory (besides obvious climate differences)? I’m fairly undifferentiated but have an interest in community psychiatry which makes me lean towards Emory, but their call schedule seemed horrific.
I know both PDs well, and they're both great human beings, very high in personal integrity, and in the thick of things as far as promotion and advocacy of graduate medical education.

Michigan's community psych training is not lacking--the county mental health system is well integrated with the program as far as I recall.

And lifestyle-wise, what you'll find to be more important than weather will be the contrast between Ann Arbor (good-sized midwest college town) and Atlanta (southern megalopolis).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
I know both PDs well, and they're both great human beings, very high in personal integrity, and in the thick of things as far as promotion and advocacy of graduate medical education.

Michigan's community psych training is not lacking--the county mental health system is well integrated with the program as far as I recall.

And lifestyle-wise, what you'll find to be more important than weather will be the contrast between Ann Arbor (good-sized midwest college town) and Atlanta (southern megalopolis).

Appreciate your reply. I really liked both PD's as well and felt I'd be well-supported at both. The location is a draw for me; I liked Atlanta/the southern megalopolis--it was so green!--and I love the Midwest and college towns.

Word on the street is that Michigan residents are overworked--not sure if you or anyone else have heard this? They didn't seem like it to me, whereas the Emory residents were quite honest about how much their call schedule during PGY-2 (insert expletives here) sucked.
 
Appreciate your reply. I really liked both PD's as well and felt I'd be well-supported at both. The location is a draw for me; I liked Atlanta/the southern megalopolis--it was so green!--and I love the Midwest and college towns.

Word on the street is that Michigan residents are overworked--not sure if you or anyone else have heard this? They didn't seem like it to me, whereas the Emory residents were quite honest about how much their call schedule during PGY-2 (insert expletives here) sucked.
ALL residents think they are overworked. And ALL CALL #@%*ing sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I am going to take the advice that was given on this thread and ask my question again: what are people's impression of GW?

I really enjoyed the program when I visited. The PD and aPD were great, had one of my favorite interviews of this season with a faculty member. People were friendly but thought that the class is a bit too small for me, the call was on the heavier end. Location is pretty awesome given that my SO and I love DC.

I think it was odd that GW doesn't have involuntary hospitalization, per one of the residents this doesn't affect training. I am also wary about what happened with the resident with cancer, even though GW is probably not at fault. I also keep hearing about how malignant the program is, and that's very difficult to tell during one visit

I'm sure many others are agonizing over ROL, but this is killing me because I am trying to decide between GW vs UT-Austin (unsure about strength of program) vs BIDMC (not ideal location)
 
I am also wary about what happened with the resident with cancer, even though GW is probably not at fault. I also keep hearing about how malignant the program is, and that's very difficult to tell during one visit

I understand your concern, and this was partly discussed over on the google doc but I'll also reiterate it here. After reading through the case about the resident with cancer, it was abundantly clear to me that GW did everything they could to salvage what was a ****ty situation. It actually seems like the program does a lot to support residents (which I'm sure is similar at other programs as well) and reminded me that PD/APDs do so much more than recruitment. That being said, I wasn't there, I'm not a lawyer, I'm just another applicant.

My impression of GW was that it's the strongest program in DC for child exposure (affiliation with Childrens National), forensics, consult, and policy. I also really liked the PD and APD. Overall I thought I'd be happy there and they're high up on my rank list. So there's my 2 cents!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Any advice?
I was planning on ranking Program X above Program Y. However, this week I got some post-interview communication from Program X that was sort of generic and lukewarm (they have sent stronger things to other applicants). I had previously received positive post-interview feedback from Program Y (I am aware they have sent less positive/more generic things to other applicants). Should this information influence my ROL at all? Should I consider ranking Program Y above Program X now, especially since they are sort of equal in my mind?
 
Any advice?
I was planning on ranking Program X above Program Y. However, this week I got some post-interview communication from Program X that was sort of generic and lukewarm (they have sent stronger things to other applicants). I had previously received positive post-interview feedback from Program Y (I am aware they have sent less positive/more generic things to other applicants). Should this information influence my ROL at all? Should I consider ranking Program Y above Program X now, especially since they are sort of equal in my mind?

No, rank programs by how you like them. Nothing else matters. Post interview communication means nothing and should not change your rank list in any way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Any advice?
I was planning on ranking Program X above Program Y. However, this week I got some post-interview communication from Program X that was sort of generic and lukewarm (they have sent stronger things to other applicants). I had previously received positive post-interview feedback from Program Y (I am aware they have sent less positive/more generic things to other applicants). Should this information influence my ROL at all? Should I consider ranking Program Y above Program X now, especially since they are sort of equal in my mind?
No. Trying to get into our heads to determine how much we love you is the wrong move. Keep your ego independent of how far down your rank list you go and rank them as you like them. Your ability to determine what programs think of you based on communication or lack of communication is highly flawed. Playing the game you suggest can only hurt you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Could really use some help figuring out this rank list... I have a top 8 that I truly haven’t been able to whittle down. I’m fairly certain at the top is UNC, Vanderbilt, and Northwestern. Then theres Celeveland Clinic, Case Western, OHSU, Emory and Michigan. I gelled fairly well with everyone at all of these programs, except Emory (they seemed EXHAUSTED). Little background: I’m from a mid sized mid western city, so while I’m used to the cold and snow, I’d love to escape. I’m not sure my interests quite yet, but leaning CL, CAP, or Forensics. I don’t have a strong research inclination as of now, and want to focus more on psychosis and mania in an inpatient setting. I feel like I came out loving each interview....

For my top 3:
1. UNC: felt like I gelled best with the residents here. However, the schedule seems like a lot, and I’ve heard through the grapevine individuals at this program frequently are burnt out but I couldn’t get a feel for that my day of. I also wasn’t obsessed with the city, but I could survive a more college town feel

2. Vandy: favorite city for sure, and I got along well with the assistant PD’s at this program. However some people have told me they got a weird vibe at this location from residents. They had all the electives I was looking for

3. Northwestern: Chicago is definitely a fun city even if it’s cold, and the facilities were gorgeous. This has all the electives and fellowships I could ask for, and the name could get me places. The unfortunate thing is there seems to be the theory that these residents are also incredibly burnt out.

OHSU would be higher on this list if someone there hadn’t mentioned to me that if I’m gung-ho child, maybe it wasn’t the place for me since they don’t do any inpatient during those 4 years.

Long post, but any help/input would be appreciated!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Could really use some help figuring out this rank list... I have a top 8 that I truly haven’t been able to whittle down. I’m fairly certain at the top is UNC, Vanderbilt, and Northwestern. Then theres Celeveland Clinic, Case Western, OHSU, Emory and Michigan. I gelled fairly well with everyone at all of these programs, except Emory (they seemed EXHAUSTED). Little background: I’m from a mid sized mid western city, so while I’m used to the cold and snow, I’d love to escape. I’m not sure my interests quite yet, but leaning CL, CAP, or Forensics. I don’t have a strong research inclination as of now, and want to focus more on psychosis and mania in an inpatient setting. I feel like I came out loving each interview....

For my top 3:
1. UNC: felt like I gelled best with the residents here. However, the schedule seems like a lot, and I’ve heard through the grapevine individuals at this program frequently are burnt out but I couldn’t get a feel for that my day of. I also wasn’t obsessed with the city, but I could survive a more college town feel

2. Vandy: favorite city for sure, and I got along well with the assistant PD’s at this program. However some people have told me they got a weird vibe at this location from residents. They had all the electives I was looking for

3. Northwestern: Chicago is definitely a fun city even if it’s cold, and the facilities were gorgeous. This has all the electives and fellowships I could ask for, and the name could get me places. The unfortunate thing is there seems to be the theory that these residents are also incredibly burnt out.

OHSU would be higher on this list if someone there hadn’t mentioned to me that if I’m gung-ho child, maybe it wasn’t the place for me since they don’t do any inpatient during those 4 years.

Long post, but any help/input would be appreciated!

Didn't interview at UNC or Northwestern but--I was worried about this "weird vibe" at Vanderbilt based previous interview reviews on SDN but didn't get that feeling at all. Everyone I met was extremely nice, down-to-earth, smart, cool, and happy. On the flip side, I definitely got a weird vibe at Case Western.

Potential weakness about Vanderbilt for you: no Forensics fellowship, but they seem to have a good track record of placing people in Forensics fellowships. The PhD who does a lot of Forensics assessments and supervises the PGY-4's on their rotation was awesome.
 
Is anyone familiar with OHSU? I really liked it when I visited, but these visits are so short. I know this place used to be a workhorse but has since changed. Knowing myself, I don't do well in a super intense, workhorse type environment. Wondering if ohsu really is as laid back as some residents were making it on interview day. Thanks!
 
Hi, you described your impressions of the two programs and your interests and goals really well, but it’s still hard to answer your question.
Based on what I picked up while being a med student in NYC, conversations with psychiatry residents at NYC programs and what I remember from my interviews, my overall impression of these two programs mirrors yours. Basically, NYU has a well established track of strong training with notable opportunities for working with underserved, severe mental illness, forensic population. Their child training is also much stronger than that of an average general psychiatry program. But it’s true that their residents are some of the most overworked and miserable (aside from the frankly malignant sweatshop programs). On the other hand, MtSinai residents are indeed some of the happiest, and their workload is on the lower end among the NYC programs (along with Einstein and MtSinai-Beth Israel); basically, NYU and MtSinai residents are on the opposite ends of the exhaustion spectrum. And... how should I put it... I was thoroughly impressed by MtSinai research track; they’re really putting a lot of money and effort to become *the* neuroscience/psychiatry research center in NYC. But I was not nearly as impressed by their clinical training, including the concerns about large parts of training being at the VA. Regarding child, there is only one child inpatient unit in the MtSinai system, and it’s at St. Luke’s. From what I remember (correct me if I’m wrong), MtSinai-main residents don’t routinely rotate there, but I don’t know if you could arrange an elective - something you could ask the program.

I wrote so much without really telling you anything useful. Bottom line is, at least from my point of view, your perception of the programs reflects the reality and is fairly nuanced, and I don’t know if any new pieces of information about the programs would be helpful in making your decision. Basically, you need to be honest with yourself and decide if you’re resilient and ambitious enough to go through the grind to get a stronger training and a broader experience at NYU, or if you would prefer to have more time and energy to figure out your own career path at MtSinai. Both are reasonable options but only you can decide which one is right for you. And just to make it clear, by saying I was not quite impressed by the clinical training at MtSinai I don’t mean that it’s poor, just not on par with the other top NYC programs and a far cry from their awesome research program. In any case, completing your residency at MtSinai will most definitely not close any doors for you.

Awesome thank you so much for your thoughts!!! They were super helpful :) Yea I figured it would likely come down to me having to decide personally which is a better fit for me...guess I have some thinking to do in the next few weeks!
 
So trying to figure out some middle ranks. I'm deciding between UVA, UMass, KUMC, St. Elizabeth, Temple.

1. UVA is closer to home and I felt like the program is beautiful. Solid variety of population and cases. But I also feel like the program is a workaholic nightmare. Like 70-80 hours of work for first two years. And then a significantly high volume of outpatient cases to follow 3rd year on. I feel like as a whole I would be stuck toiling here. But I did feel like the residents, PD, and faculty were very cool people. I am extremely concerned about the fact that 3 residents were fired here. 2 of which were fired for being kind of slow at keeping up with their work....

2. Umass. Absolutely loved the program. Absolutely hated Worchester. Not sure how to balance this. I felt a strong connection with the faculty.

3. KUMC. Felt like the program is pretty decent. Solid training and in a pretty decent city with decent quality of life. I felt like there was a weak foundation for therapy training here. Overall I have more positive thoughts

4. St. E. It's close to home. I feel like the quality of life is solid. You'll be able to very easily balance your work with your life quality, ex ppl say 45-50 hours a week on psych. I feel like it's a pretty standard community program and there's a standard amount of issues associated with it, ex. relying on other institutes for rotations. Vacation and sick days are earned 4 hrs per paycheck which somewhat frightens me. But we do get national or DC holidays off, so in the end we get a very good amount of time. Solid therapy and outpatient community training. If this were a university program or was a more academic program I would probably rank it higher, but as it is now I feel inclined to rank it lower despite being in a solid place to live.

5. Temple is a solid program. But I feel like it's very stand alone psych hospital feeling. I also am not entirely happy about 3 months of psych night float first year. Likewise I feel like there's too much addiction training here. Likewise too much psychodynamic/analytic. That being said I felt like I would be an extremely well trained doctor here. But also felt like there's gonna be a steep learning curve first year.

My goals are in the end to be local where I am happiest, go to a solid program with solid training and experience. And to overall be able to balance life and work. I'm fine working 60 hours on average, but more I feel like will mean I'm just back to doing medical school no lifing. I want to go do outpatient psychiatry, TMS/ECT, addiction.
 
So trying to figure out some middle ranks. I'm deciding between UVA, UMass, KUMC, St. Elizabeth, Temple.

1. UVA is closer to home and I felt like the program is beautiful. Solid variety of population and cases. But I also feel like the program is a workaholic nightmare. Like 70-80 hours of work for first two years. And then a significantly high volume of outpatient cases to follow 3rd year on. I feel like as a whole I would be stuck toiling here. But I did feel like the residents, PD, and faculty were very cool people. I am extremely concerned about the fact that 3 residents were fired here. 2 of which were fired for being kind of slow at keeping up with their work....

2. Umass. Absolutely loved the program. Absolutely hated Worchester. Not sure how to balance this. I felt a strong connection with the faculty.

3. KUMC. Felt like the program is pretty decent. Solid training and in a pretty decent city with decent quality of life. I felt like there was a weak foundation for therapy training here. Overall I have more positive thoughts

4. St. E. It's close to home. I feel like the quality of life is solid. You'll be able to very easily balance your work with your life quality, ex ppl say 45-50 hours a week on psych. I feel like it's a pretty standard community program and there's a standard amount of issues associated with it, ex. relying on other institutes for rotations. Vacation and sick days are earned 4 hrs per paycheck which somewhat frightens me. But we do get national or DC holidays off, so in the end we get a very good amount of time. Solid therapy and outpatient community training. If this were a university program or was a more academic program I would probably rank it higher, but as it is now I feel inclined to rank it lower despite being in a solid place to live.

5. Temple is a solid program. But I feel like it's very stand alone psych hospital feeling. I also am not entirely happy about 3 months of psych night float first year. Likewise I feel like there's too much addiction training here. Likewise too much psychodynamic/analytic. That being said I felt like I would be an extremely well trained doctor here. But also felt like there's gonna be a steep learning curve first year.

My goals are in the end to be local where I am happiest, go to a solid program with solid training and experience. And to overall be able to balance life and work. I'm fine working 60 hours on average, but more I feel like will mean I'm just back to doing medical school no lifing. I want to go do outpatient psychiatry, TMS/ECT, addiction.

Based on the tone I interpreted from your post and your goals, here's my imaginary rank list for you:
St. E's, UMass, KUMC, UVA, Temple.
St. E's sounded the most well balanced for your quality of life needs, and it seemed like the reservations you had fell into the realm of more reputation/community vs academic center based, which unless you're going into research doesn't seem like it would be that huge of a difference. And you want outpatient psych and TMS/ECT etc, and it provides enough volume and pathology, plus it's close to home.
UMass you stated you absolutely loved, so I thought that would go second for you. I lived in Boston, so I'm familiar with Worcester and can see why you'd be like meh, but if you felt connected with the folks there, then I feel like it earns a higher spot.
KUMC seemed overall solid, so might as well toss it in the middle
UVA I put fourth in your list because you didn't want a ton of work hours/work horse life and having interviewed there too, I feel like that's a pretty huge component of their program. And even the words you used in writing about it were kinda telling, "nightmare," "stuck," "toiling," you want to be somewhere you can find that balance. And yeah, the resident firings make things murky. All in all, this one seemed the riskiest for you.
And then Temple, I put last because your review of it sounded the most negative despite having positive points in there. It had the most drawbacks based on the things you want.
Anyway, that's my two cents. Good luck from a fellow applicant!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Based on the tone I interpreted from your post and your goals, here's my imaginary rank list for you:
St. E's, UMass, KUMC, UVA, Temple.
St. E's sounded the most well balanced for your quality of life needs, and it seemed like the reservations you had fell into the realm of more reputation/community vs academic center based, which unless you're going into research doesn't seem like it would be that huge of a difference. And you want outpatient psych and TMS/ECT etc, and it provides enough volume and pathology, plus it's close to home.
UMass you stated you absolutely loved, so I thought that would go second for you. I lived in Boston, so I'm familiar with Worcester and can see why you'd be like meh, but if you felt connected with the folks there, then I feel like it earns a higher spot.
KUMC seemed overall solid, so might as well toss it in the middle
UVA I put fourth in your list because you didn't want a ton of work hours/work horse life and having interviewed there too, I feel like that's a pretty huge component of their program. And even the words you used in writing about it were kinda telling, "nightmare," "stuck," "toiling," you want to be somewhere you can find that balance. And yeah, the resident firings make things murky. All in all, this one seemed the riskiest for you.
And then Temple, I put last because your review of it sounded the most negative despite having positive points in there. It had the most drawbacks based on the things you want.
Anyway, that's my two cents. Good luck from a fellow applicant!

That you very much for the response. Honestly if UMASS was somewhere else I'd rank it highest in this list. KUMC is in my opinion a very middle of the road feeling program. St. Es I feel like there are draw backs, but it'll accomplish the job. Temple, I'm not gonna lie I really need to think more on to have a solid idea on. 3 months of nights is awful, but if that's the only bad thing to the program then it's tolerable.
 
@TexasPhysician @clausewitz2 Thank you very much for your input, I appreciate it!

@StarFish19 @FlowRate @Evidence Based My apologies. As I’ve decided to rank them solely based on their prestige, I originally thought my impressions from the interviews would be quite irrelevant. Here are my impressions:

WashU: Strong research. I was impressed that there’s no specific dedicated research residency track, because anyone who’s interested can hop onto it. St. Louis wasn’t as miserable as I had imagined.

Duke: The research faculty and resources was impressive, although residents didn’t seem to be much involved in research in comparison (maybe because of the workload?). Strong foundation in medicine, and Med-Psych seemed very solid.

UMich: The program seemed incredibly supportive and flexible. Heard many stories of how the PD managed to work things out to meet the residents’ needs and interests. Great mentorship.

UTSW: I absolutely loved the PD here. Although my husband and I liked all the cities I’ve interviewed at, Dallas was certainly a wonderful city to live in. Seemed like the research mecca of Texas.

Mayo: Strong C&L, beautiful medical campus. I did have a feeling that the psych department was not as big as I would have imagined it to be, considering the size of the campus. Rochester was a pleasant small town.

UMaryland: Very strong psychotherapy. Strong psychosis research at MPRC. Sheppard Pratt is definitely a jewel, with fascinating units for trauma disorders, eating disorders, and retreat (intensive program for treatment-resistant depression)

That being said, my husband and I have decided that they are pretty much on par with one another for us. We don’t have any geographical preference and I’d be happy to match at any of them.

Thus I’ve decided to make the rank order list solely based on their academic reputation, and I’d love to hear any other input on how you guys would rank them in terms of prestige. Many thanks!
 
MD/PhD here, with research/academic interests. Trying to decide my top...

My "best interests" are with MGH. Great support and learning environment. Outstanding resources (i.e., mentors, funding) for research. Of course, prestige.
My "happiness" is at UMD/Sherppard Pratt. I LOVED the place, residents and administration. I received the best vibes in the whole interview season.
My "brain" is at Mount Sinai. Great support for research (i.e., funding, time) and the mentors I would like to work with are there.
My "heart" is at Emory. Great staff, wonderful residents. Great communication, hey have truly earned my heart. <3
Help...

Hi, you described your impressions of the two programs and your interests and goals really well, but it’s still hard to answer your question.
Based on what I picked up while being a med student in NYC, conversations with psychiatry residents at NYC programs and what I remember from my interviews, my overall impression of these two programs mirrors yours. Basically, NYU has a well established track of strong training with notable opportunities for working with underserved, severe mental illness, forensic population. Their child training is also much stronger than that of an average general psychiatry program. But it’s true that their residents are some of the most overworked and miserable (aside from the frankly malignant sweatshop programs). On the other hand, MtSinai residents are indeed some of the happiest, and their workload is on the lower end among the NYC programs (along with Einstein and MtSinai-Beth Israel); basically, NYU and MtSinai residents are on the opposite ends of the exhaustion spectrum. And... how should I put it... I was thoroughly impressed by MtSinai research track; they’re really putting a lot of money and effort to become *the* neuroscience/psychiatry research center in NYC. But I was not nearly as impressed by their clinical training, including the concerns about large parts of training being at the VA. Regarding child, there is only one child inpatient unit in the MtSinai system, and it’s at St. Luke’s. From what I remember (correct me if I’m wrong), MtSinai-main residents don’t routinely rotate there, but I don’t know if you could arrange an elective - something you could ask the program.

I wrote so much without really telling you anything useful. Bottom line is, at least from my point of view, your perception of the programs reflects the reality and is fairly nuanced, and I don’t know if any new pieces of information about the programs would be helpful in making your decision. Basically, you need to be honest with yourself and decide if you’re resilient and ambitious enough to go through the grind to get a stronger training and a broader experience at NYU, or if you would prefer to have more time and energy to figure out your own career path at MtSinai. Both are reasonable options but only you can decide which one is right for you. And just to make it clear, by saying I was not quite impressed by the clinical training at MtSinai I don’t mean that it’s poor, just not on par with the other top NYC programs and a far cry from their awesome research program. In any case, completing your residency at MtSinai will most definitely not close any doors for you.

gunna ask this again with some more details about my goals/interests/details about the programs since i didnt get any responses the first time and also based on what ppl have written above:

anyone have any thoughts on mt sinai vs nyu?

im interested in adolescent psychiatry/teen mental health and doing inpatient work with adolescents in the future. got an mph during medical school so hoping to work with public health stuff in the future in addition to practicing - likely with teen mental health programs/education.

my current thoughts: bellevue seems like it would be a great place to train for both of those and you'd see so much - especially since they have a separate unit for teens and children, and even a public school in the hospital for teens, as well as a separate child psych ED which is rare but nyu residents seem more stressed/overworked. they also seem to be a bit forensics heavy, which is not really for me. from my impression, the residents at mt sinai seemed pretty happy and kinda more chill. mt sinai also seems to have good options for CAP training, with some partial hospital programs and adolescent outpatient clinics you could rotate at. and i like how mt sinai gives you a lot of elective time and more opportunities to explore your interests. also a fan of their emphasis on didactics/learning as a main goal.

meanwhile while nyu seemed much more structured from what i could tell with more call/less elective time, and overall more of a working and less of a learning program (some residents said they couldnt go to didactics sometimes bc they had to finish up work on the floors - so didactics is not really protected time...). meanwhile sinai specifically said they were the opposite with didactics always bein
Hi, you described your impressions of the two programs and your interests and goals really well, but it’s still hard to answer your question.
Based on what I picked up while being a med student in NYC, conversations with psychiatry residents at NYC programs and what I remember from my interviews, my overall impression of these two programs mirrors yours. Basically, NYU has a well established track of strong training with notable opportunities for working with underserved, severe mental illness, forensic population. Their child training is also much stronger than that of an average general psychiatry program. But it’s true that their residents are some of the most overworked and miserable (aside from the frankly malignant sweatshop programs). On the other hand, MtSinai residents are indeed some of the happiest, and their workload is on the lower end among the NYC programs (along with Einstein and MtSinai-Beth Israel); basically, NYU and MtSinai residents are on the opposite ends of the exhaustion spectrum. And... how should I put it... I was thoroughly impressed by MtSinai research track; they’re really putting a lot of money and effort to become *the* neuroscience/psychiatry research center in NYC. But I was not nearly as impressed by their clinical training, including the concerns about large parts of training being at the VA. Regarding child, there is only one child inpatient unit in the MtSinai system, and it’s at St. Luke’s. From what I remember (correct me if I’m wrong), MtSinai-main residents don’t routinely rotate there, but I don’t know if you could arrange an elective - something you could ask the program.

I wrote so much without really telling you anything useful. Bottom line is, at least from my point of view, your perception of the programs reflects the reality and is fairly nuanced, and I don’t know if any new pieces of information about the programs would be helpful in making your decision. Basically, you need to be honest with yourself and decide if you’re resilient and ambitious enough to go through the grind to get a stronger training and a broader experience at NYU, or if you would prefer to have more time and energy to figure out your own career path at MtSinai. Both are reasonable options but only you can decide which one is right for you. And just to make it clear, by saying I was not quite impressed by the clinical training at MtSinai I don’t mean that it’s poor, just not on par with the other top NYC programs and a far cry from their awesome research program. In any case, completing your residency at MtSinai will most definitely not close any doors for you.
g protected, even on off-service rotations, which i think is pretty awesome. in regards to sinai though, not sure about how i feel about doing 6 straight months full time at the VA 2nd year which mt sinai makes you do. they seem to be kinda va heavy in general which im not really that excited about...

thoughts anyone?

Hi all,

Took a look at this page since interview season is wrapping up, and noticed a few recent posts about Mount Sinai. Currently a resident at Mount Sinai Hospital, so thought I would try to provide some information about a few of the topics that came up. There are currently five psychiatry residencies affiliated with Mount Sinai Health System, although these residencies largely function independently. Residents do rotations at other sites if their 'home site' doesn't have a particular type of unit available. As an example, all residents rotate through the inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry unit on the Upper West Side. If the weather is nice and you're really not in a hurry, you can skip the shuttle and get there from Mount Sinai Hospital by taking a walk through Central Park.

Regarding PGY2, since our VA blocks are almost entirely outpatient, it is structured as a continuous six month experience to allow for longitudinal care at our VA-based mental health clinic in the Bronx. This is different from most other residencies, where VA time can be broken up because all of PGY1 and PGY2 is inpatient. Lastly, in terms of research, it's probably fair to say that the program takes a different approach from some other residencies. Residents here have time to pursue their own interests, but those interests can range from global health work to psychodynamic training at NYPSI. Unlike at other places, there is not a general expectation that every resident will engage in research. The other side of the coin is that if you are very serious about research, then the program is going to take that goal very seriously, and focus on helping you to get going on your own projects.

If anyone has additional questions, please feel free to message me. Best of luck to everyone.
 
Can anyone speak to the reputation of UVM and/or their combined child program? I know what I'm ranking #1 but my 2-4 are a bit up in the air right now. I'm between UVM combined, UMass combined, and Jeff for those spots. I really enjoyed peds as an MS3 and have done a few child psych rotations and I'm sold, so the combined programs seem like a great idea for continuity and not having to apply for fellowship and go through that process again. Jeff doesn't seem like it has that great of a child program, but I liked the folks there as well as the city.

Like many others, I loved umass but I'm not sold on the location. Boston's close though, as is providence, so this is a bit of wash for me. I just haven't heard any feedback on UVM from any of my mentors when I've asked.

I interviewed at: Umass, UVM, CHA, Tufts, UConn, IOL, Temple, Rutgers RWJ, Baystate, and Jeff

So far my list is:

1) CHA (set)
2) UMass Child
3) UVM Child
4) Jeff
5) UMass
6) UVM
7) Tufts
8) IOL Child
9) UConn
10) IOL
11) Temple
12) RWJ
13) Baystate

2-6 are kinda in flux and I haven't really thought about how to rank the ones below it to be honest. I've lived in CT and NJ before and they're not really for me, but I really liked the IOL and UConn so location puts them down a bit. RWJ was a really cool program, but location hurt it a bit for me. It also seemed to be the least academic. I'm also a 30 yo non white single dude, so that factors in a bit into location.

I had my best interview days at CHA, UVM, UMass, and Jeff so those are my preference. I love burlington, but it feels like a city better suited for someone in their early to mid 20's. UMass was a great program, but location wasn't the best but proximity to boston makes this reasonable. This is going to sound silly, but I'm ambivalent about living in boston since I did that for 5 years, but I loved CHA so much that I haven't thought twice about it. I love philly and jeff seemed really awesome. I also have family in that area which is nice. IOL child has the benefit of being a straight through program, so I'm debating ranking it higher, but they only have one spot it seems and I think it'd be better for me to apply into a better child program instead of doing the combined there to make life easier.

I guess I'm a bit all over the place.... any input would be great. I guess I'm mostly just a bit apprehensive that no one has anything to say about UVM.

Please and thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Can anyone speak to the reputation of UVM and/or their combined child program? I know what I'm ranking #1 but my 2-4 are a bit up in the air right now. I'm between UVM combined, UMass combined, and Jeff for those spots. I really enjoyed peds as an MS3 and have done a few child psych rotations and I'm sold, so the combined programs seem like a great idea for continuity and not having to apply for fellowship and go through that process again. Jeff doesn't seem like it has that great of a child program, but I liked the folks there as well as the city.

Like many others, I loved umass but I'm not sold on the location. Boston's close though, as is providence, so this is a bit of wash for me. I just haven't heard any feedback on UVM from any of my mentors when I've asked.

I interviewed at: Umass, UVM, CHA, Tufts, UConn, IOL, Temple, Rutgers RWJ, Baystate, and Jeff

So far my list is:

1) CHA (set)
2) UMass Child
3) UVM Child
4) Jeff
5) UMass
6) UVM
7) Tufts
8) IOL Child
9) UConn
10) IOL
11) Temple
12) RWJ
13) Baystate

2-6 are kinda in flux and I haven't really thought about how to rank the ones below it to be honest. I've lived in CT and NJ before and they're not really for me, but I really liked the IOL and UConn so location puts them down a bit. RWJ was a really cool program, but location hurt it a bit for me. It also seemed to be the least academic. I'm also a 30 yo non white single dude, so that factors in a bit into location.

I had my best interview days at CHA, UVM, UMass, and Jeff so those are my preference. I love burlington, but it feels like a city better suited for someone in their early to mid 20's. UMass was a great program, but location wasn't the best but proximity to boston makes this reasonable. This is going to sound silly, but I'm ambivalent about living in boston since I did that for 5 years, but I loved CHA so much that I haven't thought twice about it. I love philly and jeff seemed really awesome. I also have family in that area which is nice. IOL child has the benefit of being a straight through program, so I'm debating ranking it higher, but they only have one spot it seems and I think it'd be better for me to apply into a better child program instead of doing the combined there to make life easier.

I guess I'm a bit all over the place.... any input would be great. I guess I'm mostly just a bit apprehensive that no one has anything to say about UVM.

Please and thank you!

I really liked UVM when I interviewed 4 years ago (oh boy I am old) and absolutely LOVED burlington. One major factoring in me ranking UVM lower than other programs was the number of residents. Not sure if things are different now but back then they only had 3 adult residents and 2 child fellows? which meant that call was fairly heavy, especially if someone was out sick or on leave. Not sure if that has changed now. Personally I prefer bigger classes!

Also, I'm surprised that tufts is not higher on your list! Their hours are fairly chill and from what I've heard rotations are pretty cush in general. Lowkey talk to their pgy3s, rumour has it that a significant portion of their outpatients are actually kids/teens (which may or may not meet the ACGME reqs of seeing grown ups ;) but who cares if you prefer kids)... as someone who is interested in child this was a huge draw for me and definitely something that they don't openly advertise. I ranked them #2 when I applied and in some ways I wish I could have gone there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hi everyone!


I would really appreciate your opinion about the programs that invited me for interviews.

I’m an IMG, and I don’t know much about the reputation of the programs, whether they’re malignant or not and so on.

I’m aware that my choices should be made based on my impressions about the program during the interview. I also have preferences regarding geographical location.

However, I don’t know much about the reputation of the programs and I don’t want to end up in a bad one (since the programs also present a facade during the interview day). I’ve also looked up rankings, but I didn’t get much from them.

Anyway, I’d extremely appreciate your help on this matter! Thanks in advance!


How would you rank them solely based on REPUTATION/QUALITY?


The (psychiatry) programs are:

  • Zucker- Staten Island
  • NYMC at Westchester
  • NYMC Metropolitan
  • Nassau
  • St Luke’s hospital - Anderson campus
  • Penn state M. Hershey
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Reno - Nevada
  • University of Virginia
  • Rutgers NJ

And: Mount Sinai - Elmhurst (IF offered a pre-match, should I accept it?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Mayo>>> UVA>>>>> Rutgers>>>>>> Penn State Hershey and then the rest are unrankable*/would be considered bad. UNR actually has a highly ranked psychology program but i dont think this has any bearing on their psychiatry residency. if your goal is to match into a psychiatry residency program in the US and practice here, you would be advised to rank all of your options and pray you match at one of the mid-tier ones. It is still possible to become and excellent psychiatrist even if you go to a bad program. the onus is on you.

*by unrankable, I mean it unclear how to rank them, not that you shouldn't rank them. as stated above, if you dont have much choice it is best to rank all programs you interviewed at.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Mayo>>> UVA>>>>> Rutgers>>>>>> Penn State Hershey and then the rest are unrankable/would be considered bad. UNR actually has a highly ranked psychology program but i dont think this has any bearing on their psychiatry residency. if your goal is to match into a psychiatry residency program in the US and practice here, you would be advised to rank all of your options and pray you match at one of the mid-tier ones. It is still possible to become and excellent psychiatrist even if you go to a bad program. the onus is on you.

Why is UNR unrankable? All the residents seemed really happy there...
 
I'd like opinions on (the top) programs of my list. Thanks!

1. UC Davis - Sure this is #1, love the area, love the program, very well rounded, psychoanalytic opportunities, love love love. Better for moonlighting than some others.
2. Kaiser Oakland - brand new program, I've read some very negative things about Kaiser psych (mostly with info from YEARS ago?) but seems to have a lot of the resources needed to support my career and a lot of niche interests (LGBTQ health big focus, eating disorders, etc.) This is honestly the program I'm agonizing the most over, but I came away from this program having a very good opinion and now i'm just questioning it.
3. Mount Sinai Beth Israel NYC - not from NYC, like NYC quite a bit however, also a big LGBTQ health focus, interest in advocacy, psychoanalytic opportunities, seems very well rounded. Decent for moonlighting.
4. UC Riverside - Seems to support many of my professional goals, very good for lifestyle and moonlighting. Seems like everyone wants to live in LA/Orange County?
5. Samaritan Health - Corvallis, Oregon. Really liked the area, cute college town, it's a community program however. Debating on putting this 4 vs. lower depending on my fiance, who would prefer Norcal/NYC/Oregon over Southern California and Boston).
6. Boston University - Solid program, good psychoanalytic opportunities, MPH/Public Psychiatry track, cool city, COLD....
 
I'd like opinions on (the top) programs of my list. Thanks!

1. UC Davis - Sure this is #1, love the area, love the program, very well rounded, psychoanalytic opportunities, love love love. Better for moonlighting than some others.
2. Kaiser Oakland - brand new program, I've read some very negative things about Kaiser psych (mostly with info from YEARS ago?) but seems to have a lot of the resources needed to support my career and a lot of niche interests (LGBTQ health big focus, eating disorders, etc.) This is honestly the program I'm agonizing the most over, but I came away from this program having a very good opinion and now i'm just questioning it.
3. Mount Sinai Beth Israel NYC - not from NYC, like NYC quite a bit however, also a big LGBTQ health focus, interest in advocacy, psychoanalytic opportunities, seems very well rounded. Decent for moonlighting.
4. UC Riverside - Seems to support many of my professional goals, very good for lifestyle and moonlighting. Seems like everyone wants to live in LA/Orange County?
5. Samaritan Health - Corvallis, Oregon. Really liked the area, cute college town, it's a community program however. Debating on putting this 4 vs. lower depending on my fiance, who would prefer Norcal/NYC/Oregon over Southern California and Boston).
6. Boston University - Solid program, good psychoanalytic opportunities, MPH/Public Psychiatry track, cool city, COLD....
Yes, Kaiser is notorious for providing substandard psychiatric treatment because they really push for as much care to be done via email/phone as possible and so wait times for follow ups can be long. As a new program, it is not clear how things will pan out. However Kaiser Oakland has some really excellent psychiatrists and so there is the potential to receive good training, but it is of course heavily skewed towards preparing you to work at Kaiser, and the point of these Kaiser residencies is to create a pipeline of Kaiser psychiatrists. Several of the Kaiser psychiatrists precept ucsf medical students for their psychiatry clerkship, and others were previously on faculty at ucsf. Kaiser sites in more popular geographic areas, don't take any riff raff, they only well trained psychiatrists (this is probably not true in less desireable locales). If being in the Bay Area is important to you then and you don't have other options, and you think you would be potentially interested in working within a Kaiser/HMO type model of care in the future, then I think this would be a fine option (and pretty cushy too).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Mayo>>> UVA>>>>> Rutgers>>>>>> Penn State Hershey and then the rest are unrankable*/would be considered bad. UNR actually has a highly ranked psychology program but i dont think this has any bearing on their psychiatry residency. if your goal is to match into a psychiatry residency program in the US and practice here, you would be advised to rank all of your options and pray you match at one of the mid-tier ones. It is still possible to become and excellent psychiatrist even if you go to a bad program. the onus is on you.

*by unrankable, I mean it unclear how to rank them, not that you shouldn't rank them. as stated above, if you dont have much choice it is best to rank all programs you interviewed at.


Thank you very much for your answer! I really appreciate it! :) What about Zucker Staten Island? Not good?
 
What's the difference again re rutgers?
The Rwj one is the main one right? What's the other one called?
 
I would love to hear thoughts on these programs in terms of the quality of training offered and in terms of career opportunity in order to make a better informed rank order list.

In randomized order:
  • Mayo Clinic School of Grad Med Educ-MN
  • VA Greater LA Hlth Sys-CA [formerly UCLA-SFV now UCLA-GLAVA]
  • Case Western/Univ Hosps Cleveland Med Ctr-OH
  • Kaweah Delta Health Care District-CA
 
Last edited:
What's the difference again re rutgers?
The Rwj one is the main one right? What's the other one called?
There's RWJ and NJMS. I wouldn't consider one a main campus or anything. They're 2 separate institutions that happen to be part of 1 entity.

For Rutgers undergrad, New Brunswick is definitely the main campus and Newark a satellite.
 
Yes, Kaiser is notorious for providing substandard psychiatric treatment because they really push for as much care to be done via email/phone as possible and so wait times for follow ups can be long. As a new program, it is not clear how things will pan out. However Kaiser Oakland has some really excellent psychiatrists and so there is the potential to receive good training, but it is of course heavily skewed towards preparing you to work at Kaiser, and the point of these Kaiser residencies is to create a pipeline of Kaiser psychiatrists. Several of the Kaiser psychiatrists precept ucsf medical students for their psychiatry clerkship, and others were previously on faculty at ucsf. Kaiser sites in more popular geographic areas, don't take any riff raff, they only well trained psychiatrists (this is probably not true in less desireable locales). If being in the Bay Area is important to you then and you don't have other options, and you think you would be potentially interested in working within a Kaiser/HMO type model of care in the future, then I think this would be a fine option (and pretty cushy too).
Tons of my friends who have graduated in the past 3 years have taken jobs with kaiser. Apparently at the is place to go for Boston refugees trying to settle in cali. ;)

Don't know the specifics but apparently Kaiser residents are treated VERY WELL since the entire residency (as mentioned above) is geared towards creating kaiser physicians, thus incentive to be nice to residents. I think as of this year there is no call? (someone might want to verify this) which is a HUGE plus.

Honestly I don't know too much about it but it sounds like a fast track to a golden ticket career. If I could start the residency process again and wanted to go to the west coast, I would probably rank Kaiser near the top of my list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Tons of my friends who have graduated in the past 3 years have taken jobs with kaiser. Apparently at the is place to go for Boston refugees trying to settle in cali. ;)

Don't know the specifics but apparently Kaiser residents are treated VERY WELL since the entire residency (as mentioned above) is geared towards creating kaiser physicians, thus incentive to be nice to residents. I think as of this year there is no call? (someone might want to verify this) which is a HUGE plus.

Honestly I don't know too much about it but it sounds like a fast track to a golden ticket career. If I could start the residency process again and wanted to go to the west coast, I would probably rank Kaiser near the top of my list.
Hmm, I don't know about golden ticket. I've always heard that Kaiser is rather productivity oriented. Not sure if it's "15 minute med checks" bad but you're probably not doing therapy with your patients, if that matters to you.
 
Hmm, I don't know about golden ticket. I've always heard that Kaiser is rather productivity oriented. Not sure if it's "15 minute med checks" bad but you're probably not doing therapy with your patients, if that matters to you.

I've heard this as well from current physicians in the Kaiser system. They are really good at what they do -- which is providing affordable services for the community -- and so their public health and primary care is top notch. This may come at the expense of mental health care. I've also heard Kaiser is very metrics oriented and there's incentives for productivity. But please feel free to dispute because I don't have direct experience with it, it's just what I heard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Rank list submitted

1 Dartmouth
2 Harvard South Shore
3 Baylor
4 UT Austin
5 Mayo
6 Utah
7 LSU New Orleans
8 UF
9 Home program
10 LSU Shreveport

Let's get this bread
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Does anyone have thoughts on MGH vs BWH? I know a lot of people earlier on the thread think BWH is going more biological which may or may not be an issue for me. My interest is in treating the psychiatric comorbidies in patients who are trans; I'm also interested in C&A and I hope to combine both of these in my future academic practice. I really like Boston and don't mind spending the money to live there for training. Here are my pro/cons/thoughts:

MGH
+ highly ranked, obviously well regarded
+ I got along really well with the residents (but maybe everyone does; they seem to have a very polished recruitment strategy)
+ Lots of trans attention/programs
+ Great training that prepares you for everything
- The call seems VERY heavy. Work/life balance almost looks impossible. It might be hard to take advantage of all the trans programs they offer
- People always talk about it being a malignant program in the past... although I didn't get that vibe at my interview. Albeit, I am not from the east coast so I probably have less insight into this than most.


BWH
+ Got along with residents, although less so than MGH (but again, MGH was very polished/enthusiastic)
+ Call seemed way more reasonable
+ Half-day a week devoted to personal interests within psychiatry could help me develop a niche
+ Still a Harvard program
- Fewer trans programs, although extra time to develop this interest elsewhere
- Not as highly regarded as MGH is my understanding


Otherwise my rank list is pretty set. These are #1/#2, just not sure what order...
 
In Boston, the Brigham will forever be in the shadow of Man's Greatest Hospital. It's just the trash talk that accompanies things. No one in their right mind is going to say that one is worse than the other. It's part running joke part chip on the shoulder.

There's also tons of collaboration across the board for those programs so I'm sure you could get into a clinic that wasn't directly affiliated with BWH since it's all harvard.
 
- Fewer trans programs, although extra time to develop this interest elsewhere

There's also tons of collaboration across the board for those programs so I'm sure you could get into a clinic that wasn't directly affiliated with BWH since it's all harvard.

I agree. At (nearly) every harvard-affiliated program, the PDs talked about how being in the harvard med system gives you access to pretty much all the harvard-related things. I'm sure if you're interested in trans health, you can arrange electives at Fenway Health or other specialty clinics.

Based on the plus/minus you've written, I guess the question to answer is: would it be worth it for you to give up some of the work/life balance for the MGH reputation?
 
Just popping in to say that I really don't think there's any difference in "prestige" between MGH and BWH, either locally or nationally. Both are considered "top hospitals" in the country, and I really wouldn't base your decision on a negligible difference in reputation. Go with the program you like better than gives you the opportunities you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top