Do people usually put what they learned in the activities description, how it helped you grow etc etc?
Or just a straight up explanation of what it was and a list of what you did
There are two schools of thought on this. Some just straight up explain/list what they did. Others (including me), believe that you are more personable and your motivations are better understood if you also say what you learned and how it helped you grow.
Question regarding which to designate as my most meaningful experiences: is it too much to use 3 experiences that were all clinically focused? One is my leadership involvement in a student organization that sets up shadowing in rural communities for prehealth students, and I talk about my growth through leadership as well as the shadowing insights in rural communities. Another is a medical mission trip I went on, and I use the most meaningful experience description to talk about the teamwork and problem solving skills I developed as a result, rather than focus on the patient interactions. The third is my clinical shadowing because I wanted to talk more about the insights I gained through domestic shadowing (my PS is more about experiences abroad so my adviser suggested that I use my works & activities to demonstrate I have an understanding of medicine in the States). I'm using this last description more to talk about the mentorships I've had with doctors, how they have inspired me, and how that has furthered my understanding of the physician lifestyle and confirmed my enjoyment in it...instead of talking about patient interactions? Is this appropriate at all?
Do these seem redundant at all? I do have other experiences I could use as most meaningful but these I feel most strongly about and build up my reasons for pursuing medicine.
Thanks!! I'd really appreciate any input on this!
I think it's always good to be multi-dimensional and show a variety of most meaningful experiences if possible. Like 1 clinical, 1 non-medical community service, 1 research (or artistic/sports or something else). But if all 3 of yours truly were clinically related, then it is what it is. Go for it.
Should I designate whether my contacts have MD, PhD, MS, or other titles after their last names?
Thank you for all your help!!!
If you have the characters, that's fine. It probably won't matter either way.
I recently had a provisional patent approved. I worked on the patent with my supervisor at work and am thinking about how to include this in my work experiences section. Any advice on whether to put it as a separate activity or group it together with my work experience?
And if separate activity, any advice on experience type? I'm debating between artistic endeavors, honors/awards/recognitions, or other.
I also published a book with my supervisor, and the same question about whether to group with work experience or separate activity. And if separate, debating artistic endeavors or publications. I'm leaning towards grouping together though..
Thanks!! =]
I would describe all this within the 1 work experience entry. Perhaps you could make it one of your most meaningful ones.
I'm a co-author of a research paper about PAD. The abstract was published, but the manuscript was rejected (we were told to make revisions, and then re-submit for publication). Do I list it on its own under "Publication" or group it with my Work/Activities slot on my whole research internship?
Add it to the Research description.
Hi everyone, I'm not sure if this has been addressed somewhere, but I was unable to find an answer to my question of what do I put as my end date if I am still involved in the activity?
Amcas manual states:
Experience Dates
Include the start and end dates for each experience. Some Experience Types, such as Awards, Presentations/Posters and Publications, require only one date. Your start date must be no later than the current month and your latest end date must be no later than the August of the current application cycle.
Should I put August 2014? There is no option to leave it blank, and I wasn't sure what to put.
Thanks!
If you anticipate ending right before school starts, then yes August 2014 is fine. Put whatever date you think you will stop. Not sure why this is confusing? An end date means "what date will you end this activity"
1) If you were listed as an author on a poster presented at a national conference (presented by someone else) what should you list for the hours? Can I include university-wide conferences in the same entry or are such conferences negligible?
2) Have we reached a consensus about the multiple conferences issue in one slot? What do we to put for the hours?
3) How many hours do we put for publications?
If you did not present, then I don't think you can list this as a presentation (i.e 0 hours). Simply describe the publication in a Publication entry (or within the Research description). University wide conferences are fine to list separately (or also within the Reseach description, if they were minor), if you actually did something for the conference (organized or presented).
I had some questions about my works and activities! I hope I'm not too late!
1. Junior year I worked for two quarters at my campus's dining hall. Is it worthwhile to mention it? (I have the space).
2. My clinical volunteering was 2 years ago and the clinic had a huge change of staff, so I'm worried my coordinator doesn't work there anymore (also it was a really small free clinic and they only kept paper records of us being there so I don't know if that stuff is still even there...) Who should I list as the contact?
3. I'm still a little confused...so posters go under posters/presentations and same with talks, not under conferences attended even if they were national conferences right? What goes under conferences attended then...
4. I already have 4-5 years of research, 4 posters, and 1 pub but I also did a year of senior design for engineering and I feel like I learned a lot, so how do med schools feel about listing senior design projects and such (I used the search function but found all kinds of different answers for specific cases...)
5. Latin honors is probably useless to list, right?
1. Sure
2. List your old coordinator and his/her phone number as you knew it at the clinic. In the off chance that he/she is gone and someone else picks up and they cannot find the records, that's fine, you did the best you could. A med school will contact you if they have a problem verifying something they really, really want to verify.
3.Perhaps conferences you attended but did not submit or present anything? If you presented, I would describe it under poster/presentations.
4.Was it a required project in an engineering class? In that case, I would leave it off. If it was an independent project, then you can include it here as an EC
5. Not useless, list it under Awards/Honors (especially if it was magna or summa)