It's a Rolex Sub in the original image you posted. Clear as day. Bond has worn the Sub in the past.
http://www.007museum.com/bondwatches.htm
rekt
lol jk
It's a Rolex Sub in the original image you posted. Clear as day. Bond has worn the Sub in the past.
http://www.007museum.com/bondwatches.htm
It's a Rolex Sub in the original image you posted. Clear as day. Bond has worn the Sub in the past.
http://www.007museum.com/bondwatches.htm
Dude, give it up. You were wrong.yeah this picture looks like it might be a planet ocean
edit: looks like they were two different images. so techinically we're both right since I think the second one is a planet ocean.
edit 2: did they photoshop the second picture to get rid of the submariner and put a planet ocean it in?!
Dude, give it up. You were wrong.
Dude, give it up. You were wrong.
Sadly, yes.oh hey, we're still doing this?
GWDS knows what he's talking about. Sorry that you never learned the basic conventions and that there's nothing but tradition in the "why" but that's just how it is. Blutchers are casual, metal bands are casual, no ******* notch lapels on a tuxedo (that one is unforgivable). Why is a handshake the accepted standard for a greeting and goodbye? It just is.
And yes, it might be faux paus mostly to old dudes in their 60s drinking cognac....but who's interviewing you?
That's a stretch. Maybe we should all start wearing 34mm diameter watches as they were once considered the ideal size? Times are changing, a 40mm watch was considered humongous, now its completely normal. Similarly, dressed down watches are becoming more accepted in formal occasions. I wouldn't go so far as to wear a nato strap at an interview, though.
I've never heard of an ideal size. That doesn't make sense since wrist sizes are so variable; as far as I know you just don't want an overly bulky watch. I could be wrong though.
well back then 40mm was considered bulky; now it is considered standard size for the majority of male wrists.
Regardless, people who think traditional standards of professional dress are important are not uncommon and will likely be a part of the pool of people who interview residency applicants, and most people can learn these simple rules and follow them. It is highly unlikely that not following them will really hurt you, but considering the small details people on SDN get bent out of shape for, this is something easily done to present "the best version of yourself".
I don't disagree. Actually, if I did choose to wear a watch to an interview I would probably put it on a brown leather faux-croc strap. I just take offense with certain people claiming they are unequivocally wrong about fashion style norms that are constantly in flux and evolving. I do think that a metal bracelet on a watch for a dress occasion is a super minute detail that no one would really care about. In addition, certain watches that are known for their versatility (think: rolex submariner, omega speedmaster professional) come in metal bracelets as a default, and I don't think anyone would look at those watches and be critical about the fact that they aren't on leather.
yup.
so this means that my sparkly pink shoes and gym pants at work right now are totally fashion forward and appropriate....RIGHT?!?!?!
well..only if you are a unique and special snowflake
You actually are wrong. If you look at all mens watches made before and during the Swiss Golden Age they are all almost under 38mm; the only ones that are over are sport/tool watches that had a specific purpose such as the Submariner. I have a 1969 Omega Constellation Calibre 751 and it measures just under 36mm. By today's standards it is 'small' but I think it looks a lot more elegant and proper than any 40mm+ being produced today and most watch aficionados would agree. There is a reason things are timeless and classic and unfortunately the current trend with larger mens watches is not something that I think is here to stay. A larger watch does not mean it is better even if you think it fits your wrist better (I have extremely large hands and still prefer classic watch sizes) So that is fine if you choose to wear large watches but just don't think that it is better for you than a smaller classic watchI've never heard of an ideal size. That doesn't make sense since wrist sizes are so variable; as far as I know you just don't want an overly bulky watch. I could be wrong though.
You actually are wrong. If you look at all mens watches made before and during the Swiss Golden Age they are all almost under 38mm; the only ones that are over are sport/tool watches that had a specific purpose such as the Submariner. I have a 1969 Omega Constellation Calibre 751 and it measures just under 36mm. By today's standards it is 'small' but I think it looks a lot more elegant and proper than any 40mm+ being produced today and most watch aficionados would agree. There is a reason things are timeless and classic and unfortunately the current trend with larger mens watches is not something that I think is here to stay. A larger watch does not mean it is better even if you think it fits your wrist better (I have extremely large hands and still prefer classic watch sizes) So that is fine if you choose to wear large watches but just don't think that it is better for you than a smaller classic watch
Like Bill Clinton did while he was in office.I was being sarcastic. Obviously, it looks great. It's not like he's wearing a Timex Ironman watch.
Like Bill Clinton did while he was in office.
im the boss snowflake, i do what i want
What are you talking about? He's not wrong. The first photo is absolutely and clearly to someone familiar with the watch in question a submariner. Daniel Craig owns and wears a Rolex submariner often. I don't think he has the same deal that Brosnan had, who always wore an Omega. Though they are used in the films and he obviously does print ads for them.Dude, give it up. You were wrong.
Here he is while filming Skyfall in the Omega Aqua Terra. It's a sharp watch. I love blue dials.
Oh I see. Yea, I would definitely say that if you wanted to be a true watch-snob I would say that there is definitely a rule to keep it under 40mm especially with formal dress, but lets be real most people you run into will not know the difference. But the one person that you do run into and they notice that you understand what a proper watch is, they might become your new best friend. When I was in my sophomore year of undergrad I was wearing my Omega and a random Dr. in the room pulled me aside and told me he noticed my high-dome crystal and we started talking about watches. Turns out he was the department head, and opened up a lot of new opportunities for me around the hospital. I still stay in contact with him and he will definitely be a useful reference in my future. Sorry for the tangent, just trying to point out that people do notice, and most of the time those that will notice, especially in the medical field/ hospital setting, seem to be those in important places. And the same goes with the rest of this thread, sure you can get away with not doing what is 'traditional/proper' and people will not create a fuss or penalize you, but if you take the extra time to educate yourself and show this, you will often be rewarded.I think you misinterpreted me. I dislike larger watches as well; I just haven't heard of an ideal size by formal convention; ie larger watches are more or less appropriate for an interview.
Finally somebody who knows what they are talking about.What are you talking about? He's not wrong. The first photo is absolutely and clearly to someone familiar with the watch in question a submariner. Daniel Craig owns and wears a Rolex submariner often.
Finally somebody who knows what they are talking about.
If anybody gives me guff on my submariner wristwatch or my metal band, I tell them I am a professional scuba diver (truth) and they can go stuff it in their octopus.
Hahahaha!
BTW, on my ipad, the Sub looks 'shopped. But Craig definitely wears a sub when he's off the clock, in addition to many others I'm sure.
yeah i figured one of them was shopped. doesn't make sense for them to be identical pictures with different watches
Why are your PM's broken
i'm not sure what you mean. my private messages?
Yes. You are un-PMable
of course, because a leather band on a watch isn't a no-no at allSee that to me is more of a glaring no-no than a leather band on a watch, but wtf do I know anyway
See that to me is more of a glaring no-no than a leather band on a watch, but wtf do I know anyway
lmao who is this imbecile wearing a metal band watch with a suitHere he is while filming Skyfall in the Omega Aqua Terra. It's a sharp watch. I love blue dials.
Wait a second. Hold the phone!
He is wearing a suit and a metal bracelet watch.
And, he looks great.
You're right. He could wear this watch and still make it look good.to be fair, daneil craig would look great even if he wore a flavor-flav clock on his wrist
this might be a really stupid question...but
for men: what is business casual? one of my program has a pre-interview dinner and they specifically said the dress code was business casual.
fair enough