- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 172
Last edited:
I'm already 3 days ahead while other students are complaining of a lack of sleep and not understanding info. Haha
My school doesn't have AOA or ranking. Lol. But yeah, technically I won't be skipping lectures but just reading through the "reader" which is basically a more coherent version of the lecture in written format. I can get through it in half the time of a lecture with probably triple the understanding. It's just the idea of skipping lectures that has felt foreign to me, but I'll get used to it. I only know one other person at my school that skips lecture, so we're sort of like black swans. Haha
Pre-COVID, anywhere from50-90% of my students skipped lectures.MS1 here in my second block. I feel like I'm wasting my time in lecture and not doing enough reviews/ board prep/ active learning. My school is a bit unique in that they create "readers" for each lecture which are basically lectures in a readable form and are far more better than the lectures as the lecturers tend to gloss over/ assume we know key details. I can also read these readers in half the time and with far more understanding than listening to the watered down lectures where I constantly have to google things since the lecturers aren't explaining things in sufficient detail ( I don't blame them as there's only so much you can cover in an hour). Therefore, I feel that by just reading these readers, I can average significantly more sleep per week and get more time to do reviews and active learning which is the name of the game in med school.
Overall, does anyone else skip lectures and how is it going for you? I'm simply afraid of skipping lectures as it feels blasphemous and contrary to everything I have done in the past. I did very well in our first block. However, the efficiency wasn't great and I barely cut it in terms of the number of reviews and so I definitely need to change something. This approach would seem to yield the most returns out of anything that I can think of.
@slowthai I feel that we have similar pedagogical philosophies, so if I could hear from you that would be great as well.
Skipped all lectures possible and just ignored the mandatory ones while sitting in the lecture hall. Zero regret. Would recommend the free time and control over your schedule ASAP.
Don't be the person in your class who figures this out like 6 months in. There will be people like that and it is so confusing and sad.
Sit in lecture hall with headphones on and do work. There is zero reason to listen to lectures at 1x speed with no ability to pause or rewind (aka live lecture) even if you need to be outside your house to focus.But sitting in lecture helps me focus! I can’t concentrate at home! I get distracted!
Go away.
M4 ~250Just out of curiosity what year are you and if you don't mind sharing, your Step 1 score?
Don't take advice of someone because they did pretty well and are further along in training. Analyze the advice for your situation, man.Yup, I'm skipping lectures.
Not all students like the TBL format. I'm not crazy about the format either.Lectures should be pre-recorded, and "class time" should be spent on active learning, assessment questions, and review, but I think @Goro and I are in the minority as compared to our colleagues with a different mindset.
If only more of my faculties share your view.Pre-COVID, anywhere from50-90% of my students skipped lectures.
It's OK, you're an adult learner and know best about what is your ideal learning style. You're not an empty vessel awaiting your brain to be filled with knowledge by the "sage on the stage".
Active learning >>>>>> passive learning.
Not all students like the TBL format. I'm not crazy about the format either.
I do this! Not 100% of the time, though.TBL is definitely one of the "trendy" curriculum delivery models. It has some merit, but I am more in favor of very short case presentations with multiple assessment/board questions to follow before moving onto the next case.
Should students attend lectures in a unit they hope to specialize in? Neuro, MSK, Derm specifically as they are competitive. Are there advantages for networking? Disadvantages as in not showing interest?
No. If you want to network, you do research with a physician in your department of interest.
Interestingly, about 10-15% of my students are hard core lecture attenders. They need the live verbal/visual/aural first pass at the material. It's unfortunate that current TBL style modes actually select against these types of learners.The issue with this is that some professors give oral cues about what’s most likely going to show up on exams from their lectures and what definitely isn’t. At least that’s how it is at my school.
I watch lectures at 2x speed just to note what the professor says is and isn’t “important” (i.e., to gauge what is or isn’t going to be on the next exam). While it takes time to watch the lectures, it would take me even more time to try to futilely memorize the random lists and tables that the instructors say in lecture are “only there for your information” or are “not worth worrying too much about.”
The issue with this is that some professors give oral cues about what’s most likely going to show up on exams from their lectures and what definitely isn’t. At least that’s how it is at my school.
I watch lectures at 2x speed just to note what the professor says is and isn’t “important” (i.e., to gauge what is or isn’t going to be on the next exam). While it takes time to watch the lectures, it would take me even more time to try to futilely memorize the random lists and tables that the instructors say in lecture are “only there for your information” or are “not worth worrying too much about.”
The issue with this is that some professors give oral cues about what’s most likely going to show up on exams from their lectures and what definitely isn’t. At least that’s how it is at my school.
I watch lectures at 2x speed just to note what the professor says is and isn’t “important” (i.e., to gauge what is or isn’t going to be on the next exam). While it takes time to watch the lectures, it would take me even more time to try to futilely memorize the random lists and tables that the instructors say in lecture are “only there for your information” or are “not worth worrying too much about.”
The issue with this is that some professors give oral cues about what’s most likely going to show up on exams from their lectures and what definitely isn’t. At least that’s how it is at my school.
I watch lectures at 2x speed just to note what the professor says is and isn’t “important” (i.e., to gauge what is or isn’t going to be on the next exam). While it takes time to watch the lectures, it would take me even more time to try to futilely memorize the random lists and tables that the instructors say in lecture are “only there for your information” or are “not worth worrying too much about.”
Yup. That's exactly what I do, go through the readings and then quickly go through the slides afterwards. Not sure why reading is a lot faster until @sloh 's comment above. Also, I hardly have to take any notes with our school's assigned reading which saves a dramatic amount of time. Overall, I've seen significantly more free time, had time for research, been able to review more, incorporate board material more efficiently, and have managed to get 7-8 hours to sleep per day all the while seeing all of my classmates constantly moan about how "hard" this block is.
This, very much.Good to hear. If you guys dive into the cognitive science and learning literature, learning styles is also a myth.
For those of you who don’t watch lecture and don’t take notes, how do you learn and connect the information? I’ve tried not taking notes and only using Anki, but I completely lose sight of how everything fits together. But when I do take notes, it takes way too long and feels like a waste of time...
For those of you who don’t watch lecture and don’t take notes, how do you learn and connect the information? I’ve tried not taking notes and only using Anki, but I completely lose sight of how everything fits together. But when I do take notes, it takes way too long and feels like a waste of time...
What did you use for practice questions? I agree practice questions are a great way to go, but my school doesn’t really provide any. I thought about getting a step qbank just so I would have something to practice with, but not sure if that’s a good idea so early on (I’m an MS1).I haven't taken a note since I started (MS3 now), practice questions and anki is the answer. Do 15000+ practice questions, see which are your weakest subjects then do even more in those areas while keeping up with anki.
If you come across a question you have no idea on, answer it and then go through it properly to figure out why that's the answer.
What did you use for practice questions? I agree practice questions are a great way to go, but my school doesn’t really provide any. I thought about getting a step qbank just so I would have something to practice with, but not sure if that’s a good idea so early on (I’m an MS1).
The preclinical review books: BRS, Guyton, Pretest, Thieme's, Lippincott, and the BnB qs.
Also rx is good ime.
The preclinical review books: BRS, Guyton, Pretest, Thieme's, Lippincott, and the BnB qs.
Also rx is good ime.
I mean, I guess it depends on the curriculum. If they're getting path as they go then it wouldn't be a bad idea. But if they get it second year, I would hold off until then.
Thanks, I’ll check these out! My school is 1.5y and does integrate path with the 1st sem stuff
The preclinical review books: BRS, Guyton, Pretest, Thieme's, Lippincott, and the BnB qs.
would you recommend doing those if school TAs offer review questions? system based curriculum. I’ve tried some of the BnB questions but they often include stuff we haven’t covered yet (pharm, labs, other systems)
would you recommend doing those if school TAs offer review questions? system based curriculum. I’ve tried some of the BnB questions but they often include stuff we haven’t covered yet (pharm, labs, other systems)