TEXAS Med Schools Entering Class *2005* Applicant Thread part 01

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
MadameLULU said:
I know UTSW does for sure and I think the other ones have informal gatherings

Perhaps Lane or Seabass could shed some light on this....
we have a welcome weekend last weekend of March put on by the current first years who will be at the events.

Friday they have a BBQ thing for incoming and family/SOs/etc and you get your first UTH Med shirts. 😉 then it goes to another family location (what is that Chuckee Cheese place for adults?) then they have a bar with drink special for those who want to go party it up together.

saturday they have discounted tix to Astro World which some go to but others use it as a weekend to meet possible roommates and look for somewhere to live. I think about 70% of the incoming class came last year.
 
SFAJess said:
Hey there folks! I just now checked my UTSW status page and it says "Interviewed" and my grades are updated according to the fall transcripts I sent to TMDSAS. Hmm....wonder what it all could mean. BTW, ranked them #4 (wanted higher, but won't work out for fiance's job if we live in Dallas).
Pink, what's your's take on this one? Do you know if everybody's status has been changed back to "interviewed" now?
 
wdarli said:
I love the fact that I can be busy at work all morning long and check this forum and discover that I have 3 pages to catch up on.....you guys are great! Happy Wednesday 😍

I know! Me too...I leave for class for a couple hours and there are 3 pages of posts to catch up on. Even as I'm reading, a new page just pops up. 😛
 
Dr.Quiet said:
Pink, what's your's take on this one? Do you know if everybody's status has been changed back to "interviewed" now?

Haha so I am the expert paranoid now? Well, since mine changed back to interviewed, as well as others, I guess that they all changed back (just extrapolating). Anyhow, someone commented that I was assuming that TMDSAS was that efficient, but i am not assuming. If they have our updated grades, they only could have gotten them from TMDSAS. So, it stands to reason, NO MATTER WHAT, that either they sent all the people files to UTSW or only those people that were on the UTSW accepted list (as there would be no reason to update only those that were rejected from UTSW). Thus, it cannot be a negative thing that this happened, it is either positive or meaningless! I think we need to find some people that don't have new grades reflected in their transcripts!
 
I have no grade/gpa updates, no nothing updates. (graduated may '04) Also tmdsas has still not validated me. =( However yesterday my utsw status page did say application received and is now back at interviewed. So if tmdsas did send utsw something, I have no idea what it would be. (for me at least)

Hope that adds to the paranoia! =D
 
So whats up with the Tech status page??







Just kidding :meanie:

-tx
 
meads said:
I have no grade/gpa updates, no nothing updates. (graduated may '04) Also tmdsas has still not validated me. =( However yesterday my utsw status page did say application received and is now back at interviewed. So if tmdsas did send utsw something, I have no idea what it would be. (for me at least)

Hope that adds to the paranoia! =D
Meads, Did u rank UTSW as your #1 choice? Also wondering if you would consider your application above avg., avg., or below avg. compared to UTSW averages (32.5 MCAT and 3.75 GPA). I totally understand if you don't want to comment on these questions.
 
::Seabass:: said:
Friday they have a BBQ thing for incoming and family/SOs/etc and you get your first UTH Med shirts. then it goes to another family location (what is that Chuckee Cheese place for adults?) then they have a bar with drink special for those who want to go party it up together.

Are you referring to Dave & Busters? Or maybe Jillians?
 
EvoDevo said:
FYI, my roommate just called and stated that I rec'd a UTMB letter. Since I didn't interview there..... :meanie:

Back to your regularly scheduled paranoia. 😀


Yep, me too. It's a nicely put rejection I must say.I didn't even think they would bother. Some others that I have rec'd from out of state are sooo rude.

Anyways, back to work. I'm working like crazy this week to make the time go by. I'm picking up lots of shifts next week after the match too. I figure if it's bad news, no use sitting around being depressed for longer than a day. But a little kid said something to me today that lifted me up. It was their 'wisdom for the day' phrase at school: "Let your hopes keep you joyful." Dangit, I'm trying!!🙂 🙂
 
meads said:
I have no grade/gpa updates, no nothing updates. (graduated may '04) Also tmdsas has still not validated me. =( However yesterday my utsw status page did say application received and is now back at interviewed. So if tmdsas did send utsw something, I have no idea what it would be. (for me at least)

Hope that adds to the paranoia! =D


Meads, I am just as worried/paranoid as you! im not validated by TMDSAS yet, i graduated in may 04 and my status page (utsw) said application received yesterday as well (its now back to interviewed). I havent sent TMDSAS anything new since last july, so i have no idea what 'application' they could have 'received'. Hopefully this could only be good news for us!

also, do yall think that the school found out about everyone checking the website and changed everyone's statuses back to 'interviewed' to prevent leaking information about the match?
 
I hear that the TCOM website changed it's status update today! What could it mean????? :scared:



















this is a joke. Do not go and check.
 
Coronada said:
also, do yall think that the school found out about everyone checking the website and changed everyone's statuses back to 'interviewed' to prevent leaking information about the match?

Could be...I had an Asst Dean of Admissions for a school I interviewed at specifically say that they watch SDN, specifically for comments about their school. They claim they monitor it as a way to improve the process for future interviewees! 🙄
 
Coronada said:
Meads, I am just as worried/paranoid as you! im not validated by TMDSAS yet, i graduated in may 04 and my status page (utsw) said application received yesterday as well (its now back to interviewed). I havent sent TMDSAS anything new since last july, so i have no idea what 'application' they could have 'received'. Hopefully this could only be good news for us!

also, do yall think that the school found out about everyone checking the website and changed everyone's statuses back to 'interviewed' to prevent leaking information about the match?
I have a feeling that UTSW "fixed" the status gaffe after receiving phone calls from SDNers. Coronada, how does your stats compare to UTSW avg., if u don't mind answering. Ofcourse, don't answer if u don't want to.
 
RangerD said:
Are you referring to Dave & Busters? Or maybe Jillians?
ah ha! dave & busters. but who knows what the MS1s have planned for this year.

I'm guessing the plans won't change too much.
 
EvoDevo said:
I hear that the TCOM website changed it's status update today! What could it mean????? :scared:



















this is a joke. Do not go and check.


:laugh:
 
Coronada said:
Meads, I am just as worried/paranoid as you! im not validated by TMDSAS yet, i graduated in may 04 and my status page (utsw) said application received yesterday as well (its now back to interviewed). I havent sent TMDSAS anything new since last july, so i have no idea what 'application' they could have 'received'. Hopefully this could only be good news for us!

also, do yall think that the school found out about everyone checking the website and changed everyone's statuses back to 'interviewed' to prevent leaking information about the match?

I stand by my assertion that I made earlier. NO mater what, it can only be a good thing or a neutral thing. Obviously since ya'll didn't have any updated material, TMDSAS sent over the applications they had on file as of some day (we'll say yesterday) and UTSW updated to say application recieved. It seems to me that logically this would imply acceptance. The reason I say this is that some people didn't have their information sent over it appears (as some people claim to have said interviewed the whole time and never had any GPA updates). Now, obviously I am not claiming to know anything, but being the philosophy major I am and fairly good at deductive reasoning (I didn't mean to sound pretentious there, really!) It seems to me that knowing the conditions that a) only some applicants had their new files sent to UTSW from TMDSAS b) this had nothing to do with updating new GPA information c) There is certainly no reason they would have sent updated app packets of only those applicants rejected (to the neglect of those accepted) d) it appears to be about half and half of those whose changed and those whose didn't (thus correlating well to the 60% UTSW acceptance rate) and e) The school and TMDSAS already have the match results and are thus getting their class records formalized/completed that conditions a) - e) seem to imply an acceptance. Of course, this is just conjecture and may be off base. The basic principle that is certainly not off though is that if you were updated to say applicatin recieved that you have been rejected, this is proven wrong by the deductive proofs just mentioned.
 
My UTSW status is back to "interviewed."

I don't think assuming the recent activity was a positive sign is valid though. People are setting themselves up for disapointment and messing with others that potentially will match but have yet to see a status change.
 
EvoDevo said:
FYI, my roommate just called and stated that I rec'd a UTMB letter. Since I didn't interview there..... :meanie:

Back to your regularly scheduled paranoia. 😀

I got a panicked phone call from my mother an hour ago about my TAMU rejection that showed up at the house (I didn't fill out their secondary). She somehow took it to mean that I had been roundly rejected by every school I applied to.
I think my parents are more stressed about this whole thing than I am!

I am quite stressed though.
 
::Seabass:: said:
ah ha! dave & busters. but who knows what the MS1s have planned for this year.

I'm guessing the plans won't change too much.

I didn't go to the meeting, but form what I hear, we aren't going to do as much this year for Welcome Weekend as last year. I think we are cuting out the Astroworld thing for sure, and I'm not sure what else. Kind of sucks...I had a blast last year. I guess we're just going to have to put all of our effort into Retreat 👍
 
I think it's so funny how we all take turns being either paranoid, on the verge of vomiting, or trying to calm someone else down. :laugh:
 
JDAD said:
My UTSW status is back to "interviewed."

I don't think assuming the recent activity was a positive sign is valid though. People are setting themselves up for disapointment and messing with others that potentially will match but have yet to see a status change.

Now JDAD, see I was careful to only offer my personal deduction on the matter. I simply gave a scenario that would fit a positive deduction. You are correct that we should not assume it to be a positive thing. We can, however, be 100% sure it is not a negative thing!
 
Alexander Pink said:
I stand by my assertion that I made earlier. NO mater what, it can only be a good thing or a neutral thing. Obviously since ya'll didn't have any updated material, TMDSAS sent over the applications they had on file as of some day (we'll say yesterday) and UTSW updated to say application recieved. It seems to me that logically this would imply acceptance. The reason I say this is that some people didn't have their information sent over it appears (as some people claim to have said interviewed the whole time and never had any GPA updates). Now, obviously I am not claiming to know anything, but being the philosophy major I am and fairly good at deductive reasoning (I didn't mean to sound pretentious there, really!) It seems to me that knowing the conditions that a) only some applicants had their new files sent to UTSW from TMDSAS b) this had nothing to do with updating new GPA information c) There is certainly no reason they would have sent updated app packets of only those applicants rejected (to the neglect of those accepted) d) it appears to be about half and half of those whose changed and those whose didn't (thus correlating well to the 60% UTSW acceptance rate) and e) The school and TMDSAS already have the match results and are thus getting their class records formalized/completed that conditions a) - e) seem to imply an acceptance. Of course, this is just conjecture and may be off base. The basic principle that is certainly not off though is that if you were updated to say applicatin recieved that you have been rejected, this is proven wrong by the deductive proofs just mentioned.


You didn't prove anything wrong. You simply said that you don't think they would have sent out information regarding rejected applicants.

Maybe those profiles which were updated are those who did not match and their grades are updated because UTSW no has to compile a ranked alternate list?

We really have no idea.
 
JDAD said:
You didn't prove anything wrong. You simply said that you don't think they would have sent out information regarding rejected applicants.

Maybe those profiles which were updated are those who did not match and their grades are updated because UTSW no has to compile a ranked alternate list?

We really have no idea.

Again, that could be the case. But, it seems at the least supremely unlikely that they would send only the files of those that were rejected while not sending those accepted. This is in addition to the fact that they updated some files that included no GPA changes. I feel my logic is sound and stand by my carefully worded conclusion. It is at the very least not a negative thing, perhaps only neutral.
 
I can't wait until residency match time comes around!
 
Me: Hi Mom
Mom: You got a letter from College Station (my only interview and thus my first choice).
Me: :scared: 😱
Me: College Station, Mom?
Mom: It says UTMB


AAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! Thanks a lot Mom!

I am buying my mother geography lessons for her birthday!

:barf:
 
Alexander Pink said:
Again, that could be the case. But, it seems at the least supremely unlikely that they would send only the files of those that were rejected while not sending those accepted. This is in addition to the fact that they updated some files that included no GPA changes. I feel my logic is sound and stand by my carefully worded conclusion. It is at the very least not a negative thing, perhaps only neutral.

Pink, my understanding is that UTSW accesses information electronically from TMDSAS. So I would think there are not going to be any applications "sent" or "not sent" (although there is not way I could be sure). My guess would be that UTSW will have REAL TIME access to all the updates that TMDSAS makes to applications. Also, why would TMDSAS want to send applications of so-called accepted applications to UTSW even before they are validated?
For all of those who are worried about validation, I think validation and match are completely independent. I don't see any logical reason to match to validation. You shouldn't worry too much about it (easier said than done).
In any case, let's see how many theories will survive Feb 1.
Good luck to everyone.
 
Alexander Pink said:
Again, that could be the case. But, it seems at the least supremely unlikely that they would send only the files of those that were rejected while not sending those accepted. This is in addition to the fact that they updated some files that included no GPA changes. I feel my logic is sound and stand by my carefully worded conclusion. It is at the very least not a negative thing, perhaps only neutral.


As a philo major, you should see the major flaws in your argument.

Let's run through them:

a.) True, no arguments here

b.) It obviously had something to do with updating GPA because you yourself, and many others, said their GPA changed. If you go by my "Maybe those profiles which were updated are those who did not match and their grades are updated because UTSW no has to compile a ranked alternate list?" hypothesis, only those who submitted new transcripts would show a GPA change. If it didn't have anything to do with updating GPA, then your GPA wouldn't have changed.

c.) Sending the information of the rejected applicants only makes just as much sense as sending the accepted applicants. UTSW has to make an Alternate list, and having an updated alternate list would be better than an old list. If you were already matched to UTSW, they wouldn't need your updated information.

d.) Your sample size for the 1/2 and 1/2 argument is WAY too small and not even close to reliable.

e.) You really don't have any idea whether TMDSAS is finished with the match. We all assume it, be we don't know for sure.


Using your logic, my hypothesis is just as likely as yours. Does that mean I can say that the UTSW status change is 100% negative? No.

I appreciate the optimism, and I hope and pray that you are correct, but I will say it again, we really don't have any idea!
 
true blue said:
Me: Hi Mom
Mom: You got a letter from College Station (my only interview and thus my first choice).
Me: :scared: 😱
Me: College Station, Mom?
Mom: It says UTMB


AAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! Thanks a lot Mom!

I am buying my mother geography lessons for her birthday!

:barf:

I think i would have :barf: all over the place if I had been you!

Folks, I think we'll hit 5000 by weeks end!!!
 
Dr.Quiet said:
Jdovez, does your status say "interviewed" or "application received"?

Just checked for you. It still says "interviewed". I wonder if ANYONE's page currently says "application received"? If not, then the theory that UTSW is onto us seems pretty plausible.
 
true blue said:
Me: Hi Mom
Mom: You got a letter from College Station (my only interview and thus my first choice).
Me: :scared: 😱
Me: College Station, Mom?
Mom: It says UTMB


AAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! Thanks a lot Mom!

I am buying my mother geography lessons for her birthday!

:barf:

lol, I'm sure that was heart stopping!! If we give awards to those who induce paranoia arround here, I think you'd be free to nominate your mom an honorary member!

I've had similar happen. The answering machine showed a message, and the caller ID was interpreted as "one of the medical schools called." I checked the message and it was one of those blood bank donation reminders. Apparently any hospital/medically sounding name = medical school I applied to!
 
JDAD said:
As a philo major, you should see the major flaws in your argument.

Let's run through them:

a.) True, no arguments here

b.) It obviously had something to do with updating GPA because you yourself, and many others, said their GPA changed. If you go by my "Maybe those profiles which were updated are those who did not match and their grades are updated because UTSW no has to compile a ranked alternate list?" hypothesis, only those who submitted new transcripts would show a GPA change. If it didn't have anything to do with updating GPA, then your GPA wouldn't have changed.

c.) Sending the information of the rejected applicants only makes just as much sense as sending the accepted applicants. UTSW has to make an Alternate list, and having an updated alternate list would be better than an old list. If you were already matched to UTSW, they wouldn't need your updated information.

d.) Your sample size for the 1/2 and 1/2 argument is WAY too small and not even close to reliable.

e.) You really don't have any idea whether TMDSAS is finished with the match. We all assume it, be we don't know for sure.


Using your logic, my hypothesis is just as likely as yours. Does that mean I can say that the UTSW status change is 100% negative? No.

I appreciate the optimism, and I hope and pray that you are correct, but I will say it again, we really don't have any idea!

Ok JDAD, I will take you up!

b) They would have no need for an application update to formalize a ranked waitlist from those whom did not have any new grades (for instance, grads of 2004)

c) you can see my response for b) In addition, at the very least you are concieding that it would not be a rejection, as they would be using the information to update for a waitlist

d) I agree my sample size is not statistacaly significant. I ony added that as a side point, and my argument does not rely on it. I simply need to show that some people have not been updated

e) no argument hear, I will concied that I do not know that they have completed the match, and am making this assumption ad hoc

I never claimed to have a definitive answer. I took the little inductive evidence we have, formed a deductive argument that fits that evidence and seems more likely than the alternative. My prima facie argument is simply that. Anyhow, I am optimistic and am certainly not out to make anyone feel bad nor imply that if ones status hasn't changed they did not get in. I explicitly put that disclaimed in my statement!
 
jdovez said:
Just checked for you. It still says "interviewed". I wonder if ANYONE's page currently says "application received"? If not, then the theory that UTSW is onto us seems pretty plausible.
Thanks for the info dude. Has it always been "interviewed" or did you have "application received" at some point?
 
Alexander Pink said:
Ok JDAD, I will take you up!

b) They would have no need for an application update to formalize a ranked waitlist from those whom did not have any new grades (for instance, grads of 2004)
c) you can see my response for b) In addition, at the very least you are concieding that it would not be a rejection, as they would be using the information to update for a waitlist
d) I agree my sample size is not statistacaly significant. I ony added that as a side point, and my argument does not rely on it. I simply need to show that some people have not been updated
e) no argument hear, I will concied that I do not know that they have completed the match, and am making this assumption ad hoc

I never claimed to have a definitive answer. I took the little inductive evidence we have, formed a deductive argument that fits that evidence and seems more likely than the alternative. My prima facie argument is simply that. Anyhow, I am optimistic and am certainly not out to make anyone feel bad nor imply that if ones status hasn't changed they did not get in. I explicitly put that disclaimed in my statement!
:laugh: Stop this nonsense! We are going to make ourselves sick and insane over the next few days if this keeps up.

Y'all are logically arguing the unknown. I don't think these dates mean anything!!!!
 
Alexander Pink said:
Ok JDAD, I will take you up!

b) They would have no need for an application update to formalize a ranked waitlist from those whom did not have any new grades (for instance, grads of 2004)

c) you can see my response for b) In addition, at the very least you are concieding that it would not be a rejection, as they would be using the information to update for a waitlist

d) I agree my sample size is not statistacaly significant. I ony added that as a side point, and my argument does not rely on it. I simply need to show that some people have not been updated

e) no argument hear, I will concied that I do not know that they have completed the match, and am making this assumption ad hoc

I never claimed to have a definitive answer. I took the little inductive evidence we have, formed a deductive argument that fits that evidence and seems more likely than the alternative. My prima facie argument is simply that. Anyhow, I am optimistic and am certainly not out to make anyone feel bad nor imply that if ones status hasn't changed they did not get in. I explicitly put that disclaimed in my statement!


It's all good man. I am not out to b!itch and moan. I just wanted to test out my arguing skills. "Girls like guys who have great skillz..."

I do hope your correct in your assumptions and when match time comes, we can raise a glass together!
 
Alexander Pink said:
a) only some applicants had their new files sent to UTSW from TMDSAS
b) this had nothing to do with updating new GPA information
c) There is certainly no reason they would have sent updated app packets of only those applicants rejected (to the neglect of those accepted)

I agree it sounds positive or neutral. I also agree with what someone (you?) said earlier, that many may have missed the brief time that their application showed "app rec." I'm sure many are not quite as nuts, and may not check daily just in case. So, it could be everyone got a quick update to update their accepted/rejected/waitlisted status, and had new TMDSAS stuff added.
 
true blue said:
:laugh: Stop this nonsense! We are going to make ourselves sick and insane over the next few days if this keeps up.

Y'all are logically arguing the unknown. I don't think these dates mean anything!!!!
:laugh: I think it means something actually, but that is just my opinion. And FYI, I have been sick and insane for 3 weeks now!!! :laugh: ANyhow, good luck to everyone! I simply wanted to continue the discussion and offer my personal opinions and deductions, which of course, are subject to being false.
 
JDAD said:
It's all good man. I am not out to b!itch and moan. I just wanted to test out my arguing skills. "Girls like guys who have great skillz..."

I do hope your correct in your assumptions and when match time comes, we can raise a glass together!

Amen brother! Actually, I enjoy my argument being challenged. I can't wait for 5 more days to be completed!
 
Alexander Pink said:
Amen brother! Actually, I enjoy my argument being challenged. I can't wait for 5 more days to be completed!
LOL Pink, if my staus ever showed "application received", I would be dying to find ways to support your theory. Now I am trying to convince myself that your theory is wrong. Either way, we will find out soon enough. Good luck.
 
Dr.Quiet said:
Thanks for the info dude. Has it always been "interviewed" or did you have "application received" at some point?

As far as I am aware it has always been received. However, I think that A Pink was onto something with his theory. I will be very curious to see if anyone who had the "received" message does not get in. However, I believe that if this info did "tip their hand" then they rectified it and no one will again see that message (disclaimer: this is still just a personal opinion). I think that perhaps not everyone that received this change in status got the opportunity to see it, so if the A Pink Theory is correct (as I will now refer to it), I don't think everyone that had the change will know it. Best of luck to you Dr. Q!
 
true blue said:
Me: Hi Mom
Mom: You got a letter from College Station (my only interview and thus my first choice).
Me: :scared: 😱
Me: College Station, Mom?
Mom: It says UTMB


AAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! Thanks a lot Mom!

I am buying my mother geography lessons for her birthday!

:barf:
:barf: indeed.
 
Can someone please find a new smiley face?

I am getting tired of the barfing as I have seen it on almost every page for the last few days.

Someone find a new one.
 
When are you guys going to know exactly? so I can avoid the paranoia in here? I'm way done and you guys are making *me* nervous!
 
roja said:
When are you guys going to know exactly? so I can avoid the paranoia in here? I'm way done and you guys are making *me* nervous!
in 5 days 6 hrs 6 mins 😀 (12:00am, Feb 1st)
 
roja said:
When are you guys going to know exactly? so I can avoid the paranoia in here? I'm way done and you guys are making *me* nervous!
Feb. 1.. midnight

Monday night/Tuesday morning -- does anyone here find themselves having to explain it like this (when asked when will you know) also?

Not you of course, Roja! I'm sure you got it without the additional explaination. I just wrote it in out of habit. 🙂
 
roja said:
When are you guys going to know exactly? so I can avoid the paranoia in here? I'm way done and you guys are making *me* nervous!

Ohhh...I think I'll get online and check on February 4th around noon or so. :laugh:
 
RangerD said:
Ohhh...I think I'll get online and check on February 4th around noon or so. :laugh:

If I were a magic genie...

I would appear to every applicant and offer them $1000 for every day that they don't check their match results.
 
RangerD said:
Ohhh...I think I'll get online and check on February 4th around noon or so. :laugh:

Is anyone REALLY NOT going to check at midnight? Anyone who actually thinks they can sleep instead?
 
jdovez said:
As far as I am aware it has always been received. However, I think that A Pink was onto something with his theory. I will be very curious to see if anyone who had the "received" message does not get in. However, I believe that if this info did "tip their hand" then they rectified it and no one will again see that message (disclaimer: this is still just a personal opinion). I think that perhaps not everyone that received this change in status got the opportunity to see it, so if the A Pink Theory is correct (as I will now refer to it), I don't think everyone that had the change will know it. Best of luck to you Dr. Q!

JDOVEZ, I thought u didn't rank UTSW as your #1. If u didn't, I will start to doubt the theory that "application received" = acceptance. I personally think with your stats, you will match at your top choice school, whether it is UTSW or somethingelse.
 
mwhou said:
Is anyone REALLY NOT going to check at midnight? Anyone who actually thinks they can sleep instead?
I am contemplating this....
 
Top