- Joined
- Mar 28, 2007
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 0
He would clearly fall into the "Demigod" catagory...almost a god, but with some dirt (DDS) on him
Hey guys....was just wondering. What about those oral & maxillofacial surgeons who have both a DDS and MD degree? Are they still losers even though they have their medical degrees from a accredited US medical school? Or is the prestige of a dual degree (DDS, MD) oral & maxillofacial surgeon somewhere in between a MD and a DDS? Look at this guy....he's the director of craniofacial surgery at stanford! Could his job still be considered 'prestigious' despite the fact that he has a DDS? This is very confusing!
http://plasticsurgery.stanford.edu/faculty/schendel.html
Sorry if this offends you but I believe that OMS who have DDS and MD are somewhere between MD and DDS in prestige. The reason being is OMS is widely considered a "backdoor" to getting the MD, and you don't even go through the legitimate full 4 years of med school like every other MD. I'm not even sure if the residency program requires a 1 year medicine internship either like every other residency. Someone can clarify with me on that.
The reason being is OMS is widely considered a "backdoor" to getting the MD, and you don't even go through the legitimate full 4 years of med school like every other MD.
For what it's worth, I've also known a good # of doctors over the years, and I would say that many/most of them don't regret it at all. One of the doctors at work was actually a wall streeter before she went to medical school, and she definitely didn't regret any of it, but she did say that having been out in the real world helped her on this point-she knew what she was getting herself into and knew what options she'd be missing out on, and that's what made it easier for her.Overall, most everybody has mentioned that they would most likely not do medicine if they knew what it was truly was like. Most agree that they would have given dentistry a good look.
Sorry if this offends you but I believe that OMS who have DDS and MD are somewhere between MD and DDS in prestige. The reason being is OMS is widely considered a "backdoor" to getting the MD, and you don't even go through the legitimate full 4 years of med school like every other MD. I'm not even sure if the residency program requires a 1 year medicine internship either like every other residency. Someone can clarify with me on that.
Sorry if this offends you but I believe that OMS who have DDS and MD are somewhere between MD and DDS in prestige. The reason being is OMS is widely considered a "backdoor" to getting the MD, and you don't even go through the legitimate full 4 years of med school like every other MD. I'm not even sure if the residency program requires a 1 year medicine internship either like every other residency. Someone can clarify with me on that.
I think that an OMS has the same prestige than an MD has. If they have the MD, and are surgeons, I don't see how people wouldn't be impressed when they hear "Hi, I'm Dr. ______. I am an Oral and Maxillofacial surgeron." I hold OMS's in the same regard as all surgeons.
You do not go through the full four years because in dental school the first two years are basically the same as in medical school. Hence why some schools like Harvard combine the dental and medical students for the first two years....and others do the same.
The reason behind the DDS/MD for OMS is actually very strange. OMS grads would be perfectly fine doing a four year program and getting the DDS and OMS training without the other two initials, MD. The reason programs integrated this was because of insurance. I just had a conversation with and admissions officer at a dental school about this. Something along the lines that because the OMS surgeon has only the DDS and not the MD, medical insurance companies will not fully cover surgical procedures. This is because dentist have different coverage (none at all in some cases) with insurance companies. So to get around this the schools have integrated the OMS training along with granting the MD initials.
Otherwise the DDS would be able to simply do the four year training and with the suitable rotations/teaching be perfectly capable. Another way insurance companies have plagued medicine........
This notion is pretty much in line with what I've experienced during my medical school clekships and in the hospital wards/OR. Physicans on service don't care much about what initials you have behind your name, as long as you provide quality care in THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY POSSIBLE. THis is often because different specialties work collaboratively on samepatients...eg: OMFS gets consulted frequently to internal medicine svc for facial cellulitis, oral abscess etc....When many of you folks start your medical school career, you'll realize that providing medical care is extremely time consuming...thus a doctor who cannot manage his time well on wards will quickly be...shall we say...disliked.
It's interesting as the 'hostility' towards non-MD health professionals seem to decrease the more advanced I get into my education.
Hostility decreases the following way....
Pre-med (vast majority can't get into med school) > Med school >>> Residency
Your admission officer should do some more research before he informs dental students about dental specialties that he doesn't know much about. Whether you are a single or dual degree surgeon, there is no difference in the insurance reimbursement. The only thing common about insurance is that the reimbusement rates are low and that the insurance companies take their sweet time paying you. Obtaining the MD as OMFS merely reflects that the specialty has expanded in its scope. In fact, OMFS in Europe is a medical specialty, not dental.
Also, while it is true that the first two years of dental school curriculum is same as that in medical school, it's only the subject matter that is the same. That is, you learn about the same things as a medical student does, however the depth in which it is taught isn't quite the same. This isn't to say that dental school curriculum is inadequate or inferior, it's just a reflection of the type of medical diagnostic skills a typical dentist requires. Dentists are not educated to manage a patient's systemic illness, they are taught when and how to render necessary dental treatments in patients with medical problems. For example, vast majority of dental students who are ready to take part I dental boards after studying dental decks etc...will NOT pass USMLE step I, as the material in Step I is more complex. However, a driven dental student can easily pass Step I with some additional self-study time....as I and many other dual degree OMFS guys out there have proved.
I agree that dental students do not study each subject to the same depth. At the same token dental students also have hours of endless lab work to do each night, while the medical students can sit back and study during this time. According to a few dental and medical students that I have spoken with, the first two years of dental school are harder than medical school. But the second two years of medical school are harder than dental when rotations begin.
Besides that, does it not proove that since a medical school awards an MD after doing rotations in a hospital setting that dental students and medical students are at the same level? With that, if a dentist can get his MD and perform such difficult operations is it not believable that a dentist could complete just about any rotation if provided with the background and skills?
Besides that, does it not proove that since a medical school awards an MD after doing rotations in a hospital setting that dental students and medical students are at the same level? With that, if a dentist can get his MD and perform such difficult operations is it not believable that a dentist could complete just about any rotation if provided with the background and skills?
I think that an OMS has the same prestige than an MD has. If they have the MD, and are surgeons, I don't see how people wouldn't be impressed when they hear "Hi, I'm Dr. ______. I am an Oral and Maxillofacial surgeron." I hold OMS's in the same regard as all surgeons.
Do you consider general dentists "surgeons?" I've seen over on the dental board some claim that dentists are surgeons and perform surgery and they use their DDS as justification since it says "doctor of dental surgery."
Or do you subscribe to the popular view that says one isn't a surgeon until they have completed a full surgical residency?
Do you consider general dentists "surgeons?" I've seen over on the dental board some claim that dentists are surgeons and perform surgery and they use their DDS as justification since it says "doctor of dental surgery."
Or do you subscribe to the popular view that says one isn't a surgeon until they have completed a full surgical residency?
Do you consider general dentists "surgeons?" I've seen over on the dental board some claim that dentists are surgeons and perform surgery and they use their DDS as justification since it says "doctor of dental surgery."
Or do you subscribe to the popular view that says one isn't a surgeon until they have completed a full surgical residency?
One more crappy in vitro study that proves absolutely nothing.
Go Alternative Medicine!
Interestingly, the complete soup also lacked cytotoxic activity.
This point can be viewed in a couple of ways. Many general dentist go through continued edu. courses so that they perform different endodontic and prosthetic operations. So in some cases you can consider a general dentist, partially a surgeon.
For the most part I do not think that general dentist walk around claiming that they are surgeons of the human body.
On a sidenote......anybody watch those new laser dentistry procedures....pretty awesome.
I don't think taking continuing ed courses on a procedure and performing the procedure makes a general dentist a "partial surgeon." You're either a surgeon or you're not. No weekend course is ever going to replace 5+ years worth of a surgical residency.
Of course different degrees of surgeons exist and I agree that a 5 year surgical residency does hold more weight in the surgical field. The point stands that some dentist perform surgical procedures, even if they may be minor.
This is true....dentistry is far more surgical / procedural than medical by nature. Many procedures are quite invasive, much more so than what many MD's might think. However, a doctor who practices surgical procedures part time doesn't make them a 'surgeon'. For example, many family practice docs perform excision of skin tags, perform soft tissue biopsies, trephination, I&D, aspiration (especially for olecranon bursitis fluid) etc....which are all surgical procedures by definition. These docs however, never refer themselves as surgeons, because they are not. Thus general dentists calling themselves dental surgeons are not representing themselves accurately. I would have to agree here with MDizzy....the title surgeons should be reserved for someone who has completed an accredited surgical residency.
This is true....dentistry is far more surgical / procedural than medical by nature. Many procedures are quite invasive, much more so than what many MD's might think. However, a doctor who practices surgical procedures part time doesn't make them a 'surgeon'. For example, many family practice docs perform excision of skin tags, perform soft tissue biopsies, trephination, I&D, aspiration (especially for olecranon bursitis fluid) etc....which are all surgical procedures by definition. These docs however, never refer themselves as surgeons, because they are not. Thus general dentists calling themselves dental surgeons are not representing themselves accurately. I would have to agree here with MDizzy....the title surgeons should be reserved for someone who has completed an accredited surgical residency.