- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Messages
- 114
- Reaction score
- 2
SpeedRacer said:i'm adding to the cons: student diversity. man it's like the 16th worst in the nation. how does that happen?
i was wondering why you think block scheduling is a pro. i mean, i don't think it is a con...i just don't know what to think about block vs. no block. what makes one better than the other? i would love an explanation or just your point of view. i'm personally scared ****less about doing anatomy in 12 wks!![]()
It really is a personal preference. My mind tends to go off on tangents and I end up studying more in depth on each subject than I should. Additionally, I find I study more efficiently when the number of subjects is less. It helps me to budget my time better (as there are less subjects) and so I don't worry if I'm spending too much time on one subject or another.
So, instead of taking biochem, anatomy, cell bio, genetics, and neuro all at the same time, I would prefer to concentrate on two or so classes. In undergrad I had the normal class schedule during the fall and spring, with 5 or so classes spread across several months. It wasn't until junior year that I discovered the contracted "intersession" classes that one can take and complete in a couple of weeks. I did considerably better in these and regret I didn't learn about them sooner. Thus, like I said at the beginning, I suppose it really is a matter of how my mind functions. Does this make any sense?