I was just wondering if anyone else out there was having to decide; roomates or no roomates?
Here's my beef for both.
To roomate:
1.) Cost of living is essentially .5 or some similar factor less than living alone.
2.) Social interaction, comradre` and study partners, provided they are all med students.
3.) People to watch each others back on pets, and task like holding the other end of the board or couch . . .
Not to roomate:
1.) Your schedule is the only schedule to work around (ie. sleep, study, music, drink, mess, clean, etc.)
2.) There is no number two, but number one almost deserves repeating again.
Synopsis: I have lived with roomates for 6 years and can say that I am quite good at it. Having lived in complete pigstie fraternity's (and houses) to immaculate well ordered apartments, I have become quite acostomed to just about anything; and anybody! I think my old and current roomates would agree that I'm about as easy to live with as they come. However, I am currently in a job where I must be in the lab by 6:00 am everymorning. This requires me going to bed at ~9:00 so I can be up by 5:00. My roomates, and the rest of the normal world go to bed at 11:00 pm. This leaves me good and sleep deprived by the end of each week.
I can say with 100 percent confidence that the person that lives above me right now . . . can play the intro to almost every pop rock song known to man, but somehow is quit bad at guitar beyond that. I'm reminded of this nearly everytime I'm looking for peace and quiet.
While these things are part of school in general, I would most like to have the best of both worlds, and as of right now, I can't see an obvious solution in mind. So . . . anybody's feedback would be great. I'm about as broke as bad kitchen china, so I have limits.
I'm going to look around KC for living conditions the weekend of 3/8 and 3/9.
Anybody else out there feel my pain? Thanks, John