- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Messages
- 8,022
- Reaction score
- 2,816
- Points
- 5,251
- Attending Physician
Just been notified our vacation will be reduced from 8 weeks to 4 weeks. Been in practice for 8 years and in no way I'm prepared to go back to resident-like vacation. Rumors also going around that salary reduction will be next step. Located in Pittsburgh with ACT model. The local market is a mess with 2 dominant health systems. Maybe time to relocate.
10 - 12 weeks. I wouldn't work anywhere where I got less than 8 weeks vacation. Life is too short.
LMAO. Wow.
Sorry to hear that ScaleneDoc. 50% reduction in Vaca? Why?
Yeah... Sounds like it's time to get out.
They did it because they believe that they could. Administration obviously believes that the anesthesiologists have few alternatives, or the hospital is in such desperate financial straits that they had no choice but to risk a bunch of people leaving.
Dude. According to your avatar, you're a baller. Demand 8 weeks minimum. Seriously.
You're onto something here. With only really 2 systems to work for here, both of them collude to drive down compensation and working conditions. Oh, you don't like it?.. Well have fun leaving the state and don't let the door hit you in the way out. Don't know how they will save $ with reducing vac days. The job market here is about as gloomy now as it has ever been. Have many friends from residency around the country with 8+ weeks, which seems to be the norm.
This is where all the docs need to "collude" together. Administration is counting on the "divide and conquer" tactic.You're onto something here. With only really 2 systems to work for here, both of them collude to drive down compensation and working conditions. Oh, you don't like it?.. Well have fun leaving the state and don't let the door hit you in the way out. Don't know how they will save $ with reducing vac days. The job market here is about as gloomy now as it has ever been. Have many friends from residency around the country with 8+ weeks, which seems to be the norm.
This is where all the docs need to "collude" together. Administration is counting on the "divide and conquer" tactic.
Up north, knew of hospital employed W2 position. 9 of the 30 MDs turned in their resignation papers and another 5 threatened to walk. Having 50% of staff leave within a 60-90 day period scared the crap out of administration. That was enough for administration to call for emergency meeting and in the end, they got a more incentive base system in which most made 50K more.
The way things are going for anesthesiologists, if big corps take over contracts or they become W2 employees of hospital systems than they need to lobby that employed docs need collective bargaining rights as well.
Until that time, I think it's best to discuss with the other MDs and come to a common point. Administration is counting on doctors arguing amongst themselves and not coming to a common ground. Administration is counting at least a 70% retention rate. If that retention rate drops, surgeons don't like working with a whole new different crew. They will let administration hear about it rather quickly.
Agree. The problem is every once in awhile administration will make a bad decision and let those docs resign in the name of not appearing weak or rewarding "bad behavior" and replace a substantial amount or all of the department, relying on locus for an extended period till they can hire permanent folks. You don't sit down at the negotiation table unless you are willing to go all in. You don't go all in unless you are prepared for the other guy to call your bet. Even if the other guy is playing a bad hand. Hospital administrations make multi million dollar mistakes all the time.
Most of us would do the math on our alternatives. At my present stage in life, I would start looking but expect that I would not be tempted in today's market. I would go part time now as opposed to in a few years when I planned to. As a recent grad with student loans, mortgage and baby. I would have eaten sh1t.For the record: If I suddenly had my vacation cut back from 8 weeks to 4 weeks with no negotiation in between... I would be OUTTA there in 2 nanoseconds.
That just screams: IDGAF. Bad decision from the top down. 4 weeks from 8 weeks... really? Greedy. Best groups exist in an environment where administration and said group see eye to eye and work forward to make the best of any situation.
It's more like you will work 50-55 hours a week with 6 weeks vacation for an AMC.I would say that in this era if you get a lot of vacation (i.e. greater than 8 weeks) 3 things need to happen. A lower than expected salary, increased hours per week when you do work or a combo of both. Perhaps the grass is indeed greener but I would rather have 6-8 weeks of vacation with 40-45 hours per week than 16 weeks with 65-80 hr weeks.
I believe a better way to equalize this discussion is to base it on Hours per year FTE. My FTE is roughly 2300 hrs/year . The debate on how to distribute those hours is an entirely different discussion and is based mostly on personal preference
Most of us would do the math on our alternatives. At my present stage in life, I would start looking but expect that I would not be tempted in today's market. I would go part time now as opposed to in a few years when I planned to. As a recent grad with student loans, mortgage and baby. I would have eaten sh1t.
How many weeks do you get?
Sorry residents but I'm not talking about you guys. Your time is coming.
Part timers please don't respond.
How many hours per week do u work in those 35 weeks?I get 17 weeks off
How many hours per week do u work in those 35 weeks?
Big city? Medium or small? Working spouse or non working spouse?
There are jobs where one can get 20 plus weeks off. But usually in smaller towns and the trade off is being on call almost every day or q2 call but they aren't super busy.
Just hard to imagine 17 weeks off in a big unless u take major income hit working "full time".