Hi guys! I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask thing, but I'm struggling with something and wanted to get some opinions.
I am a non-traditional student who was not originally on the vet path, and have been in a masters program while also trying to rack up some shadowing hours since switching from human med track to animal med. I'm low on hours and I know that, about 300 vet hours specifically, but have a pretty good mix of small animal private practice, shelter med, zoo med, wildlife rehab, and equine but because I've been trying to have a very diverse set of hours because of my shortened time, I don't have a super strong relationship with the vet I shadow with every week at the small animal clinic. She's very dry and a little hard for me to read, and I've been shadowing there for about 7 months but they've been training two new techs in that time so I mostly just observed them learning. I also recently interned at a zoo and only spent two weeks with the veterinarian, but they were in the middle of a research study that I was able to play a big role in and developed an awesome relationship with the veterinarian there in a short amount of time. He offered to write me a LOR because of it! I gained so much confidence at the zoo, that I have been speaking up more at my small animal clinic and asking to be shown things and it has definitely helped, but not as much as I would have liked before needing LORs. I definitely put this off because of my anxiety.
My dilemma though is I definitely know that the zoo vet's LOR will be stronger than my small animal clinic, but I feel like it will look fishy if I don't ask the SA clinic after being with them for 7 months and the zoo vet only two weeks, even though zoo med is what I want to do.
I'm trying to decide if its worse to have a "meh" letter in addition to the zoo vet or to not have asked someone I spent more time with and that potentially look bad.