I wonder if they've started factoring in stuff like personal statements, previous employment or other aspects of one's application that makes them appear to be diverse, mature etc., and if references play a larger role when considering interview invites. I know these things used to be considered after one got an interview invite, which was pretty much based on grades, but they could have changed their strategy in terms of looking for x kinds of people who stand out because of x, because a lot of us look the same shade of grey in terms of grades. I wish I had an answer for you guys. If anything, it just disheartens me for next year, because more applicants keep creeping out of the woodwork and it's just getting tougher to get offered a seat. If you look back on their stats (which used to be published), in 2011, something like mid-80s applicants applied from the most competitive provinces like AB and BC, and around 56 applied from SK. Last year, 132 Albertans applied. That's just an insane increase in people. There's gotta be something about our applications that makes us look greater than the sum of our parts when they consider who to extend interview offers to. And it's worrisome that, for example, my attractiveness as an applicant this year will get me nowhere next year if I'm not admitted for c/o 2017. It's just crazy.