What happens to people that lie during the application process?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
If you found a way, would it be ok to cheat on the MCAT?

The better question is, do you think I care if I found out someone in my class did? I never said it's right to do everything you possibly can. I simply said that most likely everyone can be considered to have lied in one way or another whether or not it's about their passion for medicine or their ECs. But if it doesn't affect their ability to be a doctor, what do I care? Everyone can choose to draw the line of how much they want to lie/cheat wherever they want. Like I said, as long as you can back it up.
 
I would love to stoop to your level and make some comment about how your personality and your so called "morals" reminds me of someone who would have been very successful during with Salem Witch Hunts or perhaps be a perfect right hand man to McCarthy during the Red Hunt in persecuting thousands of innocent people. But I am only THAT cynical on Friday.

You know, you should be an academic advisor, we could send you overseas to Iraq and you would do more damage to them than our government ever did.

At the end of the day, the only thing that any of us have that matters is personal integrity. None of the other trappings really matter - med school admissions, money, prestige, etc.

I cease to be amazed by the number of people who so willingly sell out their personal integrity to acquire the other...
 
Count me out too.

And I agree with you here on the hoops and hurdles aspect of med school apps. If it weren't a requirement to do the volunteer/clinical/shadowing bit, while I might do a little of it just to expose myself to the environment, I sure as hell wouldn't put in all the hours I have been putting in...and I resent people who cavalierly lie about these activities on their apps.

*claps for the person who makes personal attacks then says he's out becuase this is turning into a personal argument*
 
I don't think some of the people posting here realize the real world isn't full of idolized morally driven individuals. To believe, most or even a majority of applicants don't emblish their aps or during an interview is quite naive. The truth is most people lie, and you better get use to it quick. Believing everyone around you is being completely honest is a very dangers thing. You're going to have patients lying to you about their drinking and drug habits, and you cannot blindly believe them because you think most people are honest.
 
At the end of the day, the only thing that any of us have that matters is personal integrity. None of the other trappings really matter - med school admissions, money, prestige, etc.

I cease to be amazed by the number of people who so willingly sell out their personal integrity to acquire the other...

In a perfect world, you might be right. Until we all live in utopia, we have to learn to accept everyone's actions and not be so judgemental. Live by your own morals, but accept other people's morality becuase that is reality.
 
The better question is, do you think I care if I found out someone in my class did? I never said it's right to do everything you possibly can. I simply said that most likely everyone can be considered to have lied in one way or another whether or not it's about their passion for medicine or their ECs. But if it doesn't affect their ability to be a doctor, what do I care? Everyone can choose to draw the line of how much they want to lie/cheat wherever they want. Like I said, as long as you can back it up.

So your position is anything goes to get into medical school. Lie on your app, cheat on your MCAT, or get your family to pay off the governor to get you into school (as recently happened in FL). None of this matters as long as the person can learn to be a doctor. Furthermore, we should not judge a person who does these things, because we have just chosen a different strategy--honest, hard work.

I disagree. I think as a society and as students we should judge people who take a shortcut to get into medical school. Admitting dishonest individuals is bad for our profession and for our patients.
 
So your position is anything goes to get into medical school. Lie on your app, cheat on your MCAT, or get your family to pay off the governor to get you into school (as recently happened in FL). None of this matters as long as the person can learn to be a doctor. Furthermore, we should not judge a person who does these things, because we have just chosen a different strategy--honest, hard work.

I disagree. I think as a society and as students we should judge people who take a shortcut to get into medical school. Admitting dishonest individuals is bad for our profession and for our patients.

Hey man, if that's your stand on things, then that's where you draw the line. For me, my line is broad. You are going to have to ask me case by case to get an answer out of me.

Can I accept someone kills another person to get into med school? no. Can i accept paying someone to get someone else into med school who doesn't have the academic abilities to be there? no.

I don't think one can say exactly where one's (at least not for me) moral beliefs are based on generalizations. I'm not sure where exactly along the line that you got that I have no morals, whereas I simply said med applicants probably all lie to some degree and that doesn't necessarily bother me as long as they are good doctors.
 
So your position is anything goes to get into medical school. Lie on your app, cheat on your MCAT, or get your family to pay off the governor to get you into school (as recently happened in FL). None of this matters as long as the person can learn to be a doctor. Furthermore, we should not judge a person who does these things, because we have just chosen a different strategy--honest, hard work.

I disagree. I think as a society and as students we should judge people who take a shortcut to get into medical school. Admitting dishonest individuals is bad for our profession and for our patients.

Answer me this, if a skilled surgeon who just performed neurosurgery on an infant and saved his life. Would you think less of him as a doctor if he told you he only did 200 hours of community service instead of the 400 that he wrote down after fudging the numbers?
 
So your position is anything goes to get into medical school. Lie on your app, cheat on your MCAT, or get your family to pay off the governor to get you into school (as recently happened in FL). None of this matters as long as the person can learn to be a doctor. Furthermore, we should not judge a person who does these things, because we have just chosen a different strategy--honest, hard work.

I disagree. I think as a society and as students we should judge people who take a shortcut to get into medical school. Admitting dishonest individuals is bad for our profession and for our patients.

Let me ask you what your opinion is on this hypothetical situation. Let's say you know a doctor who is about to retire. Lets say that somehow you know for a fact that he is very honest and has never done anything significantly unethical, especially in his field of medicine. If he suddenly told you that he grossly exaggerated on his application to med school, what would you think of him? This is after the fact that he has been an honest person from then on and has been a good doctor.
 
Let me ask you what your opinion is on this hypothetical situation. Let's say you know a doctor who is about to retire. Lets say that somehow you know for a fact that he is very honest and has never done anything significantly unethical, especially in his field of medicine. If he suddenly told you that he grossly exaggerated on his application to med school, what would you think of him? This is after the fact that he has been an honest person from then on and has been a good doctor.

beat you to it by 1 minute 😀
 
Answer me this, if a skilled surgeon who just performed neurosurgery on an infant and saved his life. Would you think less of him as a doctor if he told you he only did 200 hours of community service instead of the 400 that he wrote down after fudging the numbers?
Holy hell we just posted nearly the exact same thing HAHA!
 
In a perfect world, you might be right. Until we all live in utopia, we have to learn to accept everyone's actions and not be so judgemental. Live by your own morals, but accept other people's morality becuase that is reality.

Since you are so sure of the correctness of your positions, why don't you show this thread and what you have written on it to your parents, your adviser, your significant other? Or have you put up an effective facade to all of them that hides your true character that you have revealed here in online anonymity?

Did you or some of you others espousing the virtues of lying to get into med school ever take a class in ethics? If you did, did you laugh at the foolishness of it all?

You really need to examine and understand the fallacy of the moral relativism that you are espousing. When there are no lines, no rules, and moving goalposts depending on whose playing field you are on, you may find yourself getting crushed by someone else's "morality"...be careful what you wish for, grasshopper.
 
Let me ask you what your opinion is on this hypothetical situation. Let's say you know a doctor who is about to retire. Lets say that somehow you know for a fact that he is very honest and has never done anything significantly unethical, especially in his field of medicine. If he suddenly told you that he grossly exaggerated on his application to med school, what would you think of him? This is after the fact that he has been an honest person from then on and has been a good doctor.

What I would assume from your example is that the doctor was remorseful for a lie he had told decades prior, and had adjusted his way of dealing with his life from that point forward.

I don't think any of you "liars" are anywhere close to acknowledging that lying is wrong, nor do I see any of you changing your ways henceforth...for some of you, lying is a bedrock principle.
 
Hey well what do you know, it's the guy who said he was out on the account of posts being too much "personal arguments". Maybe I should say I'm out on the account of people being hypocrites.

Since you are so sure of the correctness of your positions, why don't you show this thread and what you have written on it to your parents, your adviser, your significant other? Or have you put up an effective facade to all of them that hides your true character that you have revealed here in online anonymity?

Why don't I? simple. One, I don't have to prove anything to you, who doesn't make any impact in my life what so ever. Two, your accusition of anonoymity goes right back to you, how are we to know what YOU are like in real life? and Three, why would I show anything to you who has clearly demonstrated your lack of ability to tolerate other people's morals/views/opinions?

Did you or some of you others espousing the virtues of lying to get into med school ever take a class in ethics? If you did, did you laugh at the foolishness of it all?

No more so than we are laughing at the foolishness of you at the moment. So you tell me, did we?

You really need to examine and understand the fallacy of the moral relativism that you are espousing. When there are no lines, no rules, and moving goalposts depending on whose playing field you are on, you may find yourself getting crushed by someone else's "morality"...be careful what you wish for, grasshopper.

There you go again generalizing and making assumptions about other people's views again in trying to find allies in those who knows well to not step into the extreme views.
 
What I would assume from your example is that the doctor was remorseful for a lie he had told decades prior, and had adjusted his way of dealing with his life from that point forward.

I don't think any of you "liars" are anywhere close to acknowledging that lying is wrong, nor do I see any of you changing your ways henceforth...for some of you, lying is a bedrock principle.

How did that saying go again?

oh right...
When you assume, you make an as$ out of u and me
 
I'm gonna go take a final but let me ask one other quick thing. What do you guys think of a doctor who is about to retire who has been a liar his whole life, including his career in medicine, but has contributed more altruism towards society and more advances in medicine than anyone else?
 
I feel bad for the handful of people still reading this thread... if you still want to argue flip, you can PM me. It's almost time for me to get off work anyways.
 
I feel bad for the handful of people still reading this thread... if you still want to argue flip, you can PM me. It's almost time for me to get off work anyways.

Nah, I am done here.

You just need to get your mind right, son.
 
What I would assume from your example is that the doctor was remorseful for a lie he had told decades prior, and had adjusted his way of dealing with his life from that point forward.

I don't think any of you "liars" are anywhere close to acknowledging that lying is wrong, nor do I see any of you changing your ways henceforth...for some of you, lying is a bedrock principle.

I'm sorry, but what are you basing this assumption on? You know just abut as much about the "liars" on this forum as you do about the "remorseful" doctor.

Also, in regards to your assertion that none of the "liars" on here are anywhere close to acknowledging that lying is wrong, if you are lumping me into that category again I want to point out that I said several times that lying *is* wrong. Convenient that you didn't respond to *those* posts.
 
Answer me this, if a skilled surgeon who just performed neurosurgery on an infant and saved his life. Would you think less of him as a doctor if he told you he only did 200 hours of community service instead of the 400 that he wrote down after fudging the numbers?

Yes. I would think less of him as a person, and therefore less of him as a doctor.
 
Epi, your logic is false. Your assumption is that if a person is smart enough to complete med school and become a licensed physician, it doesn't matter how he got there.

Other qualities aside from mental capacity are important in evaluation of applicants. Why do you think they evaluate people on their service activities, their extracurricular interests, and ethical dilemmas? Doctors aren't just computers that spit out diagnoses and orders, they are people who need to care for others and who face ethical dilemmas every day on the job. In my opinion falsifying your volunteer record or EC's is just as bad as altering the grades on your transcript. Either way you are proving you are dishonest and untrustworthy. Just because exaggerating your ECs is easier to do, doesn't mean isn't as bad.
 
Epi, your logic is false. Your assumption is that if a person is smart enough to complete med school and become a licensed physician, it doesn't matter how he got there.

Other qualities aside from mental capacity are important in evaluation of applicants. Why do you think they evaluate people on their service activities, their extracurricular interests, and ethical dilemmas? Doctors aren't just computers that spit out diagnoses and orders, they are people who need to care for others and who face ethical dilemmas every day on the job. In my opinion falsifying your volunteer record or EC's is just as bad as altering the grades on your transcript. Either way you are proving you are dishonest and untrustworthy. Just because exaggerating your ECs is easier to do, doesn't mean isn't as bad.

Sorry to be rude, but this line of reasoning is unsophisticated and trite, in other words, very middle-class. To address your deficiencies I would read, in the following order:

The Moral Animal, by Robert Wright
The Genealogy of Morals, by Nietzsche
The Plague, by Albert Camus

Hopefully you'll come out of this process with a better understanding of human morality, and possess a little bit more Christian mildness.
 
Sorry to be rude, but this line of reasoning is unsophisticated and trite, in other words, very middle-class. To address your deficiencies I would read, in the following order:

The Moral Animal, by Robert Wright
The Genealogy of Morals, by Nietzsche
The Plague, by Albert Camus

Hopefully you'll come out of this process with a better understanding of human morality, and possess a little bit more Christian mildness.
Wouldn't it be a little easier if you just told him the flaws in his reasoning?

And do tell how "unsophisticated and trite" is equivalent to "middle-class," which is a financial status.
 
Sorry to be rude, but this line of reasoning is unsophisticated and trite, in other words, very middle-class. To address your deficiencies I would read, in the following order:

The Moral Animal, by Robert Wright
The Genealogy of Morals, by Nietzsche
The Plague, by Albert Camus

Hopefully you'll come out of this process with a better understanding of human morality, and possess a little bit more Christian mildness.

Agreed. To say that all lies are equally egregious just by virtue of their being lies is a huge oversimplification.
 
Epi, your logic is false. Your assumption is that if a person is smart enough to complete med school and become a licensed physician, it doesn't matter how he got there.

Other qualities aside from mental capacity are important in evaluation of applicants. Why do you think they evaluate people on their service activities, their extracurricular interests, and ethical dilemmas? Doctors aren't just computers that spit out diagnoses and orders, they are people who need to care for others and who face ethical dilemmas every day on the job. In my opinion falsifying your volunteer record or EC's is just as bad as altering the grades on your transcript. Either way you are proving you are dishonest and untrustworthy. Just because exaggerating your ECs is easier to do, doesn't mean isn't as bad.

You present very radical views but such is life. That is the beauty of diversification in the medical field...people as different as you and I get in. The bottom line is that "unethical and amoral" people like me (and just about everyone else in this thread who doesn't share your views) get into medical school and you are going to have to work with us and, who knows, maybe even below us.
 
I emailed Miley Cyrus and she told me that lying on your application is fine...so I guess I believe her noewMiley Cyrus' Opinion>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyone else's opinion
 
HA! in MY religion we just confess our sins and it's A-OKAY!

I pity you, non-christian 😀

you mean non-Catholic. i'm Lutheran, buddy -- we're the real Christians 😉
 
Wouldn't it be a little easier if you just told him the flaws in his reasoning?

And do tell how "unsophisticated and trite" is equivalent to "middle-class," which is a financial status.

iono, I thought it was pretty cool to call someone's argument "middle-class"

In matter of fact, I think I might start to use that term more often in real life 😀
 
Yes. I would think less of him as a person, and therefore less of him as a doctor.

I guess we agree to disagree then. Did you know that Einstein used treat his kids in ways what now would be considered child abuse, George Washington used to own and beat his slaves, and that even Mother Teresa is rumored to have lied about her life devotion to her faith (good thing that lier never applied for med school)? And these are just among the lowest people I can think of...
 
Epi, your logic is false. Your assumption is that if a person is smart enough to complete med school and become a licensed physician, it doesn't matter how he got there.

Other qualities aside from mental capacity are important in evaluation of applicants. Why do you think they evaluate people on their service activities, their extracurricular interests, and ethical dilemmas? Doctors aren't just computers that spit out diagnoses and orders, they are people who need to care for others and who face ethical dilemmas every day on the job. In my opinion falsifying your volunteer record or EC's is just as bad as altering the grades on your transcript. Either way you are proving you are dishonest and untrustworthy. Just because exaggerating your ECs is easier to do, doesn't mean isn't as bad.

Clearly people who emboss their EC's are unable to handle any medical ethical dilemmas that they might meet as a doctor. Why don't we just save our time and say that if you have ever lied about anything, even a white lie, then you are a person who cannot possibly be a person who can contribute to society. Afterall, according to you, a lie is a lie, and a lie is the same thing as cheating, as stealing, or as anything else immoral you can do. If you have lied, then clearly you are incapable of doing anything morally and society should judge you as such.
 
I guess we agree to disagree then. Did you know that Einstein used treat his kids in ways what now would be considered child abuse, George Washington used to own and beat his slaves, and that even Mother Teresa is rumored to have lied about her life devotion to her faith (good thing that lier never applied for med school)? And these are just among the lowest people I can think of...

not to mention the fact that many (if not the majority) of the brightest and most influential people in history have shamelessly engaged in the most torrid of sexual affairs.
 
Wouldn't it be a little easier if you just told him the flaws in his reasoning?

And do tell how "unsophisticated and trite" is equivalent to "middle-class," which is a financial status.

👍 That was some fine elitist d-baggery. I wonder if his daily conversations resemble that post...
 
You present very radical views but such is life. That is the beauty of diversification in the medical field...people as different as you and I get in. The bottom line is that "unethical and amoral" people like me (and just about everyone else in this thread who doesn't share your views) get into medical school and you are going to have to work with us and, who knows, maybe even below us.

Before hearing from all of you I would have thought it was radical to falsify your record to get into medical school. Now I realize that since it's easy and you are unlikely to get caught, it is fine. Actually, most people in the thread agree with me that falsifying your record is wrong (see first few pages). They just gave up on you a while ago.

I guess we agree to disagree then. Did you know that Einstein used treat his kids in ways what now would be considered child abuse, George Washington used to own and beat his slaves, and that even Mother Teresa is rumored to have lied about her life devotion to her faith (good thing that lier never applied for med school)? And these are just among the lowest people I can think of...

And I think less of them all for it, and I hope you do too.

Clearly people who emboss their EC's are unable to handle any medical ethical dilemmas that they might meet as a doctor. Why don't we just save our time and say that if you have ever lied about anything, even a white lie, then you are a person who cannot possibly be a person who can contribute to society. Afterall, according to you, a lie is a lie, and a lie is the same thing as cheating, as stealing, or as anything else immoral you can do. If you have lied, then clearly you are incapable of doing anything morally and society should judge you as such.

If you have lied and falsified your record society has every right to judge you. You better believe that if a med school realizes you have fudged your record, your app is going right into the fireplace. Why do you think that is? I mean, come on, it's no big deal, they know what goes on. They shouldn't judge you.

Padding your record isn't as bad as some things you could lie about, but it sure isn't as benign as telling Aunt Millie how pretty her sweater is. It isn't any better than lying about your grades or your work experience or anything else on your application.

I'll take middle class as a compliment. I am middle class, as are most honest, hard-working Americans who would find your resume padding disgusting. Anyway, I'm beating my head against the wall. Best of luck. You probably won't get caught.
 
Sorry to be rude, but this line of reasoning is unsophisticated and trite, in other words, very middle-class. To address your deficiencies I would read, in the following order:

The Moral Animal, by Robert Wright
The Genealogy of Morals, by Nietzsche
The Plague, by Albert Camus

Hopefully you'll come out of this process with a better understanding of human morality, and possess a little bit more Christian mildness.

Wait, forgive my simpleness, are you being sarcastic or are you for real?
Let me make sure that I understand, my mediocre social standing really limits my cognitive abilities. So you would say that members of the upper-class are the most moral.... and you equate chrisitanity with being upper-class and mild?

My middle-class mouth is agape (thank God I'm not lower-class or I'd be drooling). I'm at a loss for words.
 
wow what a heated argument...

obviously med schools don't want you to lie or embelish anything... however if it was such a big deal for them if u worked 1000 hours at the hopsital versus 900 versus 20...then they would ask you to put a contact number ... i don't think they care about the actual details... they care about what kind of person you are and if you possess qualities that most ppl who really participated in these ec's possess...they will figure this out in your interviews and by reading your letters of recs...for instance...if u put down that u were the president of your pre med committee, and won your state debate championship but in an interview u had no personal skills and couldn't think quickly on your feet...they would assume you were lying but most likely reject you because u lacked these qualities...

now if u r a person who can think quickly, and can communicate well... i don't think they really need to verify how u attained these skills other wise they would... it is an honor system...however they must know that with 20,000 applicants and with 10,000 matriculants that some ppl fudge things...

but certain things are important to them....gpa, mcat scores, letters of rec...so they go through extra steps to verify these things...

and no one thinks lying is okay..but i tend to agree with amcas and med schools... lying about gpa, mcat score, transcripts, and criminal history is a lot worse and has more of a negative impact on the medical profession and credibility of this process than lying about e.c's and number of volunteer hours...this is why they spend the extra time, money, and personel on verifying the first group.

i would like to say though that i didn't lie about a thing on my amcas because 1. i am a non trad and had more than enough things personally and professionally to write about and 2. i have horrible luck and i learned early on in life that while some other ppl can get away with lying i can not do it well...and if i put that i shadowed someone i didn't...it would have been my luck that my interviewer would have been best friends with the person...🙂
 
Okay, if you have not applied yet and you're reading this thread:

1. It is not necessary to lie to get into med school.
2. Despite the impression you get from this thread...not everyone does it.

Maintain your self-respect. Be yourself, work hard, tell the truth. If your grades are good enough, you MCAT is high enough, you have good interpersonal skills, and you can display a sufficient level of understanding of what it means to be a doctor (usually due to some clincal exposure), you can get into med school. You may get beat out at some schools because others with equal qualifications lied to make themselves stand out...it's a fact of life. But that's for them to deal with.

👍

Sigh...SDN...
 
it never even occurred to me to lie or exaggerate on my AMCAS. i've never conceived of work in terms of "hours," just in terms of dates. when AMCAS asked me for hours/week, i took the total number of hours that i probably worked (but again, no idea how close i was to the actual number) and divided it by the number of weeks i worked there. or just put "2"

my research experience was lame, and i said so. my work and clinical experience were robust, and i said so. i also listed a half-dozen "leadership positions" that i had as an undergrad, but even taking the 5 minutes to do that seemed like a chore. i thought that most of my ECs were pretty irrelevant, so i focused on 1 EC, my clinical work experience, and my business work experience.

what kind of lie would be impressive enough that it would actually make a difference in a person's app? that's what i don't understand.
 
Before hearing from all of you I would have thought it was radical to falsify your record to get into medical school. Now I realize that since it's easy and you are unlikely to get caught, it is fine.

FINALLY YOU UNDERSTAND :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Before hearing from all of you I would have thought it was radical to falsify your record to get into medical school. Now I realize that since it's easy and you are unlikely to get caught, it is fine. Actually, most people in the thread agree with me that falsifying your record is wrong (see first few pages). They just gave up on you a while ago.

yes, don't even indluge in the possibility that people sign on at different times but let's draw a conclusion based on limited sampling. It's logics like these that twart things like the accuracy of evidence based medicine.

And I think less of them all for it, and I hope you do too.

By your definition then, there is no good person in the world. Afterall, I don't know a great person in history who hasn't done something that was "immoral" by your standards. I can't but ask the question... who is more cynical now?

If you have lied and falsified your record society has every right to judge you. You better believe that if a med school realizes you have fudged your record, your app is going right into the fireplace. Why do you think that is? I mean, come on, it's no big deal, they know what goes on. They shouldn't judge you.

That seems like a radical point of view. You don't think you lied about your records? I bet I can find many places on your apps where you fudged the number of hours you spent on an EC. It may not be that you thought you could lie big time and get away with it, but I'll bet there were times where you thought you did so many hours of work but in reality you performed sub that amount. It's understandable that people make an estimation of their efforts on their application in favor of showing that they are deserving. Hence what I said before, it's not a matter of if people lie, it's a matter of how much they lie. Draw the line on how much, not if. Becuase I don't believe that anyone can truly say that they didn't "lie" in the sense of embossment that previous radical posters have suggested. What gets me is the fact that people are so willing to judge others that they don't recongize what they do is the same thing. So when they make radical comments, it gets to me.

But if you can say that you are someone who kept track of all your times and say that you didn't at all lie on your records, then I have to say I think less of you if not for the fact that I think it's BS, then for the fact that I think you as some sort of gunner student who would go the ways to record down anything in your life that can be counted toward strenghening your med app. Not that I think you would care, the reason I consider myself to have lied on my apps is becuase I couldn't honestly remember every hour I worked, so I optimistically guessed. But I see that as having the same underlying motivation as someone who has lied considerabily more than me. So, I won't judge someone just becuase I hear that they have lied on their apps until I undertand the degree of what they did. Especially since I don't even think the application process is an accurate measure of how good a doctor you will be (which for us pre-meds, is the paramount goal)

Padding your record isn't as bad as some things you could lie about, but it sure isn't as benign as telling Aunt Millie how pretty her sweater is. It isn't any better than lying about your grades or your work experience or anything else on your application.

You are the person who is willing to cancel the works of all those great people in history because they have not been the prefect saints that you must judge them to be. But now you are telling me it's okay to tell a lie? I ask you sir, where do you draw YOUR line?
 
iono, I thought it was pretty cool to call someone's argument "middle-class"

In matter of fact, I think I might start to use that term more often in real life 😀
Be prepared to be called elitist.
 
But if you can say that you are someone who kept track of all your times and say that you didn't at all lie on your records, then I have to say I think less of you if not for the fact that I think it's BS, then for the fact that I think you as some sort of gunner student who would go the ways to record down anything in your life that can be counted toward strenghening your med app.

A truly asinine comment.

I keep a log of all my volunteer hours and physician shadowing. Pretty damn simple contemporaneous recordkeeping.

For someone who claims to not be judgmental, and to not care what others do if they can "back up the boast," you sure do seem highly judgmental about the motives of someone who is simply keeping track of his EC hours.
 
But if you can say that you are someone who kept track of all your times and say that you didn't at all lie on your records, then I have to say I think less of you if not for the fact that I think it's BS, then for the fact that I think you as some sort of gunner student who would go the ways to record down anything in your life that can be counted toward strenghening your med app.
God forbid someone be responsible and take note of what they did. I didn't record individual hours for individual activities, but I certainly kept track of what I did. If you honestly think that makes someone a gunner, then you have no idea what a gunner actually is.

Would you think an employee was a real gunner for recording all their hours that they spent at work?
 
yes, don't even indluge in the possibility that people sign on at different times but let's draw a conclusion based on limited sampling. It's logics like these that twart things like the accuracy of evidence based medicine.

This has nothing to do with evidence based medicine. Bawer claimed that most people on the thread agreed that lying was no big deal. This was, in fact, untrue.


By your definition then, there is no good person in the world. Afterall, I don't know a great person in history who hasn't done something that was "immoral" by your standards. I can't but ask the question... who is more cynical now?

Uhh...what? I still think Einstein and Washington were American heroes. They did great things for our country. That doesn't mean that I have to ignore or condone immoral things they did in their lives.

By the way, you sir, are no Einstein. You are just another pre-med trying to game the system. There are plenty of honest people that get rejected each year. They deserve your spot.

That seems like a radical point of view. You don't think you lied about your records? I bet I can find many places on your apps where you fudged the number of hours you spent on an EC. It may not be that you thought you could lie big time and get away with it, but I'll bet there were times where you thought you did so many hours of work but in reality you performed sub that amount. It's understandable that people make an estimation of their efforts on their application in favor of showing that they are deserving. Hence what I said before, it's not a matter of if people lie, it's a matter of how much they lie. Draw the line on how much, not if. Becuase I don't believe that anyone can truly say that they didn't "lie" in the sense of embossment that previous radical posters have suggested. What gets me is the fact that people are so willing to judge others that they don't recongize what they do is the same thing. So when they make radical comments, it gets to me.

There is a big difference between estimating the number of hours you spent and doubling the number of hours you spent or making up activities. Estimation is acceptable and actually desired by schools. If you estimate that you worked 3 hours per week in a lab, but neglect to say that you didn't work the week of Christmas and you were sick one week in October, this is not lying. Lying is saying I worked 400 hours when you only worked 200 hours, an example you gave in a previous post. Lying is saying you have clinical/shadowing/volunteer experience when you really did nothing.

But if you can say that you are someone who kept track of all your times and say that you didn't at all lie on your records, then I have to say I think less of you if not for the fact that I think it's BS, then for the fact that I think you as some sort of gunner student who would go the ways to record down anything in your life that can be counted toward strenghening your med app. Not that I think you would care, the reason I consider myself to have lied on my apps is becuase I couldn't honestly remember every hour I worked, so I optimistically guessed. But I see that as having the same underlying motivation as someone who has lied considerabily more than me. So, I won't judge someone just becuase I hear that they have lied on their apps until I undertand the degree of what they did. Especially since I don't even think the application process is an accurate measure of how good a doctor you will be (which for us pre-meds, is the paramount goal)

I think your posts have proven that your primary goal is not to become a good doctor, but to get into medical school at all costs. If you wanted to become a good doctor, you would actually be interested in spending time learning from other doctors and helping people, instead of just making it up.

You are the person who is willing to cancel the works of all those great people in history because they have not been the prefect saints that you must judge them to be. But now you are telling me it's okay to tell a lie? I ask you sir, where do you draw YOUR line?

Who said anything about canceling their works? We can respect their work and still deplore their ownership of slaves or whatever the sin may be.
 
Thought I might share a story. When I applied, an uncle of mine was on the adcom of a med school (I didn't get int'd there...so much for nepotism haha). He called me once or twice to give me tips on applying. He suggested lying about how much volunteer work I'd done...3 years instead of the actual 8 mon, because schools don't check that stuff. I had no research exp, so he wanted me to put that I had done research under him, and that he'd vouch for it. I was a little taken aback by it, and didn't do any of it, but I thought it'd be a good story to add here.
 
Thought I might share a story. When I applied, an uncle of mine was on the adcom of a med school (I didn't get int'd there...so much for nepotism haha). He called me once or twice to give me tips on applying. He suggested lying about how much volunteer work I'd done...3 years instead of the actual 8 mon, because schools don't check that stuff. I had no research exp, so he wanted me to put that I had done research under him, and that he'd vouch for it. I was a little taken aback by it, and didn't do any of it, but I thought it'd be a good story to add here.

much respect
 
Thought I might share a story. When I applied, an uncle of mine was on the adcom of a med school (I didn't get int'd there...so much for nepotism haha). He called me once or twice to give me tips on applying. He suggested lying about how much volunteer work I'd done...3 years instead of the actual 8 mon, because schools don't check that stuff. I had no research exp, so he wanted me to put that I had done research under him, and that he'd vouch for it. I was a little taken aback by it, and didn't do any of it, but I thought it'd be a good story to add here.

Good for you.

I am sure he meant well, but that is a little disconcerting coming from an adcom. I would feel very conflicted about a relative who made such an "offer" to me.

And I hope that I would have the courage of my convictions to do what you did.
 
It depends on the lie. Some are far worse than others, obviously.

I agree with pretty much everyone here that lying about stats and EC and similar things (credentials) is wrong and shouldn't be done. There are certain fibs however that don't matter (minor ones). For example:

Of all the interviews I attended, I knew one of the schools is more rural family-medicine-oriented. I have completely zero intentions of ever doing family medicine in some back-country town. No way. Yet, when they asked, I stated that I had considered it as an option. I knew that if I told them straight-up that I want to do private practice I would have been possibly looked down upon in not fitting their mission statement. So I fibbed. Had I attended their school, I would have had the same end goal anyway. But that's obviously a more innocuous lie. God forbid we're not ALL altruistic machines who lead lives of sacrifice and giving up everything for others. Don't get me wrong, I want to help people and am passionate about the "good" aspects of medicine, but in the end it's a job like any other and I want to be happy in my life too.
 
Top