- Joined
- Mar 15, 2006
- Messages
- 216
- Reaction score
- 0
Dantt,
Is that confirmed info or speculation about whether deferrals are likely or not likely?
O.k. I get that about sharing information. As you know, I try and not be totally anonymous in threads, so that shifts a little bit about how much I want to share - I know, defeats the purpose of an anonymous forum. However, I agree with the comment that sharing is what is meant to be happening here, and that only a few are doing so. And so, in an attempt to balance that a bit - I have called a couple of times, and of course I am sending info here and there. I have not called since last week, and I don't know what kind of movement is happening in terms of leading up to deferral. Hence, why I'm asking about whether the deferral info was speculation etc.
I hope that helps in terms of promoting sharing, and at the same time preserves what I'm trying to do which is to be a little less anonymous and at the same time respectful of the power of internet sharing and honouring the privacy of conversations. Strange balance, and yes, I know that this is against the purposes of an sdn. Therefore, I'm not totally useful to the process and at the same time I hope to have done my part in the group dynamic here....
Siobhan
Is that confirmed info or speculation about whether deferrals are likely or not likely?
O.k. I get that about sharing information. As you know, I try and not be totally anonymous in threads, so that shifts a little bit about how much I want to share - I know, defeats the purpose of an anonymous forum. However, I agree with the comment that sharing is what is meant to be happening here, and that only a few are doing so. And so, in an attempt to balance that a bit - I have called a couple of times, and of course I am sending info here and there. I have not called since last week, and I don't know what kind of movement is happening in terms of leading up to deferral. Hence, why I'm asking about whether the deferral info was speculation etc.
I hope that helps in terms of promoting sharing, and at the same time preserves what I'm trying to do which is to be a little less anonymous and at the same time respectful of the power of internet sharing and honouring the privacy of conversations. Strange balance, and yes, I know that this is against the purposes of an sdn. Therefore, I'm not totally useful to the process and at the same time I hope to have done my part in the group dynamic here....
Siobhan