- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 13
Yes! I'm glad I've never had to deal with this.
Would that not present a reason for a mandated school to waitlist for that purpose?
Yes! I'm glad I've never had to deal with this.
No. There is no reason to interview OOS candidates in the first place if the odds of being able to get them are low!Would that not present a reason for a mandated school to waitlist for that purpose?
No. There is no reason to interview in the first place if the odds of being able to get them are low!
There is no way around interviewing such IS candidates, but these are exactly the students you want to accept.I'm sorry if it seems I am belaboring a point, but I am sincerely confused.
If a school is mandated to interview applicants that have stats above a certain threshold, wouldn't that present a situation where for example a student with "top 10 stats" that the school would normally not invite to interview due to the small likelihood of matriculation but does so due to mandates?
Right now there is little you can do. Most schools have taken more applicants than we can seat and are waiting to see where they will go!
I don't know any school that does this.
Every school I know could fill up their interview slots with extremely high-scoring applicants. We can only interview the ones we like the best that are more likely to attend. This "yield protection" is actually just resource management and it occurs before the interview. It makes no sense to waitlist the best interviewees when an early acceptance is our strongest recruitment tool.
Their yield could theoretically be higher. They might only pick those holding no acceptances. This strategy puts one at risk for losing good interviewees, though.So would you say that schools that accept a relatively low number of students throughout the interview season and rely heavily on the waitlist to fill the class, typically have a lower yield?
Their yield could theoretically be higher. They might only pick those holding no acceptances. This strategy puts one at risk for losing good interviewees, though.
This is different from the thoughtful selection of whom to interview.
Depending on how well the early applicants interview this could, in fact be true. It is not, however, predictable.I've seen a lot of people toss around the idea that if you interview late in the season at some schools you may be interviewing for a waitlist spot at best. Is there any truth to this?
I've seen a lot of people toss around the idea that if you interview late in the season at some schools you may be interviewing for a waitlist spot at best. Is there any truth to this?
Yes this would seem like a strange strategy. Along similar lines, how important is yield to a admissions dean? Is is used as an indicator of the dean's success?Their yield could theoretically be higher. They might only pick those holding no acceptances. This strategy puts one at risk for losing good interviewees, though.
This is different from the thoughtful selection of whom to interview.
Not much where I work. As long as we fill the class with the best of the best and come in under budget!Yes this would seem like a strange strategy. Along similar lines, how important is yield to a admissions dean? Is is used as an indicator of the dean's success?
Their yield could theoretically be higher. They might only pick those holding no acceptances. This strategy puts one at risk for losing good interviewees, though.
This is different from the thoughtful selection of whom to interview.
Yes, but only after we get to the desired number of matriculants.if someone gives up their acceptance, do they pull someone off the waitlist right away and give your spot away?
It may be a formality, but it is rude to break traffic rules, if nothing else.is that phone call to the other school just a formality? does the other school ever give you a hard time about it, try to convince you not to pull them off the wait list, etc?
It may be a formality, but it is rude to break traffic rules, if nothing else.
I've never heard a harsh word, and no one has ever tried to talk us out of a candidate except when they have begun a pre-matriculation program and we were unaware.
Cute! no.So the school where the applicant is currently situated can refuse to give them up?
Cute! no.
You are right that this could be viewed as a gray area, but generally speaking, if the student has started any program, they are viewed as matriculants.I wasn't sure what the outcome would be if they had started a pre-matriculation program!
You are right that this could be viewed as a gray area, but generally speaking, if the student has started any program, they are viewed as matriculants.
I thought you were asking about the admissions equivalent of a WWF smackdown.
Each school submits an orientation start date to AMCAS. After traffic day the potential poaching school must refer to this list to make sure that orientation has not started for this student and notify the poachee school of the intended purloinment. This is would be when when the poachee informs the poacher that the object of theft has started a pre-matriculation class (or other similar program).Now that you mention it....
Well what do you consider pre-matriculation? Orientation? I would have thought that the deadline was the first day that classes start!
Each school submits an orientation start date to AMCAS. After traffic day the potential poaching school must refer to this list to make sure that orientation has not started for this student and notify the poachee school of the intended purloinment. This is usually when the poachee informs the poacher that the object of theft has started a pre-matriculation class (or other similar program).
Small things can make a big difference...Got it.
I thought it was the first day of classes, not orientation!
Only if they keep a record. The schools from which you have withdrawn do not appear on the daily report.Can schools that waitlist you see where you have been accepted, even if you have withdrawn the acceptances?
No help for this cycle.Are additional letters of recommendation sent in after being waitlisted a good idea? My PI I've been working with for the past year I s willing to write me one that wasn't on my AMCAS
No help for this cycle.
Out of curiosity, is there a particular reason why it's no help this cycle? Applicant volume maybe?
I have a question that may be obvious to some people, but here goes. I have 1 DO acceptance, 2 MD waitlists, and 3 Hold for Spring Considerations. So let's say an MD sends me an acceptance mid-May, do I have a deadline to accept their offer, even if it is before hearing back from the other waitlists/holds? If there is a deadline, and I choose that new acceptance and withdraw from the DO, and a week later I get another acceptance, can I withdraw from that new acceptance? I hope this is not that confusing!
I see, I see. Thanks!I believe they give you a week or two to decide. And yeah I think you have the right idea.
My waitlist school said to fill out FAFSA and NeedAccess. It didn't mention other forms, though.Is anyone else filling out the Fin Aid at all of your waitlisted schools? Some of my WL letters said to fill out the Fin Aid stuff even if you're waitlisted while other letters don't mention anything. One school has recommended that I fill out Fin Aid, but I don't have a student ID to access any of their systems.![]()
What is everyone doing during the next 3+ week wait?
Right when the waitlist starts moving (if you have been accepted to a "better"school).When would be a good time to send letters of interests and/or intent? Before or after May 1?