I've been following and contributing to this thread from the beginning, and I'm asking the question because I haven't received a satisfactory answer to it thus far. I understand how PE came about, and how it was back-doored (as merely a part II, so to speak). My understanding that this recent thread chatter has been focused on eligibility to sit for Level 3 and completing the USMLE series as opposed to COMLEX. My question is apart from those two.
"The same reason PE was so easily added by indirectly requiring it without expliciting changing state licensing board language for all these states is the exact same reason the exam could be disregarded just as easily." You're suggesting that the ambiguity in wording leaves the door open to not needing the PE for licensure--perhaps it's that simple, but I can't say that for sure. So unless you're operating with information that I'm not privy to, my question still stands.
I re-read your post and am now even more confused by the question you are asking as someone "following from the beginning" frankly.
1. "Let's just play the game and suppose that PE were to be waived for the Class of 2021 (or whichever class), what would that even look like?"
Seem pretty obvious and has been discussed long before this particular thread was created as I said previously. The NBOME waives the requirement and then trainees take Level 3. They have completed the full series to satisfy state licensing boards' language. It's the full series because PE doesn't exist for 21... There is not a board that will say it is not enough because these same boards entrust the NBOME with creating the whole exam criteria in the first place. If the NBOME says they get a pass then they do. There isn't a world where a rogue state board says "No! They need PE. We know we entrusted you guys to determine what exams are needed to be finished with general medical exams but we changed our mind" The applicant with the backing of the NBOME cancelling it says that it is waived and therefore unnecessary and not possible. That's a strange scenario to begin with. Historically, state boards go with what the NBME and NBOME decide generally because it takes a long time to change things at the state level ....
2. "As in, not just the more immediate implications of taking Level 3, but beyond? Would state legislatures need to change licensing requirements? Or would there be some sort of temporary exemption for us?"
As said before, this has been discussed in the thread over and over. Read the damn licensing requirements yourself since you don't believe me (and apparently anyone else in the thread.) That's perfectly fine if you don't. Trust but verify as always in life. If it is canceled for us and not postponed then clearly there would be a permanent exemption. There wouldn't really be another alternative. It's semantics but I didn't pick the words here.
3. "Who/which organization is responsible for saying "you do not need PE in order to be a practicing physician in this country"? Is it the NBOME? The state legislatures?"
And here we are for the 10th time...
Perhaps you can rephrase your question and make it specific so someone else can help you since you just pretended that I didn't explain the situation lol. I can't help you if you arbitrarily decide that plain English in state licensing rules isn't something I can possibly understand. Go read them yourself and explain your point so we can understand what you see that NO ONE in the whole thread ever understood or even thought of besides you!!!
Edit: or for trainees in states that allow it, skip PE and Level 3 and take Step 3 before CS comes back online and assuming they already completed Step 1 and 2 CK.... Which drumroll please.. can be verified in the state licensing rules yourself since you didn't see it while reading this whole thread talking about it apparently?