- Joined
- Sep 12, 2015
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 178
Temple Anesthesiology:
View attachment 201570
Thanks ZzzPlz. On this we are in agreement...
Temple Anesthesiology:
View attachment 201570
Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Looking for a bit of guidance. I am a US MD who graduated in 2009. I always enjoyed being in the OR but couldn't commit to the general surgery lifestyle. I naively did a prelim surgery year thinking it would help guide my career path. Instead all it did was push me out of medicine for a while. After working in a non-clinical capacity for a few years, I decided it was time to get back into medicine. I was able to match into FM and am currently a PGY1. Although I am grateful for the position I have, I am slowly becoming dissatisfied with the field (constant rounding, social work headaches, clinic boredom, etc.). I have done 2 surgery rotations as well as an ICU rotation and have found that I miss being in the OR, doing procedures, and am drawn to the intellectual challenge of treating critical care patients. I am contemplating making a switch to anesthesiology but am unsure how an applicant like me would be perceived. Basic stats: step 1/2/3 - 209/220/210 all passed first attempt, state med school, did not remediate or fail any classes or rotations, bottom 1/2 of class, minimal research. I appreciate any insights you might have. Thank you.
Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Looking for a bit of guidance. I am a US MD who graduated in 2009. I always enjoyed being in the OR but couldn't commit to the general surgery lifestyle. I naively did a prelim surgery year thinking it would help guide my career path. Instead all it did was push me out of medicine for a while. After working in a non-clinical capacity for a few years, I decided it was time to get back into medicine. I was able to match into FM and am currently a PGY1. Although I am grateful for the position I have, I am slowly becoming dissatisfied with the field (constant rounding, social work headaches, clinic boredom, etc.). I have done 2 surgery rotations as well as an ICU rotation and have found that I miss being in the OR, doing procedures, and am drawn to the intellectual challenge of treating critical care patients. I am contemplating making a switch to anesthesiology but am unsure how an applicant like me would be perceived. Basic stats: step 1/2/3 - 209/220/210 all passed first attempt, state med school, did not remediate or fail any classes or rotations, bottom 1/2 of class, minimal research. I appreciate any insights you might have. Thank you.
I am currently an anesthesia resident in a malignant program. I have tried multiple times to get feedback from PD and staff but all have been very vague with nonspecific complaints. PD has told me to to really consider switching specialities. However, I am in still in good standing. I am very passionate and committed to anesthesia with plans of pursing a Pain fellowship. I am trying my best not to let this situation deter me. Ideally, I would like to switch anesthesia residency programs (and I know of an open spot), but I understand it is difficult to do so without my program's LOR (which I am afraid she will not be willing to write).
My other option is to do PM&R and hope I can get into a Pain fellowship. I know my last option is to tough it out and continue in this program, but I am afraid I will not get a letter from my current PD when the time comes to apply to Pain fellowship. I am not sure what to do in this situation and what the odds are that my PD would be willing to write a LOR for this open anesthesia spot given that I would also be happier being closer to family. Thanks for all your help in advance. I really appreciate it.
@TempleChairman
What is your take on applicants from DO programs? Are step 1/COMLEX scores held in much higher regard for osteopathic applicants and do you feel that Anesthesiology is impossible or doable for future DO students? What else do program directors such as yourself value from an applicant besides Step/COMLEX scores and away rotations? Do rotating students need to get LORs from Anesthesiology directors and attendings to shine?
I am currently an anesthesia resident in a malignant program. I have tried multiple times to get feedback from PD and staff but all have been very vague with nonspecific complaints. PD has told me to to really consider switching specialities. However, I am in still in good standing. I am very passionate and committed to anesthesia with plans of pursing a Pain fellowship. I am trying my best not to let this situation deter me. Ideally, I would like to switch anesthesia residency programs (and I know of an open spot), but I understand it is difficult to do so without my program's LOR (which I am afraid she will not be willing to write).
My other option is to do PM&R and hope I can get into a Pain fellowship. I know my last option is to tough it out and continue in this program, but I am afraid I will not get a letter from my current PD when the time comes to apply to Pain fellowship. I am not sure what to do in this situation and what the odds are that my PD would be willing to write a LOR for this open anesthesia spot given that I would also be happier being closer to family. Thanks for all your help in advance. I really appreciate it.
@TempleChairman
What is your take on applicants from DO programs? Are step 1/COMLEX scores held in much higher regard for osteopathic applicants and do you feel that Anesthesiology is impossible or doable for future DO students? What else do program directors such as yourself value from an applicant besides Step/COMLEX scores and away rotations? Do rotating students need to get LORs from Anesthesiology directors and attendings to shine?
Thanks!
Finally, I will turn to our program's 2017 match list to illustrate my concluding point. Our match list is not yet finalized, but using its present configuration I can tell you that within the current top 20 candidates the Step 1 scores range from 193 to 264. Without giving away anyone's identify, I can tell you that each of the 20 individuals listed display personal characteristics through their life history and / or interview scores that lead us to believe that they would be exceptional trainees for our program.
The analysis provided evidence on a national scale that results from the USMLE and the ABA Part 1 were correlated and that success on the latter examination was associated with level of USMLE performance. Both testing programs have been successful in conceptualizing many of the knowledge areas of interest and in developing test content to reflect those areas.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693694/
I think this correlation between Step scores and passing the ABA written exams is why many top tier residencies weigh Step score more heavily in the application process. If a program can pick among all the applicants then why not take those who are good team players in addition to good test takers? I certainly agree that scoring high on the USLME or ABA written exams is no guarantee that one will become a good Physician but it does remove one obstacle from the process: Board Certification
Thank you for taking the time to post this. I've crunched the national match list numbers as well, but it's very nice to be able to take a glimpse inside one program's Step scores to see that people with low Step I scores really are able to match in this specialty, and not just to bottom-tier programs either.
Chip N Sawbones,
You are very welcome. Glad you found it to be of some use.
Hi Nansai,
Thank you for the question. You have stumbled on a subject near and dear to my heart - appropriate and logical interpretation of quantitative data. Although it is impossible to give you a well rounded opinion on your ability to match to a specific program given the limited information presented above, let's examine your likelihood of matching based solely on your USMLE step 1 score of 201.
If you look at the published data for the 2016 NRMP match results you will see that a total of 1917 applicants were vying for a total of 1696 anesthesiology residency positions. However, these numbers include new US graduates, practicing US physicians, and foreign medical graduates. If you limit the analysis to new graduates of allopathic or osteopathic medical schools, you find that of the 1076 who listed anesthesiology as their first or only choice of specialty, 1048 (97%) matched. If you limit the analysis even further to examine exclusively the 783 that only listed anesthesiology programs on their rank list, 777 (99%) matched. From this, we can surmise that a US graduate who is genuinely interested in anesthesiology can almost always find a position somewhere.
Nonetheless, 1% still didn't match and you are worried about your Step 1 score. Let's dig slightly deeper.
If you look at the distribution of Step 1 scores amongst US medical students applying to anesthesiology residencies in 2016 you find the following pattern:
Step 1 score: 181-190, five out of five (100%) matched to anesthesiology
Step 1 score: 191-200, twenty out of twenty-eight (71%) matched to anesthesiology
Step 1 score: 201-210, fifty-six and of sixty-two (90%) matched to anesthesiology
(Just for fun I will note that one candidate with a score in the range of 251-260 went unmatched...)
Also consider the likelihood of matching based on the total number of anesthesiology programs listed by each candidate:
1 program - 50%
5 programs - 85%
>11 programs - almost 100%
Finally, I will turn to our program's 2017 match list to illustrate my concluding point. Our match list is not yet finalized, but using its present configuration I can tell you that within the current top 20 candidates the Step 1 scores range from 193 to 264. Without giving away anyone's identify, I can tell you that each of the 20 individuals listed display personal characteristics through their life history and / or interview scores that lead us to believe that they would be exceptional trainees for our program.
Therefore, my best advice is to follow your true passion, work hard, demonstrate the qualities (adaptability, team work, discipline, perseverance) required to thrive as an anesthesiologist, apply widely, and don't lose sleep over your Step 1 score. There are many vastly more important determinants of what sort of physician you will turn out to be.
Hope this is of some use to you.
@TempleChairman ever grateful for info thus far which has been illuminating.
I am a third year med student who used to be interested in ER and neurology and sometimes gynecology but could never commit. I had an epiphany a few weeks ago, realizing that anesthesia had been my specialty all along.
I am currently trying to figure out how to build a good application package for 2017-2018 season. Conventions seem to vary between specialties--for instance ER programs like to see 2 or 3 ER letters of rec to "demonstrate commitment"; however I have read various sources that say anesthesia does NOT want you to do several fourth year anesthesia rotations and they instead prefer only 1 anesthesia supplemented with rotations in Pain, ICU, general surgery, radiology etc--these being areas where you would pick up good skills for eventual training in anesthesiology.
Do you agree with this assessment? With this approach how can I demonstrate my commitment to anesthesia and set myself apart from applicants that choose it as a back-up or were undecided? What primer book would you recommend at my level to prepare for 4th year clerkships? (I go to a small community medical school and we don't have an anesthesia department so I appreciate all resources)
Another question: I found out a that I am partially colorblind last year. I can pass a red/green test but have trouble with pink/red/purple and green/brown/grey/blue. Can you think of any instances where color vision is necessary in your job? Definitely no cytology in my future.... (I can see jaundice and cyanosis just fine)
Cheers and thanks again!
Hi @TempleChairman. Thank you for taking the time to do this! I have heard it is a good idea to do a fellowship and work in academia. Do you think academic anesthesiology is a good career path for the future?
Hi Dr.
I have a question. I am still thinking about ranking IM higher or anesthesio. By the way, I am so worried about radiation exposure during anesthesiology process in the OR. Does it carry a risk? I appreciate your response
Hello again Dr.,
Thank you for your time and input, it's greatly appreciated. As you could imagine, the results left me both shocked and devastated. Glad to hear that it isn't a nail in the coffin as this forum could be intimidating at times.
If it's ok, another question that I have is how important does geographic location matter for applicants? I was told that my best chance at matching is to go back to my home state (which is Pennsylvania, grew up in the Pocono Mountains) but how much truth is there to this in your opinion?
When it comes to residents in your anesthesiology program, what would you say are the pitfalls that trouble residents fall into and how could they have been avoided or at least improved upon? I've read info regarding what makes a good anesthesiology resident, but not so much on what made the bad ones "malignant". Thanks again.
Hi Dr. __,
Thank you for taking the time to let us pick your brain!
My question is regarding asking for a recommendation letter. I'm an osteopathic student and as such dont have an anesthesiology home program. Therefor, I am doing few away rotations at residency programs for the exposure as well as to get a recommendation letter from a PD. How do PD's feel about writing a recommendation letter for an away student? Lot of times, there is very little exposure to the PD at large programs. Is there a way to get around this hurdle?
Thank you again!
Thanks again TempleChairman for your invaluable insight, i'll certainly keep everything you said in mind going forward so that I can be the best resident and ultimately doctor I can be. But getting back to the application process, what are your thoughts on extended breaks in between coursework? I know this is seen as a red flag, but i'm once again curious about your outlook on it. Thanks again in advance.
Hi sts84,
I think the two most common questions I am asked are about the requisites to obtain a residency spot (see answer to bashwell above) or about the future of the specialty (see mostwanted below).
I think the most insightful questions (i.e.: most helpful for the medical student) usually involve the themes of what I like most about the specialty (working in a team environment, very performance based, immediate feedback on decisions, very intense patient interactions - you really have their attention when you are preparing to anesthetize them) or what I like least about the specialty (you do not control your own schedule and the hours can be long and grueling).
That's it? What you like least about the specialty is thay you don't control your own schedule and the hours can be long and grueling?
I certainly hope you answer that question more honestly than this! Not controlling one's schedule and long hours are part and parcel of many fields in medicine (especially the higher paying ones), and are probably ranked quite low on the list of things most anesthesiolgists dislike about anesthesiology.
I'd level with your applicants and tell them that if they want to be respected as physician consultants, then anesthesiology isn't the field for them.
Hi ElmerFudd,
The post that you reference was completely candid on my part. I agree that currently the practice environment for physicians is evolving. Many specialists are now, for the first time, facing oversight and production pressures in employed situations that restrict their ability to control their schedules. However, over the majority of my career the lack of control (pace of work, end of day, ability to take vacation) was nearly unique to anesthesiologists and, anecdotally, the number one cause of burnout I experienced amongst colleagues.
The professional practice environment for anesthesiologists undoubtedly varies widely from setting to setting. I have genuine sympathy if you find yourself working in an institution where you do not find your input as a consultant valued. However, I think it is important for the medical students who read this thread and who are weighing important career decisions to know that your sentiments represent your specific experience and perhaps not a wider reality. In our institution the faculty from the department of anesthesiology have accountability for a broad range of processes extending from the preoperative selection and preparation of patients for surgery, managing a variety of components of the perioperative patient flow, direct care in several of our critical care units, and are routinely asked to participate or direct when groups are being assembled by the institutional leadership to tackle specific operational issues. Rather than lacking influence as physician consultants and logistics experts, I believe it is fair to say that most of our faculty feel overtaxed with requests to participate in organizational governance.
Perhaps you would be happier at Temple?
As someone with awful Step I scores but lots of things that will qualify as good character indicators, I'm delighted that your program places so little emphasis on Step I. Are scoring systems like yours common among residency programs, or do most programs just look at grades and test scores?
Don't believe everything you read. Your step 1 scores are very important to every program. Saying "we look at the whole applicant" sounds nice for the papers, but they still have to find ways to rank applicants - all of whom have many good qualities - and thus you can guarantee that your USMLE scores weigh in heavily.
Do I know this for a fact? No. I've never been on any admissions committee or served as a residency coordinator. But common sense should tell you that I'm right!
I absolutely agree, but at the same time you need to remember that these programs are having to deal with you closely for hours on end every single day for 4 years. I don't think they are just looking at your STEP scores and then making their decision on that.
Looking at your character and personality is pretty huge. There is common sense there as well.
"Evolving" - what a great word!
Surgeons (grudgingly) acknowledge us as gatekeepers who allow or block procedures, but by no means do they routinely value our input. To them, we are a tool for them to get their surgeries done and they are often uninterested in our input unless it really matters (and even then, sometimes they're not interested). Don't tell me that you've never performed a procedure under general anesthesia rather than regional, or given a unit of blood you didn't think was necessary, simply because the surgeon requested it! This is the way of private practice, which is where most of us end up working. In the end, it's the surgeon's patient, they think they know more than we do on pretty much everything, and they have the final say. We simply comply (as long as it's not harmful) and document "at surgeon's request" on our records.
While it's true that we can be "logistic experts" who can tackle "operational issues", I'd hate to think that I went through all this training for non-clinical purposes.
I absolutely agree, but at the same time you need to remember that these programs are having to deal with you closely for hours on end every single day for 4 years. I don't think they are just looking at your STEP scores and then making their decision on that.
Looking at your character and personality is pretty huge. There is common sense there as well.
And you think they can accurately judge an applicant's character and personality from thirty minutes of interviews?
Interviews take place so that they can determine that you're not a weirdo. That's pretty much the limit of an interview, which is fairly important. A candidate ability to make it through a program is best determined by grades and test scores.
Each year programs admit Med Students who simply can't pass muster. These med students, who have now become Residents, flounder/struggle or simply can't cut the mustard at the Residency. The purpose of the interview is primarily to "weed those people out" regardless of their Step scores. Also, weed out the malignant personalities and anything else that's obvious at the interview. But, despite their best efforts almost every program accepts a "problem child" to their residency every 1-2 years.
Finally, the program needs to "sell" the applicants their bill of goods so they can fill. Remember, programs need to fill because Residents are a cheap source of labor. In addition, mid and lower tier programs may not get good med students from the SOAP (unlike top tier programs which always know that surgical residents or failed ORTHO match people will choose them). This means the program needs to sell itself well enough to get good applicants to rank them. Otherwise, they may end up with more "problem children" than they care to deal with.