I agree and disagree.
I agree in that there are numerous viruses/other historically named after regions and it seems to be those instances have not been contended.
Hong Kong Flu, Asian Flu, Russian Flu, Spanish Flu.. Sure, even the Hong Kong Flu was 60 years ago, but we have MERS, which is definitely modern. I didn't see a problem calling it Wuhan Virus, but there was perceivable racism arising across the world against Chinese people, and the name change was their attempt to mitigate this. I still remember a story about a bridal shop having problems because people didn't want to get their wedding dresses from China. Did the name change work? Probably not, because racist people will be racist no matter what
I disagree in that the name of the virus has explicitly been changed. It was called Wuhan Virus at the very beginning. It was NEVER called the Chinese virus, so there is 100% no reason to call it that. As far as referring to it as Wuhan virus, it's outdated, it's not the name of the virus, there's no going back, so why? What's the point of calling it that?
That being said, I am definitely upset by the name change because it is isn't unique.. as in, SARS refers to a different virus, so you can't shorthand it, but SARS-COV-2 is an obnoxious mouthful. COVID-19 is technically the disease, not the virus, so it is not an acceptable alternative (you can *get* COVID-19, but you can't *catch* COVID-19). And many people end up calling it simply "coronavirus" which is also not appropriate. If they wanted to change it, they should've picked a better name