- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
- Messages
- 3,564
- Reaction score
- 7,296
@Matthew9Thirtyfive do you read Abstruse Goose?
@Matthew9Thirtyfive do you read Abstruse Goose?
You got pretty far then. That's something. Real analysis was one of my three favorite courses.
Real analysis II is way better than I. You just have to get through I and then coast for II
Well the ChemE major required me to get a pretty good distance but that class was a grind (at least w/ the prof who taught it).
Haha I heard that but didn't want my grades slipping too far due to the second major.
I actually enjoyed tedious proofs. Really made me take a hard look at why I was doing what I was doingHonestly the only course I didn't really like was proofs and problem solving, and only because it was so tedious. We wrote tons of proofs in real analysis and abstract algebra, but they were concise.
I actually enjoyed tedious proofs. Really made me take a hard look at why I was doing what I was doing
So I was curious why @NotASerialKiller was posting so seriously and then I saw the topic tags.
Are you purely a philosophy major or do you also have another major/minor?Biology>Biophysics>Biochemistry>Philosophy. Currently in senior year and have no plans to switch.
Purely a philosophy major. I *could* get a biology minor with one more bio elective, but don't see any reason to.Are you purely a philosophy major or do you also have another major/minor?
Mech E -> Economics -> Biology (Chem minor)
**** anything past calc 2 I say
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
The calc series is how we weed out the peons from the true math nerds.
My school required up to calc II for a BS in biology, which is ridiculous. I went up to calc I and then just said screw it and got a BA, despite meeting all other requirements. So I'm right there with you.
Applied physics. Between bio and physics.I wonder where engineering falls on the spectrum? It's a mixed bag of applied stuff
Bio>bio
Didn't change because I had a good idea of what I wanted to do. I had to go up to calc 2 for my Bio degree (UC system) which sucked. Ruled out going to some of the UCs because they wanted 1.5 year of Calc! F that
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Biochem majors at my school are required to take both Calc I and Calc II, but we are very lucky because we have the option of taking a series that is directed to the "life and social sciences." I basically took Calc I with a bunch of business majors plus some life science majors, and took calc II with mainly other life science majors. I took calculus in high school and it was a lot easier in college. I'm not sure how I would have fared in Calc II if I had to take the more mathematically intensive one that engineering/physics/economics majors generally take, though.
Yes I completely agree. Have not used any calc past physics (has to be calc based phys in the UC system). Thanks CA :/These schools are crazy with their calc requirements for a bio degree. I had a similar issue at my school and settled for a BA. There's zero reasons to require that much math for a bio degree. I can maybe see why calc 1 is required, although it's not needed, but anything past that is just killing it.
Haha, yes, of course. I guess that was sort of implied in my head. To be fair, a lot of the math majors (as well as other majors) at my school actually end up skipping both Calc I and II because of AP BC Calc credit. Which is kind of crazy to me since I hear that Calc II is a bit of a right of passage.Or math majors?
Thank goodness for the life science version of math related classes. Not sure how I would have survived physics otherwise.Biochem majors at my school are required to take both Calc I and Calc II, but we are very lucky because we have the option of taking a series that is directed to the "life and social sciences." I basically took Calc I with a bunch of business majors plus some life science majors, and took calc II with mainly other life science majors. I took calculus in high school and it was a lot easier in college. I'm not sure how I would have fared in Calc II if I had to take the more mathematically intensive one that engineering/physics/economics majors generally take, though.
The UC I went to required multivariable calculus (thankfully the life science version) for molecular bio. Then they removed requirement after I took the class :/Bio>bio
Didn't change because I had a good idea of what I wanted to do. I had to go up to calc 2 for my Bio degree (UC system) which sucked. Ruled out going to some of the UCs because they wanted 1.5 year of Calc! F that
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Paramedic>Exercise Science>Biology>Physics
Haha, yes, of course. I guess that was sort of implied in my head. To be fair, a lot of the math majors (as well as other majors) at my school actually end up skipping both Calc I and II because of AP BC Calc credit. Which is kind of crazy to me since I hear that Calc II is a bit of a right of passage.
for those of you that started in physics or engineering and ended up in biology: was it the math that was too much? or were the concepts too abstract to grasp
for those of you that started in physics or engineering and ended up in biology: was it the math that was too much? or were the concepts too abstract to grasp
Materials Engineering --> Nursing --> Global Health --> dropped out and joined the Army --> came back, reenrolled as Microbiology, dropped out again --> realized I was stupid and got an A.S. in Paramedicine --> worked for a couple years then reenrolled in university, still as Micro --> ordered to deploy with the Army, so I transferred schools to finish a B.S. in Paramedic Care online while overseas, in doing so finally stopped denying that I wanted to be a physician --> got home and finished my premed prereqs, and in doing so "accidentally" completed the requirements for a B.S. Microbiology
10 years from first class to final graduation. The last year has been strong (GPA=3.9) but those first years were not (closer to a 2.0). Studying for the MCAT now, then applying to postbaccs.
I just had an exam in my upper division classical mechanics course where we were tested on topics involving Vterm. This is perfect!View attachment 209458
Sent from my A0001 using SDN mobile
I came across this earlier today when I was googling some jokes with my fellow physics majors, and yours reminded me of it
I thought calc 2 was easy personally. Integrals made sense to me. I'm finding calc 3 harder personallyMost of the people I know that start out engineering and change it's because of the math. If you can get past calc 2 tho you'll be fine. Calc 3, differential equations, linear alg (that's as far as I went) are all a breeze in comparison to Calc 2.
I thought calc 2 was easy personally. Integrals made sense to me. I'm finding calc 3 harder personally
I thought calc 2 was easy personally. Integrals made sense to me. I'm finding calc 3 harder personally
Pretty sure that's what I did...Then you didn't have good exposure in calc 2. Calc 2 is supposed to take what you learned in calc 1 and make you apply it to different problems, requiring you to think and troubleshoot. Once you get through calc 2, calc 3 should be easy as you're just expanding it to mutivariable calculus.
Pretty sure that's what I did...