Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Angelus9 I get that you're very passionate about this subject, but just to play devil's advocate is there anything at all from those with an opposite point of view than yours that you could understand the reasoning behind?
Sure. I absolutely understand where they're coming from. As people have pointed out, they don't investigate but are taken in by cute pictures of puppies and kittens, and good lord, who ISN'T against animal cruelty?
You forget that to get to where I am now I've already HAD my views modified. I read all the HSUS stuff, I read all the Animal Agenda, Peter Singer, PETA, ALF, all that stuff. Even went to meetings with these groups (not ALF). And because I did that, I most certainly did "modify my point of view." To assume that I sprang to this viewpoint, like Venus from the Sea, is erroneous. I got here by studying both sides and by being actively involved in animal rescue. The truth simply cannot be denied as to what AR means. By the AR's own definitions, not mine.
The FACT that Peter Singer supports bestiality, the FACT that PeTA has been allowed to remove trucks full of dogs from animal shelters "to adopt them out" and then immediately euthanizes all of them in the back of the truck, the FACT that after Katrina HSUS filled dumpster after dumpster with brand new unused dog crates and other supplies donated to them because all HSUS wanted was cash, the FACT of the endless comments by ARs about utterly eliminating domestic animals of all species....yeah, that pretty much changed my mind on where I stood on the AR issue.
It seemed quite logical to me to, before I started calling myself a member of/supporter of, some group or agenda, to maybe actually find out what the group's agenda actually is. Obviously this is a radical concept to some people here. At the very least it's something that never occurred to them to do. And as to that lack of thought and reason, as the song says, I don't find that stuff amusing anymore.
Last edited:

Love it!